Brickipedia:Articles for Rating/Class 1/5614 The Good Wizard
From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it.
- Nominated by: Agent Charge 07:33, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: It meets the criteria completely.
Vote score: -1, Technical Check: Currently OK[edit source]
- Support
I actually don't see why not, other than the LDD models. Berrybrick 10:17, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Object
- Too short for a C1 in my opinion, I just don't think there's enough to say about the contents of an impulse set for it to reach that rating. Also, what's with the last two images in the gal? They look like LDD renderings.... NovaHawk 01:28, September 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Um ... that would be because the images are LDD models. So if a impulse set cannot be Class 1, why isn't it stated in the criteria? Agent Charge Please vote 02:26, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Because it isn't a rule. It's just something that isn't possible, so it doesn't need to be said. For example, it would be pointless to make a law saying that "Cows are not permitted to fly airplanes underwater at -10 miles per hour." User:Captain Jag/sig1 02:30, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
- In that case, how did this achieve Class 1 status? Agent Charge Please vote 02:46, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
- That isn't an impulse set. User:Captain Jag/sig1 19:02, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
- So a part (1 piece) can become a c1 article, but an impulse set (More than 1) can't? That's weird. Agent Charge Please vote 21:41, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
- I thought we had different criteria for a c1 part article (I know there was a forum about it a while ago, I think it was when I was inactive or something). Now knowing that there isn't I would have opposed that too. (note to all- when indenting in areas that contain votes, please start your formatting with a #, eg single indent- #:, double #::, etc. Thanks). NovaHawk 23:47, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
- NBS, what do I do to improve it? Agent Charge Please vote 02:53, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if there is much you can do, since it covers all of the set well. User:Captain Jag/sig1 03:24, September 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Per Jag, I think it's a great article for what it's based on, but I just don't think it has the potential to reach c1 status NovaHawk 03:33, September 17, 2012 (UTC)
- In that case, you oppose is invalid. The rules say If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Failure to do so will result in your objection being considered invalid. Agent Charge Please vote 03:41, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
- I wrote that rule, and I'd say "I don't think it has the potential to be C1" is fairly concrete. Maybe just me, though. User:Cligra/Sig
- But I don't think it can be improved. (much) User:Captain Jag/sig1 03:51, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
- @Jag, much as some substance. @Cligra, then why did you oppose? Agent Charge Please vote 03:56, September 18, 2012 (UTC
- I think people are misunderstanding me- what I mean is, NHL's oppose seems perfectly legitimate. User:Cligra/Sig
- @Cligra, so can you change rules that you make? Agent Charge Please vote 06:15, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
- I think people are misunderstanding me- what I mean is, NHL's oppose seems perfectly legitimate. User:Cligra/Sig
- I wrote that rule, and I'd say "I don't think it has the potential to be C1" is fairly concrete. Maybe just me, though. User:Cligra/Sig
- In that case, you oppose is invalid. The rules say If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Failure to do so will result in your objection being considered invalid. Agent Charge Please vote 03:41, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
- Per Jag, I think it's a great article for what it's based on, but I just don't think it has the potential to reach c1 status NovaHawk 03:33, September 17, 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if there is much you can do, since it covers all of the set well. User:Captain Jag/sig1 03:24, September 17, 2012 (UTC)
- NBS, what do I do to improve it? Agent Charge Please vote 02:53, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
- I thought we had different criteria for a c1 part article (I know there was a forum about it a while ago, I think it was when I was inactive or something). Now knowing that there isn't I would have opposed that too. (note to all- when indenting in areas that contain votes, please start your formatting with a #, eg single indent- #:, double #::, etc. Thanks). NovaHawk 23:47, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
- So a part (1 piece) can become a c1 article, but an impulse set (More than 1) can't? That's weird. Agent Charge Please vote 21:41, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
- That isn't an impulse set. User:Captain Jag/sig1 19:02, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
- In that case, how did this achieve Class 1 status? Agent Charge Please vote 02:46, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Because it isn't a rule. It's just something that isn't possible, so it doesn't need to be said. For example, it would be pointless to make a law saying that "Cows are not permitted to fly airplanes underwater at -10 miles per hour." User:Captain Jag/sig1 02:30, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Um ... that would be because the images are LDD models. So if a impulse set cannot be Class 1, why isn't it stated in the criteria? Agent Charge Please vote 02:26, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Per NBS. User:Cligra/Sig
- Technical MoS Check (QCG members only)
It has no background.. I think Castle has a story, doesn't it?
User:Cligra/Sig
- I didn't follow it too closely (or at all) but I don't think he played a role. If anyone would know though, Knight would, so ask him. Berrybrick 23:57, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
- @Cligra, the only story that LEGO officially released of Castle theme that I know of that covers the time period that the wizard was released in was from the troll's viewpoint, but I'll have a look. Agent Charge Please vote 00:32, September 3, 2012 (UTC)
- I've check it, and I can't find anything about the Good Wizard. Agent Charge Please vote 01:47, September 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Comments
- I'm going to be neutral on this one. There doesn't seem to be much to add and yet it feels as if something's missing...
JeyoLord VladekTalk The Forge
Not Done. Has failed to reach three supporting votes after three weeks. NovaHawk 03:49, September 25, 2012 (UTC)
