Brickipedia:Requests for Adminship/Archive2

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki

Crazed Penguin 2[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was withdrawn

Crazed Penguin's Statement: Despite only being on here for 8 months, I feel that I am ready for such rights, I know there will be heavy support, But I'm mostly wondering what the feedback will be, I'm a community user who participates on forums very often. I already have Rollback and Patroller, I may have gotten into a fight late last year but I can happily say, We are all friends now. I have coolen down alot. I was chatmod until it was disabled then not given back the rights (odd), I hope you understand what I mean, Please make this my birthday present. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 02:16, February 7, 2012 (UTC)


Support

  • He's a really good friend, he knows when to block someone, and he's just so very kind. I bet you he's going to get supported by many. User:Awesomeknight1234/SigbyCP
  • Friendly, and is always willing to help. Power Jim 06:26, February 8, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

  • Great User yet: I have concerns regarding the maturity of the user. He seems to be quite biased if you will when it comes to some users. Also concerning British English this user needs work on. Calling new users blog trolling or spam when it is not. Another thing is ranting isn't exactly a good admin quality. Also my last thing is revoloving around the point that he did vandalise the MegaBloks Wiki and wouldn't have appoligized if he hadn't been caught. Something else is I don't how seeing "meh" is helpful on forums. Sorry if this seems like very harsh but it is constructive critism. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 02:16, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
I understand completely. The MegaBloks thing I've tryed to forget. Please understand that, That moment was a month or so into my time here. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 02:19, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Somewhat of an oppose... he's not quite as serious as the admins we're used to. User:1999bug/sig1 02:15, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
    NBP3.0 User:Captain Jag/sig1 03:09, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
    But he's inactive. Another reason why I think we need to fill the "Funny but very serious admin" role. :D --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 04:02, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
    NBP is more of a jokester, he's very serious as far as his role. I'm not sure if CP's serious enough to handle sysop rights. User:1999bug/sig1 02:15, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Weak oppose Per above, I have some concerns with bias and maturity. However, if you work on this, you may have my support. User:Cligra/Sig
Ok thanks! I'm working on being more mature, At the moment, 2 people I had problems with are now my best friends :) --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 04:01, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
Cool. User:Cligra/Sig
:D --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 04:08, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • too soon
- I'd like to see more time editing here, and some more maturity. I'm not too keen to support an admin who was banned from chat less than a month ago either. That being said, Crazed Penguin is a great user who is a definite asset to Brickipedia. I just don't think that he is at the point of adminship yet. User:Ajraddatz/sig 05:20, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per above, concerns with maturity and attitude towards some users. - CJC 19:36, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per others. I know that you can be mature, but sometimes you just don't let things go. And we really don't need a funny admin to lighten the mood. Any user could probably do that. Berrybrick 19:57, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose sorry, you're just not the kind of person I'd expect to be admin. Try aiming for something smaller. Like chat mod rights. --From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 19:39, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Great user, and love his personality and passion for editing, although user is lacking some maturity. Coming from a former admin, sysop rights come with a lot of responsibility; maybe if we watched this user a wee bit more, time will tell. Also, per first oppose. User:Skdhjf/SigT 02:10, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but per Mr. Minifigure and Ajr NovaHawk 03:24, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per others, unfortunately. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 10:40, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Strong Oppose I've seen some things coming from him that I wouldn't be very comfortable coming from an admin. Drewlzoo(talk) (blogs)
  • per the rest, really. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature
  • Per everyone.Clone gunner commander jedi talk

Comments

BTW It's my birthday today!!! --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 02:02, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
Happy late birthday :D -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 10:40, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • In response to your statement above, you do not have chat mod as you have no passed a request for chat mod... - CJC 19:59, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
I'm withdrawing. CP

Kingpinn2[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Withdrawn

I was only asked to set this up for KingPinn2 (by himself). Hopefully, he will fill in "the detailed explanation". Berrybrick 20:03, February 10, 2012 (UTC)

First of all, I want to thank Berrybrick for posting this forum for me. Second of all, I think I should be an admin because of my contributions. If it weren't for me, we would of never known about LEGO (feature film) (or Build Together). If you think I haven't done anything (cough, User:Clone gunner commander jedi), just look at my contributions and you'll see what I've done. Please support me! -User:Kingpinn2

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  • I never see him on chat or see his edits in recent activity.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • Use has no need for the rights, and does not seem mature enough to use them correctly anyway. User:Cligra/Sig
  • Per Cligra. No explanation really needed here... -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 20:18, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • No need for rights. Plus, I'd hope that any potential admin candidates would be able to put their name in the box on BP:URR and click enter themselves (If they are self-nominating that is). - CJC 20:27, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Can't even set up the request properly, per above. User:Ajraddatz/sig 21:09, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • From my view his not a very active user and probably won't be a very active Admin. --Power Jim 23:20, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per above. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
  • Don't understand. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 23:34, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Was gonna consider this, but after reading below, no. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 00:48, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nope, this user should NOT have sysop tools. Why? His attitude at some points gets sort of questionable and immature a bit. This is my main concern. Also, for your description on "why you want to be an admin" (the "if it weren't for me, we wouldn't have known about so and so...") - what on earth does this have to do with sysop tools? Seriously? No offense, but this user has a pretty long heck of a way to go until he gets admin rights (unless you comepletely change your PoV and act more maturely). User:Skdhjf/SigT 00:53, February 11, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • I can see I have 8 opposing users and 0 supporters. Power Jim posted "his not a very active user". First of all, "he is not a very active user", second of all, I'm not that active all the time because I have 4 siblings at home and I'm asked most of the time to do chores. Cligra and User:King of Nynrah think I'm not mature enough, when was the last time I did something immature. I could go on finding solutions for all of your comments but I rather not. -User:Kingpinn2
    Unfortunately, this is a place where the community decides if you would be a good admin, not a place for you to decided whether or not certain people should be allowed to express their opinions. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:58, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Also KingPinn2 we are not a bribing community. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 00:19, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • I can see why no one supported me, please delete this forum and I'll try again some other time.

Skdhjf 3[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was not done

Tat's return has been great. He has edited heaps, Helped the chat room, I think he can use the rights well. He'd need them. I know he has lost the powers before but we understood him.

