35,558
edits
m |
|||
<div style="background:#FFCCCC;">
:* Telling people what to actually edit was an idea I had earlier, so I still support it. [[User:Berrybrick|Berrybrick]] ([[User talk:Berrybrick|talk]]) 19:50, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
* Stuff, broken into convenient dot points:
** I really like the idea of a box at the bottom of a page saying what's missing. But how would it be done? I really don't want to go around and do that manually.
** ''This has led to the suggestion that the QCG should check the ratings on articles to ensure they are accurate often, which is obviously never done and never will be - it is labour intensive and unimportant to the site as a whole''
*** This is partially due to [[Special:MassRatings]] preserving ratings after a page is moved, for example, if you have page "A" with a rating of c3, and move it to page "B", and then change "B" to c2, "A" will still show up in MassRatings, and with a rating of c3. So, half the time when you're going through C5 or unrated articles, you're clicking them and getting redirected to other pages with actual ratings (or ratings higher than c5). So it's very hard to check on such things.
** The idea of having a difference between "stub" and "incomplete" is that "incomplete" doesn't scream "help, I am a terrible page!"- they'd have at least a partially filled out infobox and a lead. The stub idea is for awful pages like [http://en.brickimedia.org/index.php?title=Mogans_Johansen&oldid=871252|this] which are in immediate attention
** {{C|Oh, and bad CJC, go get your rights back :D }}
:{{User:NovaHawk/sig}} 00:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
==Voting procedures for ratings (if any)==
|