Brickipedia:Requests for Adminship/Archive1

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki

Cligra[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination successful

Having lost two administrators, Brickipedia will be left vulnerable to attacks from vandals. Why am I nominating this user in particular? Well, Cligra has been here for nine months, producing quality edits, and participating in forums. He also uses his QCG member tools responsibly, and the added tools will be used responsibly. Cligra has been a great user, and has yes, other users are doing what he has been doing, but the character of that individual does matter- positive, and edifying character. User:Mykheh/sig 17:02, July 7, 2011 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nom. User:Mykheh/sig 17:02, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Very well said. I hope to be one to but for now yes. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig
  3. We could both get our noms through at the same time! User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 17:23, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Sure. Another admin to help out with stuff never hurts. User:Ajraddatz/sig 17:42, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
  5. You deserve this. Another admin wont hurt. --User:BobaFett12d/Sig. - In Range. Take a Shot. 18:52, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
  6. CjcDonut.png Kingcjc 19:39, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
  7. Heck yeah! User:Agent Swipe/sig1 --- The dawn is coming...
  8. Just for fun, as NXT suggests, why don't we get both of these passed at the same time? FB100Z • talk • contribs 01:07, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
  9. Just a great, positive user who would benefit with the added tools. =D User:Fudgepie/sig 01:11, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
  10. User:Captain Jag/sig1 21:14, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
  11. You're a great user! Keep up the good work! User:SKP4472/sig brickiversary 21:45, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
  12. Only if he grabs me another ice cream sandwich... -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 17:59, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
  13. Cligra deserves this because of the greatness others percieve in him. User:Happybrick5/SickSig 04:45, July 11, 2011 (UTC)(Not enough edits to vote)
    • Great, and you let others who have less edits vote. How nice. I'm just jumping up and down with joy. ha...ha....ha.....hmm User:Happybrick5/SickSig 15:49, July 17, 2011 (UTC)
  14. Of course.User:BobaFett2/sig2
  15. Per the above. User:1999bug/sig
  16. User:Darth henry/Sig1
  17. Yes. User:TheGrandEditor/sig1

Oppose

Comments

  • As Ajraddatz would say, has the user accepted the nomination? User:Fudgepie/sig 17:32, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Yes, he has. I made sure I contacted him before I nominated him. User:Mykheh/sig 17:34, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Um...new discussion system, any1? FB100Z • talk • contribs 20:06, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
    • I just presume we use this for votes as its...well, easier. Its a simple do you support. Also, surely by IAR, then we could use whatever system whenever, as long as it helps the wiki. CjcDonut.png Kingcjc 20:12, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
      • Still hasn't been a verdict on the forum, so we could continue to use the old system for now. Actually, also, I think that the old system tends to work better for Brickipedia, so we might as well switch back to it. User:Ajraddatz/sig 20:14, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
        • Actually, we can do what Wikipedia does (yes, I know, we aren't Wikipedia and all that crap and yada yada yada) and still have the Support and Oppose votes, just separated into different sections. It's still a discussion, however. FB100Z • talk • contribs 01:06, July 8, 2011 (UTC)