Support

  • --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 00:40, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • NovaHawk 01:16, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • User:Captain Jag/sig1 01:18, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
    • He had admin rights before, and then they were removed. The reasons for removing were as follows: blocking any users that could be underage, using his userpage to rant, going inactive to cool down, his attitude, and enforcing the chat guidelines to the point of driving users away. Since he came back, he hasn't blocked any users (:D), and I haven't seen him using his userpage to rant. He has not gone inactive. I haven't seen him enforcing the chat guidelines (at all (funny that :P)) but I have been talking with him a lot recently, and I don't think that he will either block users without proof or reason, enforce guidelines excessively. I haven't seen him having a attitude of being more important than other people, though he may have. Has anyone seen an example of any of these since he came back? User:Captain Jag/sig1 18:20, January 30, 2012 (UTC)
  • User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 01:22, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • I'd be OK with this. User:Ajraddatz/sig 03:04, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
  • Weak Support User:CM4S/Sig
    • Why a weak support? --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 08:36, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
      • You say that as if its a bad thing. - CJC 17:43, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
  • Hm. - CJC 17:43, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
  • User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature
  • Elaboration Tat was a trusted admin before various events, and I believe he has turned a new leaf since then. I couldn't give a single bad thing I have seen him do since he came back, and I have no reason to think that he would in the future. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature

Neutral

  • I personally just think it's too soon. Berrybrick 19:47, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  • NO Lets wait a bit more. Remember what happened last time we rushed into this O.o User:Darth henry/Sig 00:42, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose I do agree that he should have these rights but now's not the time. —Unsigned comment by Agent Swipe (talk • contribs).
  • Oppose I'm not saying this for my own sake, but others too. He is demonstrating that he hasn't changed much... No offense Tat... I can have an opinion, too. User:1999bug/sig1 02:11, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
    • Would you be able to provide an example of these "demonstrations"? NovaHawk 05:07, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
      • It was due to earlier when we were discussing possible biased chat moderators. First, I was suspecting two chat mods were biased: CGCJ and 1999bug (due to CGCJ unbanning Prisinorzero last month and was accused of being biased for unbanning him). I then decided to investigate the matter, and asked 1999bug his thoughts on the matter. We chatted, and I thought I had a conclusion. Although, I decided to go to Crazed Penguin and see his thoughts on the matter. I then told him I thought bug was being a bit biased as a mod for unbanning Prisinorzero earlier (he was already unbanned) (when zero should've been banned). 1999bug is mad because I told him I thought he wasn't a biased mod, then I went to Crazed Penguin saying I thought about him being a biased moderator. Also, another admin agrees with me on this matter. I was merely trying to investigate.. it's not like I hurt anyone.. Since when has a user lost rights to investigate matters in which he/she feels that is fishy? So I have no idea why 1999bug has to get offended and try to stir me up (it doesn't stir me up.) by opposing my RfA. User:Skdhjf/SigT 05:17, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
Tats still showin WHY he should be admin. He isn't stirred about alot that happend today. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 08:33, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
Per above... Actually, all I did today was try to investigate a matter I thought should be resolved. User:Skdhjf/SigT 08:35, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose for now. A nice guy, but we need more time to decide whether he deserves the tools back, and will keep his cool under the constant stress that admins have to deal with, I think. Might change my mind sometime after posting this. -King of Nynrah Talk 17:58, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per KoN :) User:Cligra/Sig

Comments

Closing

Not done - I am closing this request as not done. Regardless of the system of voting used here, there is only 67% support for Skd becoming an admin, and that just isn't enough. Add to that the fact that none of the supporters actually presented any evidence to show how Skd would be a good admin, and you get a "not done" with both the straw poll system and the consensus system.

That being said, I am going to leave this request open for two more days to encourage people on both sides to expand their arguments, and hopefully get a bit more input. This decision of mine can also be challenged during that time. User:Ajraddatz/sig 17:36, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

FB100Z[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

FB has been a trusty user, I'm sure he could use the rights properly. A good user who is a Master Coder. I'm sure he'd do the right thing. He's up to date with everything. An active Community user too. I can't see this failing.

Support

  • --User:Crazed Penguin/Simple 02:16, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • ya got my vote :) User:Darth henry/Sig 02:37, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • I've known FB100Z for a long time (more than anyone else here), and I can pretty confidently say that he would be a good admin. That being said, not entirely sure why he accepted this nom since I doubt it will pass. User:Ajraddatz/sig 03:29, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
    Getting feedback from the community about my flaws as an editor is a rewarding experience in itself. FB100Z • talk • contribs 05:25, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Great guy, very nice and helpful, totally yes. --CollectableMinifig4Scientist 03:55, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Might not know you, but from what I've heard, you've helped out a bunch and truly deserve the job! :D - TheHarleyQuinn

Neutral

  • Could do with more mainspace edits and stuff like thats. - CJC 09:32, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
    • Neutral - Not sure what to vote for at the moment. Per NHL. And, too many admins is not a valid reason to oppose. And Ajr, how do you know? Maybe he is someone's brother... (or maybe he's your brother, in which case you're right...) User:Captain Jag/sig1 07:21, December 1, 2011 (UTC)
      • He is a bureaucrat at my home wiki, the MLNWiki, so I know exactly how he uses the tools. User:Ajraddatz/sig 14:27, December 1, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral NHL has a very valid point. Though (he) has good technical expertise, and would use the tools wisely. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature
  • I hate opposing, and I don't feel supporting would be right...I hate inner-conflict. :/ NHL has a great point though... -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 17:34, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral Per NHL Charge talk Go Briki! 02:56, December 15, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Has a tendency to change policies without consensus, an action which is among one of the last qualities I would like to see in an administrator. Was also extremely unimpressed with this, claiming "technical reasons" as to why the username template had to be removed even though it was simply because they didn't like the template- after that I have a hard time trusting any "reasons" they give. Not to mention the constant complaining about admins which was much more prevalent when they first got there- if we're all so horrible, why would you want to be one? Also, has less than 1000 edits in the mainspace so not extremely active there, I can't really see a huge need for the tools, and think there are other users more active in the mainspace which would benefit more from them. That said, I don't think this user is a "bad user" or anything like that, and has definitely done a great job lately helping out with various things including getting the reviews and customs stuff set up NovaHawk 03:05, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
    • (Note- for that fifth link, I was only referring to the removal of "requests last for two weeks" bit, I believe the rest was approved at the time) NovaHawk 03:05, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
    • It is indeed true that I need to edit the mainspace much more, the main reason why I don't think this RfA will pass. The USERNAME thing was a bit of a joke, and I honestly wasn't expecting anyone to take it seriously. Thanks heaps for the feedback anyway; I know that I'm a flawed user. FB100Z • talk • contribs 05:18, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • You are an amazing user but NHL brought up a good point. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 03:18, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Per NHL... also we have too many admins at the moment IMO. -KoN Talk 10:07, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • I actually think that he could be and good admin. But; Per NHL and CJC. Berrybrick 11:37, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • Yes, but not out of actual confidence that I could become an admin. I'm just curious as to how this will turn out. FB100Z • talk • contribs 02:28, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Heh, I thought he already had admin.. --CollectableMinifig4Scientist 03:55, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • This is overdue to be closed- can someone do something with it? Thanks. NovaHawk 02:59, December 15, 2011 (UTC)

OtterSurf[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

OtterSurf is a trusted user, Edits alot and is very calm and keeps his/her cool. I think OtterSurf has been underrated by many. I really think OtterSurf can be an admin.

