15,522
edits
m |
|||
==
Ratings suck. It's too complicated of a structure. Let's keep Featured Article as a "status" for pages and keep the nomination page for it. Everything else doesn't need to be rated, and if a page needs big time expansion, we can start labeling pages as stubs instead of C4 or C5. If a page is merely out of date, we should have a [[lmow:Template:Update|Update template]]. If a page is a mess, we should have [[lmow:Template:Cleanup|Cleanup template]]. It's an easier method that any reader/user will understand how to help without having to understand the rating system (or possibly without having to fully know our MoS) --[[User:ToaMeiko|ToaMeiko]] ([[User talk:ToaMeiko|talk]]) 04:03, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
* I like the idea of going down to a 3 or 4 tier system, as at the mo I think the lines between C4-C3 and Good-Featured are a bit blurry/pointless. I don't like the idea of slapping maintenance templates on pages though, they just get in the way of what little content articles have. Plus, they don't allow nice overviews of themes' ratings (like on Nova's blog or some project pages). [[User:UltrasonicNXT|UltrasonicNXT]] ([[User talk:UltrasonicNXT|talk]])
:::::::I was thinking like that, but say "This article is missing a few pieces. You can help by adding a {description}" or whatever needs an article. [[User:CJC95|CJC95]] ([[User talk:CJC95|talk]]) 20:45, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
* I'm kind of interested in Nova's described potential system. I think it has just the right level of information, and those levels of quality seem to be about right too. :P Workdesks also sound interesting... [[User:BrickfilmNut|BrickfilmNut]] ([[User talk:BrickfilmNut|talk]]) 21:13, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
<div style="background:#FFCCCC;">▼
===Vote===
===Voting procedures for ratings (if any)===▼
====Keep ratings as they are====
====Move to a 4-tier system (stub, average, complete, featured)====
# Per reasoning above {{User:NovaFlare/sig}} 03:24, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
====Scrap rating system, moving to a template-based system with stub, update, etc====
====Comments====
* NXT, if you wanted to have a separate entry, please add, I think our ideas are pretty similar though. @Meiko, sorry if I didn't describe your idea well enough in the title, please feel free to reword. {{User:NovaFlare/sig}} 03:24, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
▲<div style="background:#FFCCCC;">
'''Please hold off on this topic until "Should we change or remove any/all ratings?" has been resolved'''
</div>
<div style="background:#FFCCCC;">
'''Please hold off on this topic until "Should we change or remove any/all ratings?" has been resolved'''
</div>
<div style="background:#FFCCCC;">
'''Please hold off on this topic until "Should we change or remove any/all ratings?" has been resolved'''
</div>
<div style="background:#FFCCCC;">
'''Please hold off on this topic until "Quality Check Group/Review Quality Moderators" has been resolved'''
</div>
|
edits