35,558
edits
m |
|||
===Vote===
<big><big><span style="color:#FF0000">Please note- the following section will close on Thursday November 27</span></big></big>
====Keep ratings as they are====
#To be honest, I quite like our current system. It's easy for me to recognize all the article classes except maybe c1 and FA. But the difference between c4 and c3, or c2 and c1? No problem. I like that there are exact states a page can achieve, and you always know exactly what to add in order to advance it. With what Nova is suggesting, it sounds like the lines will be a little less definite, or at least less easy to attain. {{C|I also don't really see why we're changing so many things like this. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" (or whatever that saying is). :P And this doesn't seem broken to me. Why go through an overhaul like this when there are articles waiting to be edited up to c2/1/FA?}} [[User:Jeyo|Jeyo]] ([[User talk:Jeyo|talk]]) 06:11, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
#: Well, the idea was to make them more definite and easier to rate :P Unrelated note- there is another forum about this made by CJC since then, I'm working on merging this and other forums back into here when I get more time. [[User:NovaHawk|NovaHawk]] ([[User talk:NovaHawk|talk]]) 06:46, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
====Move to a 4-tier system (stub,
# Per reasoning above {{User:NovaFlare/sig}} 03:24, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
# This seems most sensible, a lot of our articles are closer to "average" than they are Class 4 (despite being called otherwise). -[[User:NBP3.0|NBP3.0]] ([[User talk:NBP3.0|talk]]) 13:27, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
* NXT, if you wanted to have a separate entry, please add, I think our ideas are pretty similar though. @Meiko, sorry if I didn't describe your idea well enough in the title, please feel free to reword. @Berrybrick: I haven't forgotten out your idea on the workdesk, but since it could go with a page regardless of the rating system, maybe we could discuss in a separate section? I like the idea though. {{User:NovaFlare/sig}} 03:24, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
:* It was my "great compromise." :P Yeah, we can discuss it in another section. I'm fine with either of the above suggestions to change the system as long as it is clearer how to improve the page. [[User:Berrybrick|Berrybrick]] ([[User talk:Berrybrick|talk]]) 05:39, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
The colours should be purple, red, orange, yellow, green, blue not red, red, Amber, green, blue, blue. This only means changing two colours which isn't hard, and would but the colours in their scientific order. {{User:Soupperson1/Sig}}▼
<div style="background:#FFCCCC;">
==Rating icons==
'''Please hold off on this topic until "Should we change or remove any/all ratings?" has been resolved'''
▲* The colours should be purple, red, orange, yellow, green, blue not red, red, Amber, green, blue, blue. This only means changing two colours which isn't hard, and would but the colours in their scientific order. {{User:Soupperson1/Sig}}
</div>
|