Support

  • As nominator --CP

Neutral

  • An amazing user, and if we absolutely had to have one more admin right now, OtterSurf would be near the top of my list (if not the top of my list) for who should get the rights. However, as Mr. Minifigure said, input into forums is lacking, with only one edit there. I'm not saying that I think admins should spend their lives in the forums and nowehere else- most of the time I would rather see admins out in the mainspace than in the forums- but at the same time a little more input into decisions being made in the forums would be nice. NovaHawk 04:44, November 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • OtterSurf is da man, but I'd love to see more community activity per NHL. We do need more admins now, though; I've seen various vandal attacks with nobody around to help. FB100Z • talk • contribs 23:37, November 19, 2011 (UTC)
    That's why I vwant a new tool. I'm the only one on sometimes with heaps of vandalism and language. I'd make a good admin. --User:Crazed Penguin/Normal 04:36, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
    :/ Please keep your own admin campaigns off other people's nominations... NovaHawk 04:42, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
    I know. Just saying....CP
    You can always try again later. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 21:43, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
  • PA - CJC 16:40, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral -KoN Talk 16:51, November 22, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Oppose
Amazing content contributions, but no need for the sysop tools. Adminship is not a reward. User:Ajraddatz/sig 20:54, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
  • Stronge Oppose
 Personally I think the user doesn't do much in forums, and also socalizing with other users... well just doesn't work for adminship rights.  Plus I have also seen what should take one edit made into thirty edits.  To me everyday OS earns a badge for doing this so personally I think that shouldn't be why they get admin rights.  Otherwise an amazing user.  User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 23:12, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
  • Per others, great editor though Berrybrick 22:44, November 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • Has the user accepted the nomination ( :P )? Berrybrick 20:52, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
    Indeed he/she has. User:Ajraddatz/sig 20:54, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
    OtterSurf on my talk page said so...CP
    CP, do you have SUBST in your sig?... User:Captain Jag/sig1 21:57, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
  • Ooops. Wrong sig.....hehe....CP
  • This request should end on Dec. 2nd. User:Ajraddatz/sig 00:50, November 21, 2011 (UTC)


Harryhogwarts[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

I am nominating myself because I am very resourceful, reliable, and informational. While helping edit the LEGO Harry Potter: Years 5-7 page I found a lot of information. I believe I would be a good admin.

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  • oppose
No need for the tools, also concerns with his interactions with other users and a lack of participation in forums and such. User:Ajraddatz/sig 01:05, November 17, 2011 (UTC)

Doesn't need the tools, and does need more experience. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature
  • The user doesn't have great grammar, no previous rights, and has been blocked a few times.
 User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 01:20, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
  • NovaHawk 23:27, November 18, 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose - As with our other current candidate, I'd like to see more community interaction. We can never seem to achieve consensuses on forums, but it's the thought that counts...unless you're spending three months figuring out whether to capitalize the letter M. FB100Z • talk • contribs 23:39, November 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • Per absoluetly everyone here. Has no experience, and I've seen him blocked a few times.
--CollectableMinifig4Scientist 01:26, November 21, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • Request for snow closure. I don't think that this request needs two weeks, there is not possible chance of it passing and there really isn't any reason to keep it open. Requests like these go beyond constructive criticism. User:Ajraddatz/sig 00:51, November 21, 2011 (UTC)


Francesco Mondada[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

He has been on for the required 2 months, he's been BOTM in his 1st month,and he has 2000+ edits, and makes pages of sets we didn't even know existed.

Support

Neutral

  • Nothing against the user, infact they make brilliant edits, but not sure it is needed right now and we seem to just be nominating users for admin on the premise that they can. - Kingcjc 14:47, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
  • Per cjc User:Legoguy2805/sig1 08:07, October 24, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral- Doesn't really need the tools. User:Captain Jag/sig1 01:40, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
    • Are you sure you're in the right section? :) NovaHawk 01:59, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
      • Oops. I was looking at the comment on the header below and typed that in instead. :) User:Captain Jag/sig1 02:23, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
  • Great editor, but as a lot of people have said, not sure they have a need for the tools. NovaHawk 01:59, October 27, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  • He's 4 days younger on Brickipedia than me. Amazing or what? He has 2,500 edits in 1 month, I had 170 in one month. --User:Crazed Penguin/Sig3 04:45, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
Amazing content work, no need for the tools. Also, what's with all these admin noms at once O_o User:Ajraddatz/sig 15:11, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
  • From the looks of his talkpage he didn't say that he really wanted it. But also many edits but socialiazing... pleh. No offense.
 User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 20:17, October 23, 2011 (UTC)  P.S. Can we stop with all these admin noms?
  • Uhhh not the time
Also, Too many noms at the momo. Per Mr.M. I'm sure Francesco didn't accept. Maybe Withdrawal? --User:Crazed Penguin/Sig3 07:02, October 24, 2011 (UTC)
  • No, good and plentiful edits, but as he said on Darth Henry's talk page, they will decline in numbers. He also isn't very involved in the community. --Berrybrick (Talk)


Snowhive[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Snowhive is very trust worthy and has 5,000 plus edits. He does a lot of the work all of us hates, like linking to the dutch wiki as well as other things. He is very friendly.

Support

Neutral

  • Your reason sounds like adminship is a reward... not saying anything bad about the nominated, but it's not really a valid reason for admin. User:Captain Jag/sig1 21:52, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • Firstly, lets note that as some people are mentioning, Snowhive is in fact linking to the German site not the Dutch. Anyway, I don't see how you or the site would really benefit from this. Good edits, but don't really need admin tools. - Kingcjc 18:49, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
  • I don't wanna oppose, but I just can't support. What the others said. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 20:23, October 21, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Sorry but the explanation is he links stuff to a Dutch site. Not a real ppersuading argument to me.
 User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 22:28, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • weak no
Snowhive is a great user and sysop at de.lego, but he isn't very active here. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:09, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • Per Ajr and Mr. M. Also, Darth henry told me (via chat) that some of the other reasons were to catch vandals and rename pages, non-admins (such as myself) do that without sysop abilites. Sorry. --Berrybrick (Talk)

Berrybrick[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

A friendly and consistently active user who's been with us for over one and a half years now, and has made over 5000 edits in that time (over 3000 of them mainspace). He knows the MoS well, and has been a great QCG member. I've never seen Berrybrick misuse his existing rights, and as far as I've seen has been great in any interperonal interactions. I really can't see why he shouldn't have these tools. NovaHawk 12:33, October 19, 2011 (UTC)

