Talk:Invizable

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Invizable article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject. The forum can be found here
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Brickipedia? Welcome!	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Article milestones Date Process Result Please add type
Current status: Please add type

Since he appears in both Ninjago, and Ultra Agents, what theme should he be listed under? --LK901 14:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Ultra Agents first as that's the set he appears in, and then Ninjago. Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

Just UA because Ninjago was only a cameo, unless he does appear in sets there later. Berrybrick (talk) 15:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

(I'm not sure why everyone refers to him as just being a cameo- he's one of the main competitors in the tournament, with probably the second or third-most amount of screentime amongst the competitors not including the ninja and Skylor :S) Either way, since he hasn't been released phsically in a Ninjago set and non-physical info shouldn't appear in an infobox of a minifigure that's been physically released, Ninjago shouldn't be there. NovaHawk 21:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

(I haven't seen the show but I assume that it is either people like me who make assumptions, or because it's an extended cameo. :P ) Berrybrick (talk) 21:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Well, then he is a "guest star". You wouldn't a guest star on the Simpsons was a part of the main cast (terrible example really, and not just because Marcia Wallace guest starred in hundreds of episodes, Kelsey Grammar in probably 15 or 20, etc...) CJC95 (talk) 21:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)