Fudgepie[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination Successful

Hello everyone, it's my honour to present Fudgepie as a candidate for adminship here. He failed a request around two months ago due to the fact that he was new here. Since that, Fudgepie has been heavily involved in the encyclopedia, and specifically administrative areas. He holds rollback and patroller rights, is active in reverting vandalism as well as content improvement. He is a member of the QCG, and very active in the article rating process. Fudgepie also has a history of keeping a cool head in conflicts, and being as neutral as possible. All in all, an excellent candidate for the mop, and I hope that you'll agree with me. User:Ajraddatz/sig 19:16, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator. User:Ajraddatz/sig 19:16, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Sure. -- stercus accidit -- cjc 19:18, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Per nom. Fudgepie has all the stuff to be an admin. FB100Z • talk • contribs 19:22, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
    Technically, not yet, as he would need admin rights to be an admin XD -- stercus accidit -- cjc 19:24, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
    I guess :/ Also, Fudgepie is neutral and phlegmatic, making him a great third party for conflicts and debates. FB100Z • talk • contribs 19:28, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Yeah! User:Cligra/Sig
  5. Great idea. Great guy. --User:BobaFett12d/Sig. - In Range. Take a Shot. 20:47, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
  6. GO!!! --Keep Going Forward... 01:08, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
  7. Very tempted to oppose just because of the first line of Ajr's comment below (and I don't mean this as a joke), but that wouldn't at all be fair to Fudgepie. I can definitely see him being good addition to the admin team, and one more admin can't hurt. NovaHawk 02:38, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
  8. Sorry Fudgepie, been meaning to vote for you on this. And you have my support; Brickipedia is honoured to have you as an editor here, and to be apart of the Administrator Board. (Just felt like calling us that.:S) User:Tatooine/Template:Tatooine/Sig 03:38, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
  9. You get my Full Support on this Fudgepie! Keep up the excellent work! :) User:SKP4472/sig2 11:04, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
  10. You have my support! User:Mykheh/sig 02:12, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
  11. I sure could use another morning person to have while editing. ;) Happy ajr? -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 16:37, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
  12. Of Corse TreeSound, Master of hearing 07:59, June 9, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • User accepted the nomination on his talk page yesterday. User:Ajraddatz/sig 19:19, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
  • One more thing - don't anyone give me the "we don't need more admins" crap. As I've said many times, there is no limit to the number of admins we can have, and in this case the more the merrier. More admins means that vandalism is removed faster, sysop tasks get done faster, etc. Also, I'd like to point out that Fudgepie is active at times when no/few admins are (the early morning for me), so this is definitely a plus in that him having sysop tools will allow vandalism in that time frame to be removed faster. User:Ajraddatz/sig 19:48, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
  • Per last lines above. Fudgepie is active in the morning when some admins aren't. User:Mykheh/sig 02:14, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

"we don't need more admins" crap........I don't need you telling me how to vote, or anything else Gladiatoring 03:35, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

I am well within my rights to express my opinion. I'm not telling you how to vote, I'm giving supporting evidence for my argument. (as well as trying to debunk the ridiculous notion that we somehow have a magical limit on the number of admins that we can have) User:Ajraddatz/sig 03:41, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
Not meaning to intrude, but I personally do not understand why you are so aggravated, Glad. Ajraddatz wasn't directly referring that comment to you, and he's not telling you how to vote or anything like that. If there is something that is hurting you, Gladiatoring, I can understand your bitterness and anger. After all, I was once mugged at gunpoint by a very good friend of mine and his accomplices. But will I let that affect my life, making me bitter and remorse toward others, or lashing out at people to release the pain within me? For me, I realized I had to learn to let it go, seeing I could not undo the damage of the past. But I can change the future. That is why I'm suggesting that perhaps it is better to think before you type, as words can be a double edged sword. User:Fudgepie/sig 04:14, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • Gladiatoring - Per above. Ajraddatz wasn't persuading/telling you to support the nomination, he was simply stating his opinion to us. And it seems as though you're mad about something. Please don't bring your personal life and/or issues to the community. This is what starts big, nasty fights, and some great users almost left because of these fights. You can leave Brickipedia, if you're going to keep acting like a child. We will not tolerate these actions anymore towards any member of our community. User:Tatooine/Template:Tatooine/Sig 05:51, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
Firstly you give no supporting evidence at all, you only give you opinion , It is NOT your right to tell people that to many admins is not good reasoning, or any other reason they may, or may not have, simple as that pal ..........To you users who seem to think you can tell me your opinion of what someone else meant , you got no idea, and I am not interested in what you think. Gladiatoring 06:18, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
Then don't read what I say, lol. I'm still going to express my opinions. User:Ajraddatz/sig 13:51, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
Glad, no offence, but "too many admins" really isn't a good argument. How can more admins hurt the wiki! Look what happened on my admin nomination. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 15:56, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • Gladiatoring - Then you have a problem.... Simple as that. You're welcome to leave anytime if you feel we are telling you how to vote, or if you think we are too narrow minded. Its that easy. User:Tatooine/Template:Tatooine/Sig 16:30, June 6, 2011 (UTC)


UltrasonicNXT[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination Failed

Hello everyone, I'm nominating UltrasonicNXT for adminship. UltrasonicNXT has been active on Brickipedia since December of last year, and in that time he (or she) has established themself as a dedicated, clueful editor. I believe that sysop tools will aid in their ability to help improve Brickipedia. User has accepted nomination on my talk page. User:Ajraddatz/sig 19:42, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