Support

  • As nominator NovaHawk 12:33, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • I very kind and helpful user Agent Swipe(talk)
  • he genuinely deserves this User:Darth henry/Sig 12:45, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • Yes! This guy knows what he is doing and how to do it! User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 12:46, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • I was wondering when this would happen. Berrybrick is an amazing editor here, keeps a level head and will make a great admin I'm sure. User:Ajraddatz/sig 13:43, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • I keep thinking he is.. Shows how much I pay attention. - Kingcjc 16:46, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support Naturally. User:Cligra/Sig
  • Support Per Ajr User:Captain Jag/sig1 18:54, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support Sure. Just don't expect me to be the one teaching him the techy stuff ^^ User:Legoguy2805/sig1 19:08, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support for sure!
Great guy, I doubt he'll leave us again. ;) -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 19:19, October 19, 2011 (UTC)

B'Brick is a great user, who will use the tools wisely. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 13:58, October 23, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

Comments

  • Has the user accepted the nomination? NovaHawk 12:33, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • i think it's unanamous so you can close the nomination User:Darth henry/Sig 12:42, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
  • All nominations last two weeks, regardless of their chance of success. My RfA lasted a couple of days over two weeks, actually, and it had unanimous support. User:Ajraddatz/sig 13:57, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
  • Because we all love you silly. :P -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 20:26, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nominations last two weeks? Pray tell me, where the hell do these unwritten rules come from? FB100Z • talk • contribs 04:18, October 24, 2011 (UTC)
  • They're "unwritten" becuase someone decided to change it without consensus ;) NovaHawk 04:40, October 24, 2011 (UTC)
  • Or was the time limit kicked out with that voting system change? I don't remember NovaHawk 04:42, October 24, 2011 (UTC)
  • Don't think so, it's always been two weeks. I don't know why that's been removed. User:Ajraddatz/sig 13:28, October 24, 2011 (UTC)
  • Restored. Did the 80% thing get kicked out, or should that be restored too? NovaHawk 00:16, October 25, 2011 (UTC)
  • 80% was kicked out. User:Ajraddatz/sig 04:15, October 25, 2011 (UTC)


Clone gunner commander jedi[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Detailed explanation of why you are nominating this user/yourself for adminship.

Support

  • He's been on for a year now and has made more edits than most of the admins, yet he's not even a chat mod. I think he's seriously unappreciated with only 4 barnstars (three of them given to him this month by people shocked that he doesn't have any) created too many articles to count, a valid user to the wiki and a great person which any one on chat will agree and I'll support him till the very end CGCJ FOR ADMIN!!!!!! Prisinorzero (* ) Talk 18:43, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • Go for it! Go Go Go! TreeSound, Master of Hearing 18:45, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • He has experience, and I think he would have the control and discipline to use these tools right. A great friend, he'd make a good administrator in my mind. Just keep calm on chat. :P -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 18:46, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • he is a very hard-worker, and is dedicated to this wiki. go cgcj! User:Darth henry/Sig 18:50, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • Even though he is under-appreciated, this guy is a hared-working, fun-loving user who truley deserves adminship. TheDouter 15:00, October 17, 2011
And? Some people make 60+. o_O --User:Crazed Penguin/Sig1/2ish 03:55, October 30, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

Concerns with maturity, ability to interact well with other users and misuse of chat moderator rights which were removed from his account. User:Ajraddatz/sig 22:13, October 17, 2011 (UTC)


Agent Swipe (2)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Withdrawn

I have been here for a long time. I am a dedicated editor. I feel as if I am friendly and kind to new users. I know a lot about wikia and Brickipedia. And I will us the tools wisely.

Support

  • Basically Support
I am voting yes, For a reason. Firstly, He contributes and is a very nice user. Secondly, He is the co-creator of the Alien Conquest Wiki. He is great with coding too. But my vote is subject to change. --User:Crazed Penguin/Sig3 04:45, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
If you don't mind me asking but why would your vote be subject to change? Agent Swipe(talk)
I might change my mind if a good, valid point is to come across. --User:Crazed Penguin/Sig3 04:48, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for telling me :) Agent Swipe(talk)
Um...what has the second reason got to do with....this. - Kingcjc 10:04, October 23, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Eh. I. Eh. I'm not sure you are active enough or edit enough currently. And, meh. - Kingcjc 10:07, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral You're a great user, but I have to agree with CJC. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 14:01, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
  • Per CJC --Berrybrick (Talk)


Crazed Penguin[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request withdrawn

Well, Before I make my decision on leavin for real-life reasons or not, I realised If I stay these tools could come in handy. You will probably say I'm too new to become admin but On other wikis I contribute to I am mostly admin. My Alien Conquest Wiki is run by me and 2 other main admins. I run most of the Wiki, Interface, User Rights etc. On Brickipedia I am very active. I'm editing everyday and enjoying my time here. Before you oppose and say "I keep reverting your edits so no" I have contributed to many set pages to add prices and I love all users. I try to be as nice as possible to users. I comment on almost of of the blogs with good words, reasoning and more. On the blog about Lego themes getting violent I put a great rant about It. I can get slightly angry at times but usually from school related topics. I am often given awards for my edits and contributions. On all the wikis I contribute to I usually get noticed for a good reason. I hope you understand I can benefit from these tools. I don't want the tools because I think it will make me better, But to help to wiki. Please understand what I'm saying. I could be the first Australian admin. And also Could 1 more admin hurt? -- Sir Penguin! 01:59, October 5, 2011 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  • No
You're leaving, why would you possibly have a need for the tools? Beyond that, concerns with right collecting and maturity. User:Ajraddatz/sig 02:02, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
  • I'm stayin after talking about it with a friend outside this world. -- Sir Penguin! 02:05, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
    Still concerns with maturity, sorry. You're also very new to Brickipedia. Most admins don't get the tools until after at least half a year (though the average would be around on year). You really need to know how things work here, be active and trusted. User:Ajraddatz/sig 02:07, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
    I agree. I didn't get adminship until after a year and a half of hard work. -User:Legoguy2805/sig1 16:06, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
  • Exactly per Ajr, sorry. And not that this matters at all, but there has been at least one Australian admin before, and I'm not exactly sure how ranting on blogs is a good thing :S NovaHawk 06:47, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
    Um... so if I moved to Australia, I'd become a bad admin? User:Captain Jag/sig1 23:14, October 5, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose 

Per others, and that "how could one more admin hurt?" phrase won't work on me. Sorry. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 16:10, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
  • I'd say timing is wrong, and that the conclusion to your argument is flawed, and that Alien Conquest wiki is irrelevant. Time. Edits. Other rights. Also, wasn't Glad Aussie? - Kingcjc 16:28, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but no.
Your a great user, but you need some more experience. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 16:50, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
  • Your not ready yet.
Agent Swipe(talk) 16:52, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
  • He's certainly not ready and people seem to always undo his edits.
User:Clone gunner comanda jedi/signature

