Brickipedia:Articles for Rating/Class 1/Emmet's Car

Articles for Rating → Class 1 article nominations → Archive → Emmet's Car

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it.

• Nominated by: ToaMeiko (talk) 03:15, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: The article is as complete as it can be, and is well-written and has all relevant images on the page.

Vote score: ±2, Technical Check: Currently OK

Support

1. Looks fine Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}
2. Seems to be complete. --LK901^{100 AE - TLM RP} 11:17, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
3. Looks good. CJC95 (talk) 19:57, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Object

1. Sure, it's complete- but why does that mean it should be a C1? There isn't really anything special about the page. (random other note: the images are poorly placed). -Cligra

   Not sure how they're poorly placed. They're placed where they are relevant to the article. If you mean that there are some that are thumbnailed instead of all smashed into the Gallery, then that's a good thing. Why should it be C1? Because it's better than C2. It's more than just "complete". If you don't think it is, I don't see why we consider C1 or even Featured Articles to be such, especially those that are just text walls. --ToaMeiko (talk) 16:33, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

   I see a C1 as being something that goes "above and beyond" what a C2 normally does. I admit it's really just a feel thing, but I've gone by it for several years now. :P As for the images- I can't do it right now, but I'll fix what I see as the problems with them in a few hours. -Cligra

   There, formatted the images a bit. All that it really needed was clear templates. It would look better now if the article had a bit more text, though.

   Anyway, this still doesn't seem like a C1. It's complete. That's all. -Cligra

Technical MoS Check (QCG members only)

Comments