Support

  1. User:Ajraddatz/sig 19:42, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
    Of course.:) User:Tatooine/Template:Tatooine/Sig 19:46, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Pur Ajr User:Agent Swipe/sig1User:Agent Swipe/sig 2.0
  3. I really see no reason why not. User:Cligra/Sig
  4. Meh, why not? -- stercus accidit -- cjc 18:50, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Adminship isn't a political position, and thus I consider the "we-have-enough-admins" argument to be invalid. FB100Z • talk • contribs 19:28, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Nothing whatsoever against the user, just don't see a need for another admin. Also, maybe they should have some experience with rollback first? NovaHawk 01:24, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
    Rollback is for those active in countervandalism - not all sysop tools are about countervandalism, and I doubt that this user would get into that heavily anyways. Beyond that, to both opposers here, how would another admin hurt? All that would happen is that pages would get deleted faster, things implemented sooner, and an overall evening out of the admins' workload. There really isn't any harm to having lots of admins, only benefits. User:Ajraddatz/sig 02:57, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Sorry, but per above. Also, I feel the user may need a bit more experience. From a quick glance, I've noticed that most of the admins here appear to be active for at least 7-8 months before becoming admins. User:Fudgepie/sig 02:29, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Per others --User:BobaFett12d/Sig. - Simple Souls trying to make their way in the Universe... 19:46, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
  4. I don't think that they are ready just yet. Also I think needs to have Rollback Rights plus we don't need a new admin even though two aren't on here any more. Keep Going Forward... 22:28, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
    Why isn't he ready yet? Why did he need to have experience with rollback? Why don't we need more admins? User:Ajraddatz/sig 22:36, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Per NHL, he has the experience, but we aren't really in need of an admin at the moment. Otherwise, I would support. :) -Nerfblasterpro: Always supplying the boomsauce...Maverick.jpg 22:42, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
    Why don't we need another admin at the moment? See my paragraph below. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:13, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
  6. Per Fudgepie. User:Mykheh/sig 18:58, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • Neutral: NHL persuaded me.:P User:Tatooine/Template:Tatooine/Sig 02:57, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • ("Wait what? We're having an admin's night out?" was my first response to this after I saw "evening out" with Ajr's comment :D) I think UltrasonicNXT's a great user, but any bad pages have been deleted very quickly as far as I can see, and I just don't see the point to having another admin right now. NovaHawk 03:28, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
    Plus, it would just kill to be on the same side as me :P User:Ajraddatz/sig 03:33, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
    Per Ajr NHL. Really good user, but no need for another admin right now, sorry. User:Samdo994/sig1 11:11, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
    Not meaning to intervene, but 2195 Jubel 3+ Bulk has been up for speedy deletion for over a week, so they're not really getting deleted that quickly. User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature 14:12, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • We are having an admins night out? You paying Ajr? cjc 08:34, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
    good luck with that :P User:Ajraddatz/sig 13:15, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Just wondering, in what country is this "admin's night out"? User:Captain Jag/sig1 20:08, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
    Imagination Land cjc 20:26, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
  • A real-life Brickipedia meeting would be pretty neat...not just admins, of course. FB100Z • talk • contribs 23:43, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
  • Okey people, I'm kinda sick of hearing about this "enough admins" stuff. Why can't we have more admins? Is it going to physically hurt the wiki to have more people who can delete pages/block vandals/etc? If so, how? As it is, at some times of the day vandalism can go untreated for hours - that isn't acceptable, and we clearly need more admins if that is happening. Adminship is just a toolbox, there is no status associated with it, so why is this such a big fricking deal? User:Ajraddatz/sig 03:06, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
    I didn't say there are enough admins (okay, I know other people did). I have nothing against UltrasonicNXT... just feel he needs a bit more experience, that's all. User:Fudgepie/sig 16:44, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
    Lack of experience is a valid reason to oppose, however, saying that we don't need more admins isn't. As I've said, the more admins, the better. User:Ajraddatz/sig 21:44, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
    Absoluteley agree with you, Ajr. I'll say maybe a month or so and a bit more experience with counter-vandalism and UltrasonicNXT would have my vote =) User:Fudgepie/sig 00:29, May 15, 2011 (UTC)