Comments

Questions for the candidate

  • (I'm starting a new section here, where we can ask the candidate questions concerning the RfA. This is an open-book exam; feel free to look things up to answer the questions.) Question - What is your view on adminship, and the role of administrators in the community? FB100Z • talk • contribs 16:38, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
    • I view is school cleaner like job, An extra tool to help editing and help the community. The reason I tjink I want it is because I feel i can use These extra tools. -- Sir Penguin! 21:34, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
  • Question - Do people often revert your edits? How do you feel when that happens? FB100Z • talk • contribs 22:39, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
    • Annoyed, I feel all edits should stay. I know everyone makes mistakes. I feel they moniter me and my edits. I hate it when someone reverts them. It's a factual wiki. It dosn't need to be 100% reliable. -- Sir Penguin! 22:41, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
  • Question - Have you been in any editor-editor conflicts? How did you handle the situation? FB100Z • talk • contribs 22:42, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
    • Yes, I have. I let them save first. Kindness is important on Wikia. As a very nice user I always respect people. -- Sir Penguin! 22:43, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
      • Sorry, I meant arguments or disagreements between users :) FB100Z • talk • contribs 22:45, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
        • Ok, I usually sort it out. On chat I sort out alot until it stopped. I try and look at both sides of the arguement. I handle it by Keeping Cool and moving on. -- Sir Penguin! 22:47, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
        • P.S Does this count for my voting? -- Sir Penguin! 22:48, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
        • P.S.S I mean does this help you vote on my rquest? -- Sir Penguin! 22:49, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
          • That's all the questions I have, thanks. I'm doing a sort of "interview" with you to help me and other users learn more about you as a candidate. It isn't an actual vote, but an addendum to the discussion that can persuade or dissuade the !voters. FB100Z • talk • contribs 22:53, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
Do you think I have a chance? Or will I fail miserably. I might Withdraw. -- Sir Penguin! 22:56, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
I'd recommend withdrawing. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:03, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
I'm withdrawing. Too many comments on opposing. Dis is over@! -- Sir Penguin! 00:07, October 6, 2011 (UTC)


Mr. Minifigure[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination successful

Hello. Today I have decided to run for adminastrative rights for numerous reasons. My first reason is, that I am a friendly user that has helped a numerous amount of users: and have detected a bunch of sockpuppets. My second reason is that I work very hard here on Brickipedia and have created 100+ articles since I have joined. I have rollbaker rights along with patroller and chat-mod; and I'm proud to say that I have only kickbanned one person from chat ever. I have contributed every day making about 20 edits or more each day. I do not vandalize and know right from wrong. How can one more admin hurt? User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 14:54, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

Support

  • You don't get many editors like Mr. Minifig these days. Good Guy, Good Editor and Trustworthy. - Kingcjc 15:10, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
  • Definitely. User:Cligra/Sig
  • You're a great editor, and a great friend. Although lately I've noticed somewhat of a negative attitude. That's the only thing I just want to change. But this is one of those times where maturity is key. I think you have that maturity to handle these tools, therefore I support. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 16:26, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
  • Sure

, candidate is mature, etc, and I believe will use the tools well. Just keep that positive attitude up ;) User:Ajraddatz/sig 16:53, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

  • You have helped me through Brickipedia. I defo say yes! Users like you only come around every now and then.--Crazed Penguin talk Maniac, Pyscho, Crazy, just Crazed! 01:10, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
  • An overall great user!--Munchman14 18:18, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
  • Excellent edits! -The Mad Header 22:34, September 14, 2011 (UTC)
  • I would make you an admin but I can't so any why I think your a best-computer freind. Don't feel bad I bet someone will give you a adminship.--Brick country 22:16, September 23, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Leaning towards support. A little bit concerned with that page you created, then proceeded to tag for deletion. I think you know what I'm talking about, and other admins can see it here. User:Ajraddatz/sig 15:13, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
    I'd just like to clarify that the candidate is an otherwise great user, and should be an admin since adminship is no big deal. User:Ajraddatz/sig 15:17, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
    I am so terribly sorry for that and I never ment to make that in the first place. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 16:16, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
    Alright, I'll take your word for it. I've changed my comment accordingly. User:Ajraddatz/sig 16:52, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
  • Berrybrick (Talk) 18:12, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
    • Don't you need a reason? User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 19:07, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
      • Is it really necessary for neutral though? - Kingcjc 16:29, September 14, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral (sorry Mr. Minifigure, I really don't have anything against you, and feel bad about voting on this right after voting against you on the QCG request). It is basically about the incident Ajr listed. If the page wasn't intended to be created, it was either: intended for another wiki or some sort of joke which you didn't intend to go through with and save, but both cases do show a certain immaturity that isn't exactly looked for in an administrator. But, other than that, all other edits do appear to be great. NovaHawk 00:15, September 13, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral Per Nighthawk leader. Sorry, but he has made a valid point.
    User:SKP4472/sig2 06:21, September 14, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral per NHL. User:Captain Jag/sig1 00:29, September 26, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • A veridct shall be reached by the end of tomorrow. User:SKP4472/sig2 20:22, September 23, 2011 (UTC)
    • Closed Veridct: Successful request for adminship. User:SKP4472/sig2 19:19, September 27, 2011 (UTC)


GameGear360 (2)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination successful

Okee, I've known this guy for a long ole time. He may want to say more, but I'll probably cover it all here. A few points I'd like to point out that would make him a great admin candidate:

1. With both Mykheh and Skdhjf no longer admins, we could use someone new.

2. Serious experience here, almost the Yoda of Brickipedia. GG360 has seen a lot here, active or not.

3. This user also has a very extensive knowledge of LEGO, which is very handy as an admin.

4. I honestly trust this user, and you guys should too. He will not mistreat his admin tools, nor will he leave if he gets them. The only reason he went inactive was because he didn't have the admin he had wanted since the first day he started. I know when I started I wanted admin too, that was always my goal. Same goes for GG. I think, as a thanks from Bricki, he deserves it.

Before you leave votes saying he isn't active enough, look at how much his activity has increased. And think, "Why would I oppose this user?" GameGear360 would make an excellent administrator to Brickipedia, you should all see this. And if GG wants to replace this with his own speech/wants to add below, feel free to do so.

Support

Neutral

Oppose

Comments

  • The user has accepted the nomination on chat, SKP witness as well. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 12:37, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
    • Per NBP. I witnessed his acceptance of the nomination. User:SKP4472/sig2 12:41, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
  • Should this request not be closed soon? User:Ajraddatz/sig 21:20, August 31, 2011 (UTC)
  • Closed - Well supported, and nominee has pledged more activity, which answers the neutral comments. - Kingcjc 22:12, September 5, 2011 (UTC)


King of Nynrah[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination successful

I nominate KoN for Admin rhights because he's just awesome and really needs this rights, after nearly 2 years on this wiki!

Support

  • I think he needs some experience in the forums, and to be a little more familiar with other users. But even still he would make a great admin. He has my support, ADMIN BUDDIES! -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 19:41, August 18, 2011 (UTC)
  • He would really make an awesome admin! I wish I could make him one! User:Greeny1/sign1
  • Can't find a reason why not. User:Ajraddatz/sig 21:56, August 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • Would make a great admin, per above. GG 360Gamegear.jpg 15:18, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
  • Sure. - Kingcjc 19:54, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
  • Super duper strong support Oh yeah! User:Cligra/Sig
  • Fantastic editor, nothing more to say other than the best of luck to you! :) User:SKP4472/sig2 09:34, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
  • he deserves it User:Darth henry/Sig1
  • Yep --User:Crazed Penguin/Sig 2 04:43, August 22, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Great user. I really think though he needs to get more into forums and the technical side of Bricki. Allso rollback. Not my final descision. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig

Oppose

Comments


Agent Charge[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination failed.

I have been thinking about nominating myself as an admin for a while, and I'm almost shaking while I right this. I've been on this wiki for over one and a half years and know a lot about it. I can easily see how the tools would be helpful with the work I do here. I try to edit on this wiki as much as possible. Feel free to comment and vote, I'll try to read all your votes, and I'll go happily with whatever happens.

Support

  • Support - You have what I'm looking, experience. All I ask is that you raise your activity here a weee bit. And if you do, I guarantee you'll have more votes like mine. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 18:08, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Per Nerfblasterpro. User:Cligra/Sig
  • Sure, I know how many edits u have done, one thousand too many! --User:Crazed Penguin/Sig 08:41, August 9, 2011 (UTC)
  • Good user, made many good edits. TreeSound, Master of Hearing 08:43, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Neutral - I don't really see you around much, but rummaging through your contributions has shown that you have plenty of experience — exactly what we look for in an admin. FB100Z • talk • contribs 18:57, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral - 100% Per above and I'd know what Ajr and NHL would say. You haven't been active as much, but you have maturity and experience under your belt. I have to be Neutral, sorry. User:Skdhjf/SigT 19:17, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral - Per them. - Kingcjc 19:36, August 2, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral Per above. Also, at times it seems that the user could know more about the wiki. User:Captain Jag/sig1 05:44, August 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral I don't think that you should be one at this point User:Agent Swipe/sig1 --- The dawn is coming...

Oppose

  • Oppose - Hasn't really been all that active. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
  • Not really active, doesn't need the tools. User:Ajraddatz/sig 13:46, August 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • When it comes to adminship, there are a few important qualifications: Experience and understanding of wiki functioning, ability to fairly and justly distribute blocks and bans to vandals/etc, and activity. While I do not doubt that you possess the first two qualities, the last one is lacking.User:BobaFett2/sig2
  • Oppose Per others Berrybrick talk -- "That's Mr. Commander Sergeant to you. 00:00, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • Request for closure - This user needs to be a bit more active before we grant admin tools. Otherwise, I think he'd make an excellent candidate. FB100Z • talk • contribs 17:12, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • Hell No Only one oppose, he can still do it technically...Let it pan out a bit, its only been up a few days I believe. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 17:48, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • kk, I guess I'm a bit too eager on these decisions :3 FB100Z • talk • contribs 17:50, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • Note - Isn't this not using the voting system, but this new one? - Kingcjc 22:13, August 14, 2011 (UTC)


Mykheh[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination withdrawn.

Nomination Withdrawn

Ok, I've talked to this user a lot. I know he has a speech and all that he has prepared specially for this, so I won't say too much. But Mykheh comes to me with a lot of requests that I think, if he had admin, he would be able to fulfill himself. That way I can stay lazy. :P But on a serious note, Mykheh is maturity at its peek. And he notices vandals and unnecessary pages before anyone else. He would make a great admin, the only reason I didn't do this earlier is because experience. But I think he's ready. Also, Mykheh, if wish to re-write this with your speech, that is perfectly fine.

Speech

Why do users wish to become an administrator? Is it for popularity, or for the rights to be higher in ranks than other users? The best reason- to help better the wiki. This is the exact reason why I am applying. I joined Brickipedia on March 2, 2010. My edits are always trusted, even when I began editing. No user has ever reverted any of my edits. Have I had an edit undone? Yes, it was a good faith edit, but it did not comply with our MoS and Policies. But this was back then. I now know how Brickipedia operates, and have participated in forums. Now you say, "How will I use these added rights?" The usage of these rights will be used properly. You have seen the usage of the rights I have now, and my requests placed on the Administrators' notice board. I am a good steward of my Quality Check Group, Rollback, Patroller, and my newly added Chat moderator rights. To date, I have reverted over approximately 15 cases of vandalism and spam, and have requested the blocking of more than seven IP's and users (even three in one day). This goes to show those of you who may think that I may not have enough experience, that I do have the experience required. Now, with the added rights, I will help improve the wiki a great deal (I know nominees say this, but I do mean this). As UltrasonicNXT said, "How can me becoming an admin hurt the wiki?" An arduous task? It is worth it.

"1 year doesn't do it-some people take less than that, some people take more-it's really about dedication, and what you are doing-if you are fulfilling the roles of an admin (eg: finding pages that need to be deleted without a discussiong, warning and reverting vandalizm, etc), then administrative tools would be merited." -BobaFett2(source)


User:Mykheh/sig 02:16, August 7, 2011 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

<comment removed by Skdhjf>
<since the above is removed, I'll remove this also. RM by Mykheh>

  • Neutral as I can't vote- it'll be considered meatpuppetry. (Source) User:Skdhjf/SigT 06:29, August 7, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

The user has accepted the nomination by the way, see my talk page if you want to be sure. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 02:13, August 7, 2011 (UTC)

Mr. Minifigure[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination failed

Hello. Today I have decided to run for adminship in hopes to become an admin. First off, I have made a bunch of aricles on Brickipedia to help it become a better place. Secondly, I always contact an adminastrator when a vandal is doing stuff and I think since I am normally always on that this could be handeled a lot faster. I also help users with problems and try my best to improve our wiki. I do have expierence being an admin on other wikis and I have created two of my own wikis. I hope that you will take the time to vote and before you oppose suggest why I could be better and why you would vote for me. As my signature says keep going forward. This is what keeps me going and lets me see the light at the end of the tunnel. Thank you fro reading. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig

Support

  1. Your a person, so you might as well be an admin to Gladiatoring 22:48, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
  2. User:Agent Swipe/sig1 --- The dawn is coming...
  3. User:Darth henry/Sig1
  4. Galen Marek12311