Tatooine (2)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request Successful

I am requesting Administrator rights for various reasons. They will all be pointed out in the statement below: I am Tatooine, you all may know me by now. I have been here since June 06, 2010 (almost 10 months) and I have learned a LOT these past months. First of all, I am trustworthy, welcoming, honest user, who will at any point help. I've helped many users with questions, coding and much more. I try my best to be an active user, making at least as much as edits can make out of the available time slot I have. Even sometimes if I'm sick. I also know Brickipedia's Manual of Style, Category Structures, and other policies. Also, I am user who tries to participate in Community forums. I was given Patroller rights. Used them well. Then Rollback rights. I used them even better. The same will go for Sysop rights.

Within the 10 month duration that I have been here, there has been good times and bad. Especially Vandalism (Bad time). I deal with vandalism with no toleration, especially when it comes to coarse language on the mainspace. I revert them as fast as I can (Especially on my iPod [When I had it]) One time, sadly, a vandalizer even named the page they created with a swear word. It finally got deleted in about 5 minutes; but how I so wanted to delete it at the spot. Now if a user does a good faith, not compliant with the MoS edit, I will tell them politely on their talk page what they did wrong and how to fix it.

The last time I requested was two months ago with 1800 edits, and I was told I that I had a lack of experience. (I did) But now with edits, and a full understanding of our Policies; I feel that I am ready to be an Administrator. User:Tatooine/Template:Tatooine/Sig 00:52, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

Support

  1. Good user, active in counter-vandalism, experienced, friendly. Definitely support. User:Captain Jag/sig1 01:20, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
  2. I totally agree with you. You definitely have the experience and the knowledge. Plus, you are such a nice user. ;)User:Fudgepie/sig 00:01, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Tatooine has always struck me as an outstanding user. --Cligra A-Pet.png 02:32, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Strong support - Absolutely no issues with this user getting the tools. Mature, experienced, and would obviously use them well. Best of luck to you, sir. User:Ajraddatz/sig 03:45, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Strong Support - Very mature and experienced, I think that the rights are well deserved. User:Lego lord/sig.1
  6. Strong Support - Per everyone! You hold all of the aspects that I'd want from an Administrator! Best of luck! :) User:SKP4472/sig2 18:58, April 13, 2011 (UTC)
  7. Per SKP4472. (And plus, we could always use another positive admin).Berrybrick talk -- "Berry Has Come To Warn You Sir." 19:05, April 13, 2011 (UTC)
  8. User:Agent Swipe/sig1User:Agent Swipe/sig 2.0
  9. Per SKP4472 --User:BobaFett12d/Sig. - Drop your weapon, Fett. Which one? 23:59, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
  10. go tatooine go User: Darth henry

Oppose

Comments


Fudgepie[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination Failed

Fudgepie may have only been here for a short time but he has helped out so much for creating new articles.

Support

  1. User:Agent Swipe/sig150px User:Agent Swipe/sig 2.0 --- The dawn is coming...
  2. User:Lego lord/sig.1
  3. --User:BobaFett12d/Sig. 00:18, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Afraid I haven't seen much that would enable me to support. - cjc 19:57, March 29, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Sorry, nothing personal but you haven't much time and experience on the site. Sorry pal. User:Tatooine/Template:Tatooine/Sig 22:07, March 29, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Per above (sorry) NovaHawk 03:17, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Weak oppose - In my opinion, you are a great user who has the maturity to handle the sysop tools. However, I feel that you haven't been on the wiki long enough, and as such I haven't seen you in conflict, or in a dispute, and as such I have no way of knowing how you will handle such an incident when it arises in the future. I think that you would use the tools well, however I'd like to see you get a few more months of experience under your belt before that time. Sorry, User:Ajraddatz/sig 15:21, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Same as above.User:BobaFett2/sig2 16:50, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Berrybrick talk -- "Character Will Be Tested. . . ." 19:09, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
  2. I am neutral, for now at least. --Cligra A-Pet.png 19:12, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Neutral, per Ajraddatz. Sorry. User:SKP4472/sig2 19:26, March 30, 2011 (UTC)
  4. I'm neutral. I think that he has administrative potential, but I am not sure about granting it yet. User:Captain Jag/sig1 00:16, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Comments