# TreeSound, Master of Hearing 21:50, July 8, 2011 (UTC)

# User:Bob bricks/sig1 (Vote struck by administrator - 100 MainSpace edits required to vote)

  1. ▂▃▅▆▇█▓▒░Eagleeyedan▒░▓█▇▆▅▃▂ 20:17, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
  2. SWboy 20:25, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Yes, Mr. Minifigure's grammar is not too great, but from what I have seen, his edits have been good ones. And I think, if he got the tools, he would work even harder in helping and protecting the wiki. -MoccerT 00:56, July 15, 2011 (UTC)
    • None of these are valid support votes.... FB100Z • talk • contribs 01:23, July 15, 2011 (UTC)
      • How's that for a valid support? -MoccerT 13:52, July 15, 2011 (UTC)
        • Much better, thanks :) FB100Z • talk • contribs 04:15, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
          • nice, but editing isn't everything. What about forums? I've hardly ever seen him on there (lol I hardly go there either.) But form what I've seen, admins have to be prudent and discerning to close those forums. For example, let's say a user who is a "buddy" of Mr. M and another user who is like his "wsrot enemy" are quarrelling on a forum over something. Sadly, his "enemy" is actually correct, or has more convincing facts. Would Mr. M side with his "friend", or his "enemy"? If he sides with his "friend", people could say that he's biased or something like that. But if he sides with his "enemy", his "friend" could be outraged at him. Yet he'll be demonstrating fairness and logic. If Mr. M is willing to get justice done, and opnely demonstrates this, I'll change me mind. User:Happybrick5/SickSig 04:41, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
  • I do edit on forums but I can't really say I spend to much time on them. Most of the forums I vote on I can't really say don't get that big though where my opinion is used very much because they are so small. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig

Oppose

  1. Sorry, but I have quite a number of concerns regarding your capability as an admin. Firstly, your skill in the English language. I've noticed that your spelling of words and grammar is relatively inconsistent. Also, your understanding of tenses in a paragraph is, forgive me for saying so, rather limited in various instances. Secondly, I believe you definitely need a lot more experience. You've only been here for about three months, and from what I have seen, your experience in conflicts is quite limited. Besides acting quite rashly in some of your previous cases of conflict, I still tend to see you at times the reverting of good faith edits. Please do not take this as an insult, but rather view this as constructive criticism. User:Fudgepie/sig 19:03, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Unfortunately, I must agree with above. You're a great user, but this request comes a couple months two early. User:Ajraddatz/sig 19:05, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Sorry, but I have to agree with the others. --User:BobaFett12d/Sig. - In Range. Take a Shot. 19:53, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Weak oppose - Mr. Minifigure is an excellent editor with great potential, but I think he could a bit more experience. FB100Z • talk • contribs 17:46, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Per BZ 3000 Sorry, just not enough experience. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 18:07, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
  6. Per Byz and Ajr. User:Captain Jag/sig1 21:15, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
  7. Again! how i desteest power-hungrey individuals! i've got ntos rights, and I'm proud of it! User:Happybrick5/SickSig 01:47, July 11, 2011 (UTC)(Not enough edits to vote)
    • This is not a valid reason for an oppose vote. It is also a perfect example of why we need that new voting system. FB100Z • talk • contribs 18:53, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
      • And in that case 9/9 of the above supporting votes are also not valid. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 01:15, July 15, 2011 (UTC)
        • Okay, so I soudned like a goof ball. Here's my valid reason. Mr. M just needs to like his rights. Take it slow and easy. THere's no rush. And it would help to be more active in other parts of the wiki. Admins after all seem to be invovled in many things. User:Happybrick5/SickSig 02:29, July 15, 2011 (UTC)

# Etanretla 15:43, July 14, 2011 (UTC) People were saying I am too new to vote. I suppose I am a bit new to vote, I've only just joined. Etanretla 17:06, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

  1. The time is not right, I sense. (/end attempt at yoda voice) - Kingcjc 18:41, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Weak oppose. Per Kingcjc - note, this is nothing personal, I just feel you need a bit more experience first. User:Tatooine/SigT 16:09, July 15, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Sorry, I just think you need more experience. User:Mykheh/sig 16:54, July 15, 2011 (UTC)
  4. I must agree with Byzantium.User:BobaFett2/sig2

Comments

  • Neutral: I think that you have the potential to be a good admin, but I'm not sure at the moment...Do you have rollbacker rights? You could definitely use those well. User:Cligra/Sig
  • hmmm CjcDonut.png Kingcjc 08:01, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral Per Cligra, I just think some time needs to go by. I think adminship is being awarded way too much lately, but I think, given some time, this user would make a good admin. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 18:02, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
  • This is exactly what I'm talking about. Look at those supports. Except for a few, most users have hardly participated in anything other than editing and blogging, and yet vote in favour. Ha! I can tell a conspiracy is brewing. User:Happybrick5/SickSig 20:37, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
  • Happybrick I have looked at previous versions of your userpage and you said that you were always willing to promote a user. What happened to that guy? I was a wikia contributer back then and saw that you were a great user. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
  • The new voting system was meant to sort this out. Why aren't we using it? User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 15:36, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
  • Like I said, this is due to people taking the idea of an admin wrong (both sides) and just a flaw with democracy. Also, I wouldn't suggest it is bad that they have edited.... - Kingcjc 11:25, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
  • I'm not making myslef clear. I meant to say thye just edit and comment on blogs. That's a good thing. But they've hardly participated on anything else on this wiki, like on forums where issues are discussed. And suddenly, just this one time, they vote for someone. Just this time for one person. No, they don't even look at the others. They jsut vote once and that's it. Isn't it odd? Or mayble I'm still hyperventilating from eating that death by chocolate. 12 pounds of the thickest, sweetest, chocolate fondue found anywhere in the galaxy! Yummy... I'm going insane User:Happybrick5/SickSig 16:19, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
  • You make complete since and I'm just saying I will not withdraw since tommorrow is the last day. Happybrick you have your own opinion ike everyone else does and I respect that. So let's just leave it at that. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
    • I thought they went for two weeks... - Kingcjc 17:08, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
  • Can't find anything, but it will be closed by the 22nd July, as I will be gone the day after for a week. (So, basicly 2 weeks.) - Kingcjc 18:41, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
    Is it true you'd have to wait 3 months before you can renominate yourself? I thught I saw than somewhere, but I can't seemed to find it right now. User:Happybrick5/SickSig 02:32, July 15, 2011 (UTC)
    It's two. That's the mistake I made. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 15:17, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
  • Anyone else agree this is the most organized page on Brickipedia? :P -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 02:55, July 15, 2011 (UTC)
  • Request for closure. The headcount is pretty close to a tie, but the general consensus seems to be Oppose. FB100Z • talk • contribs 00:51, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
  • The advantages of the new voting system which people love to reject are coming back to haunt us. FB100Z • talk • contribs 02:18, July 23, 2011 (UTC)


Agent Swipe[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination failed

I've been here for some time now and I believe that I have helped out, and that I could use the extra tools. I would use them wisely.

Support

# As nominator User:Agent Swipe/sig1 --- The dawn is coming... 22:48, July 10, 2011 (UTC)

  1. He is a wonderful editor and I believe he deserves this. :) --MoccerT 22:50, July 10, 2011 (UTC)

#As epic friend User:1999bug/sig1 22:50, July 10, 2011 (UTC) Not enough mainspace edits.

  1. User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 13:48, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
  2. GG 360Gamegear.jpgOne Year on Brickipedia 13:59, July 11, 2011 (UTC) 3000 edits is pretty dedicated. I think he deserves it.
  3. Amazing editor! Such a big help on Brickipedia! Could be even greater with better privileges. G4 21:41, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
  4. If Mr. M might be, you definitely should be. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 17:58, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Swipe is responsible with his tools, and learns quickly from his mistakes. Strong support. FB100Z • talk • contribs 18:58, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
    Some of the folks in the below section have good points, weak support. FB100Z • talk • contribs 02:21, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
  6. User:SKP4472/sig2 15:32, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. No. Just no. User:Happybrick5/SickSig 01:29, July 11, 2011 (UTC)(Not enough edits to vote.)
    • Haha, very funny. What I've been trying to says is while this dude seems to be a positive and ougoing guy, I don't think he's got the ability to handle adminisrative stuff. It's like you're a nice good kid, and how can you expect this nice, goodie two shoes to handle something like running a business in Cybernetic robotic construction? I'm Just speaking with my limited voice. Don't worry, I'm not "breaking" the rules by voting. Just saying waht needs to be said. User:Happybrick5/SickSig 15:37, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
  2. At the moment, I really don't think this is a good idea. User:BobaFett2/sig2
    • Can both of you provide more specific reasons? Thanks. FB100Z • talk • contribs 18:57, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
      • If I'm not mistaken, Swipe is underage. There's also the fact that I just don't think it's worth having more admins right now. I have no issue with quantity, but the fact that many people are complaining and nobody is actually doing much about it tells you that you could focus on things other than that. User:BobaFett2/sig2
        • Right on the money. +100. Also, look at my anology on Mr. M's please. Could also serve in this respect. User:Happybrick5/SickSig 04:50, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Strong oppose. Not right now. One of the reasons I supported the admin noms Cligra and UltrasonicNXT was because of their maturity. I can see that they are, or over a certain age. I think Brickipedia needs such admins. User:Mykheh/sig 16:51, July 15, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Very strong oppose. This is nothing against you Swipe, but it seems that you have little to no experience/understanding in the Administrative branch. I don't see you much active in the community as much -- and there are others I'd rather nominate besides yourself.:) User:Tatooine/SigT 21:35, July 15, 2011 (UTC)
    • Who says he can't learn after he gets his tools? You learn how to edit after you receive editing privileges, if I'm not mistaken. FB100Z • talk • contribs 04:18, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
  • Hah, so you say we should pick up a random user and give him admin rights and say "Learn as you go bud!" That = stupid. User:Tatooine/SigT 16:43, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
  • Yes! It's like allowing someone to drive a lamgoghini (or however it's spelled) so they can drive better. How ridicoulous is that. User:Happybrick5/SickSig 01:53, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • @FB100Z Hey, I don't have any of those so called "user rights" and I already know how to edit. Just change something on a page for the better, and then click publish. You don't even need to be a registered user to do that. :p User:Happybrick5/SickSig 15:40, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • Straw man attack. Swipe has plenty of experience with editing; this "random user" you select probably doesn't. You both have fairly good points regarding his maturity, however. FB100Z • talk • contribs 00:45, July 23, 2011 (UTC)
  1. Weak Oppose Swipe is a dedicated user but I don't think he is ready for the tools yet. Two months to early. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
  • lol. He's been here longer than you, and you think he isn't as capable as you? I know you didtn' say that, but it seems odd from someone who's been here almost half as long as Swipe. :P User:Happybrick5/SickSig 02:09, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • Hey Swipe unfortunatly you can't vote for yourself. I wish we could. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
  • Hmm.. Thinking about it - though I thought you said you waiting for a month or so. - a link - Kingcjc 11:16, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
Yeah but I was thinking about it and I thought "Eh why not." User:Agent Swipe/sig1 --- The dawn is coming...
  • You would get alot more support if you had waited, but I will still support. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 13:47, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
  • Why is Happybrick's vote stricken? - Kingcjc 14:42, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
  • He doesn't have the amount of edits required. --MoccerT 14:59, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
  • We haven't enforced that for ages and he still has votes on other votes. Just sayin' - Kingcjc 15:03, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
  • Excatly. At least I give reasons. And I don't see you doing that to anyone else who might not have the edits, MOccerT. Hmm? User:Happybrick5/SickSig 20:40, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
  • Uh I checked everyone and "MOccerT" MT and he has over 1,000 edits. User:Agent Swipe/sig1 --- The dawn is coming...

UltrasonicNXT (2)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination successful

Hello. After two months since my previous request I am going to nominate myself for adminiship. I have been here on Brickipedia for over six months and believe that I would be a worthy candidate for adminship, and that me having these rights would ultimately help Brickipedia. Over the past few months I have nominated many articles for (sometimes speedy) deletion. I am an active QCG member, and am active in the forums. I have left many messages on good and bad faith, users and IPs, talk pages. I have reverted many bad/incorrect edits, and added many maintenance tags to pages that need it. Since my last nomination, I have become more experienced, and I ask those of you who said "We have enough admins" last time to consider this: How can me becoming an admin hurt the wiki?

Thankyou for reading, User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 17:16, July 7, 2011 (UTC)

Support

  1. Go! User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
  2. Considering two admins left yesterday, the summer months have more vandalism than winter, and this user is an ideal candidate, I say yes. User:Ajraddatz/sig 17:18, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
    It's winter in half the world (Southern Hemisphere) User:FB100Z/Smiley User:Captain Jag/sig1 04:56, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Clearly someone who can be trusted with these tools, and who also demonstrates maturity in conflicts. Totally support. =) User:Fudgepie/sig 17:19, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
  4. You get my full support NXT! I'm really impressed by your work here at Brickipedia, keep it up! @Ajr: Which two admins left? :( User:SKP4472/sig brickiversary 18:18, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
    NHL & SKD :( User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 18:37, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
  5. You definitely deserve to be an admin. I know you will do a great job. --User:BobaFett12d/Sig. - In Range. Take a Shot. 18:49, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
  6. Per all others! User:Cligra/Sig
  7. yes yes yes! User:Darth henry/Sig
  8. Great, mature and experience user. Has the ability to handle the extra tools. User:Tatooine/SigT 06:25, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
  9. The user will make a great admin. User:Mykheh/sig 17:40, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
  10. User:Captain Jag/sig1 21:14, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
  11. I thought I already voted for some reason. Still, support! -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 18:04, July 9, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Retrieved from "https://en.brickimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brickipedia:Requests_for_Adminship/Archive2&oldid=677981"