Lcawte[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination Failed

Lcawte has been a dedicated and trusted member of Brickipedia since May 18 2009. Though the last few months he has not done much mainspace editing, he continues to run a bot on the site and deal with the technical and administrative side of the wiki, such as javascript, irc and logo creation. Lcawte is considered by many as a "de facto" admin. He may not have the powers but has many skills that other members of the administrative team need help in, and so in Lcawte you would get an admin who knows these technical things. --- the cake is a lie ---- Cjc 23:01, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Support

  1. --- the cake is a lie ---- Cjc 23:01, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
  2. --CligraPeace.jpg 23:03, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
  3. I guarantee that he is fantastic. There is no limit or "correct" number of administrators, so I don't see why not.User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:07, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Lcawte is a good contributor and a trusted member of the Brickipedia community, he patrols the recent changes and is on irc daily. He is also known for his skill with, and understand of, MediaWiki and has plenty of experience in using the Administrative tools. He also runs a bot on this wiki and assists with other tasks. While working with him on other projects, I've found him to be a good and responsible Administrator. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 23:20, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
  5. He such a good editor, i thought he was an admin the past year Clone Commander FoxCommander Fox.png 23:48, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
    #User:Tatooine/Template:Tatooine/Sig 23:53, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
    #NovaHawk 00:44, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
    #--User:FreddyderHamster/sig 12:31, March 20, 2011 (UTC) (Vote struck- you must have 100 mainspace edits to vote on user rights requests)
  6. User:Captain Jag/sig1 18:41, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
  7. Agent Charge: Agents-Logo.pngDown with Vandalism 03:19, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
  8. An editor deserving of it. He's one of the veteran users of this wiki. We are so lucky to have him! A few days ago, we were on IRC, and he was trying to get as much editing done as possible, plus do his homework at the same time. Now that's dedicated! -- Will k PotC sets coming soon! (nitwit, blubber, oddment, tweak) 06:45, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
  9. --dog4591/Mugsiedoodle/TheParadoxBug 20:02, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I don't see a point of Lcawte being an admin at the moment, he doesn't really do mainspace, so what would he do with the rights? User:Lego lord/sig.1 ---- reply back
    Kinda explained what he does above >_> --- the cake is a lie ---- Cjc 23:11, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
    Yeah, he made a bot so he wouldn't have to do it the hard way... User:Lego lord/sig.1 ---- reply back
    No, he made a bot so that he could help us while doing something else.User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:15, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
    I know, it is good, but that would mean that he doesn't edit as much as others. User:Lego lord/sig.1 ---- reply back
    No, he doesn't edit as much as others because he has to deal with a lot of other wikis.User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:18, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
    That has no bearing to him becoming an admin on Brickipedia. User:Lego lord/sig.1 ---- reply back
    I should have the right to my own opinion. User:Lego lord/sig.1 ---- reply back
    Nobody said otherwise.User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:23, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
    Yes I have a lot of wikis to deal with, less now, my wiki related commitments are fairly non-urgent things. The main problem is the spam I get via emails for a few other commitments which are more coding related, but they are fine. The bot, thats different. The bots are made for batch editing to save me time, keep the recent changes clean and make life easier for everyone. Wikipedia has an entire fleet of bots to do a lot of the tedious work. A lot of users and admins have had me run tasks on request, it is a tool for the wiki. --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 23:25, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Once I see him make a lot of edits daily, I will consider changing my vote. He rarely helps out on main space, and considering Bubbubbub doesn't edit on mainspace, Lcawte too shouldn't have the rights to even vote at the current time. User:Agent Swipe/sig1 Frankenmonster.png User:Agent Swipe/sig 2.0 --- The dawn is coming...
    He used to edit on the mainspace. That gives him the rights.23:30, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
    The vote was that if you currently don't edit on mainspace, you can't vote. Besides if he never edits, why should he be an admin? This shouldn't even be discussed. User:Agent Swipe/sig1 Frankenmonster.png User:Agent Swipe/sig 2.0 --- The dawn is coming...
    It says those who don't contribute. Lcawte contributes through his bot.User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:35, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
    Technically the bot is not his account though he created it. User:Agent Swipe/sig1 Frankenmonster.png User:Agent Swipe/sig 2.0 --- The dawn is coming...
    I contribute through discussions in the forums, running the bot, being an advisor to certain admins and contributions to official brickipedia elements off site. Similar to Diplomatic immunity. --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 23:56, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
  3. After considering this request for quite a while, I am opposing it. There are a few reasons for this:
    • First of all, I see absolutely no need for the tools. Lcawte is not active in terms of edits or any of various different types of community interaction. As such, I have absolutely no idea how Lcawte will handle these tools in a variety of situations - and he is not an admin on any other large, active wikis, so none of those allow me to form any kind of impression either. As such, his lack of activity clearly shows his lack of a need for these tools, and also causes some doubt as to whether or not he would make good use of them. And don't anyone go telling me that he contributes though his bot. Anyone can run a simple bot like he does, and the fact that he takes the time to press the "go" button some days does not show dedication or experience on this wiki.
    • Second of all, how on Earth does the candidate plan to spend any time here (this is a rhetorical question). When I was nominated for adminship over a year ago, I was active on about eight wikis, but I accepted the nomination only because Brickipedia was a wiki that I spent quite a bit of time on. Also, I was not nearly as active on Brickipedia as I should have been, just like I'm not now. Lcawte is involved on a variety of different projects, but Brickipedia clearly isn't a priority for him.
    • Finally, and I'll say that this is the weakest point of my argument, I am not always impressed with Lcawte's interactions with other editors on some occasion. On more than one occasion, people in #brickipedia have come to me complaining about Lcawte abusing his flags there. While this has significantly improved (in no small part because he is barely active in the channel), it is something that I have never seen contradicted (aka constant positive interactions), so I'll voice the concern anyways.
    Also, as a side note, I don't understand why the candidate feels the need to argue every oppose. This is intentionally designed as a place where the community can determine the eligibility of a candidate for adminship, not a place for that candidate to debate. I think that it is pretty well guaranteed that if someone opposes with a stupid reason, it will be argued. Oh also, I really agree with what Agent Swipe said above; "Besides if he never edits, why should he be an admin? This shouldn't even be discussed." Sorry, User:Ajraddatz/sig 03:56, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Don't see any activity. Good user; but per ajraddatz. User:Tatooine/Template:Tatooine/Sig 21:03, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Well, I was neutral, but after giving it some thought, I object.
  • First of all, he uses his bot to make edits, the bot isn't running for admin, Lcawte is.
  • Second (pretty similar to the first), I was under the impressing (which I believe is correct) that only the edits of the account that is nominated count towards the right (the bot's don't count), and he has made about 45 this year I believe.
  • Third and final, he really only uses the bot, just the bot. He displays no critical need for the tools, not that I don't trust him with them.--Berrybrick talk -- "Character Will Be Tested. . . ." 20:00, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Ajraddatz has swayed me. I won't oppose, becuase I trust him completely with the tools, but I really don't see a need for someone who's only made about 45 edits this year to have them. NovaHawk 04:19, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
    That was what I was trying to say the whole time, I'm glad that Ajraddatz made it more clear. User:Lego lord/sig.1 ---- reply back
  2. Per NHL. User:SKP4472/sig2 12:58, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
  3. I'm really not sure at the moment, so I will remain neutral. I need a little more convincing to join the support. GG 360Gamegear.jpgOne Year on Brickipedia 19:37, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Even though Lcawte has helped this wiki a lot through his bot, he technically in my opinion can't become an admin. If I remember correctly, an admin needs to have 1000 main space edits. But I would vote in support if the circumstances were different... User:Fudgepie/sig 23:49, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
    I believe he has about 2000 actually.--Berrybrick talk -- "Character Will Be Tested. . . ." 20:43, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
    He said mainspace, not total ;) User:Ajraddatz/sig 20:59, March 27, 2011 (UTC)
    Though I completely believe it should be mainspace, I can't actually see it saying mainspace on the page anywhere. I'll have a look through the forums in a few hours or so to confirm that it isn't mainspace. NovaHawk 01:41, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
  5. I'm not voting because, personally, I don't think Lcawte makes enough mainspace edits consistently. I would trust him with the rights, but I just don't think he is that consistent in editing.User:Agent Fuse/sig 07:44, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

Comments


Agent Fuse (2)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request Failed

I would like these rights for several reasons such as:

  • I sometimes find vandal pages and want to delete them, but can't since I don't have admin rights
  • I feel like I am already doing admin work.
  • I know how to help new users.

Support

  1. Good anti-vandal, could use the tools. Ajraddatz 15:08, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Agent Charge: Agents-Logo.pngDown with Vandalism 06:29, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
  3. --CligraPeace.jpg 17:41, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. We've just got two new ones, I really don't see a need for any more presently. Sorry. NovaHawk 23:09, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
  2. We have enough administrators for this year. Sorry. SWboy 14:25, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • I'm not voting because of the fact that as things stand it looks like Captain Jag is going to be successful in his request for Adminship, therefore meaning that this year we already have got three new administrators, TheGrandEditor, Captain Jag and myself and so I don't see a need for a fourth administrator this year. Sorry, I truly am. User:SKP4472/sig2 09:02, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral - Although I don't think the amount of people given admin in a given time frame matters, I am neutral --- Why So Serious? -- Kingcjc 17:30, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral Lego lord 17:54, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment - Would the candidate be interested in helping maintain our images? We could use about five more admins in that area (:P), so if Fuse would then he has my full support. Also, there is no limit to the number of admins we have, and sometimes the more the merrier - especially with Brickipedia being more active than it ever has been in past. Ajraddatz 05:19, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
I'm doing image maint. :) User:Captain Jag/sig1 18:57, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • Actually in response to the we have a lot of new admins, we have also lost one this year and two are becoming less active (myself included), so that may reassess peoples needs. --- Why So Serious? -- Kingcjc 16:35, March 6, 2011 (UTC)


Captain Jag (3)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request Successful

I feel that we need more administrators for this wiki. There have been a large number of arguments here lately, and I feel that some more administrators is needed to calm things down. I think that I would be a good candidate for adminship, for the following reasons, among others.

  • I have nominated six candidates for patroller rights, and they have all been approved. Therefore, I feel that I could discern whether someone should have patroller rights or not.
  • I have marked many pages and images for deletion, but it would have been helpful to have administrator rights so that I could delete them.
  • I am a friendly user who is able to help new users.
  • I feel as though I have been doing much of the work on an administrator, but without the tools.

User:Captain Jag/sig1 03:39, February 8, 2011 (UTC)

Support

  1. Great user. Dedicated Brickipedian. Captain Jag has the experience. Tatooine 04:04, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
  2. NovaHawk 04:55, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Lego lord 05:18, February 8, 2011 (UTC) Great user.
  4. He might apply again if I oppose :P - Seriously though, great user, would benefit from the tools. Ajraddatz 05:26, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Per everyone. Keep up the good work! User:SKP4472/sig2 08:11, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
  6. I don't think that being an admin means you are better at dealing with arguments, as it boils down to a few tools, but you work hard and deserve the tools.User:BobaFett2/sig2 14:30, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
  7. ---It's a Kind of Madness--- Kingcjc 15:58, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
    # User:Agent Swipe/sig1 Agents-Logo.png - Down with vandalism 16:19, February 8, 2011 (UTC) (Vote struck by administrator- 100 mainspace edits required to vote)
  8. SWboy 23:32, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
  9. Agent Charge: Agents-Logo.pngDown with Vandalism 01:42, February 21, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • Yes it is only tools... Lego lord 14:34, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
It's not only tools. Rollback is a simple tool for those who can make use of it. Administrative tools can devastate a wiki when used badly.User:BobaFett2/sig2 14:36, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
What I'm saying is that it should be given to only trusted users, and most of us are trusted... other than that, it is only tools... 8@Lego lord 14:39, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
It depends who you mean by most of us. Trusted as in highly trusted.User:BobaFett2/sig2 14:40, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
I have a question, if you can nominate for yourself as Jag did, does that mean you can vote for yourself? Seems fair to me. User:Agent Swipe/sig1 Agents-Logo.png - Down with vandalism 16:18, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
Because that's an unfair vote...it's what others think of you, not what you think of you that matters in this decision.User:BobaFett2/sig2 17:52, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
Sure, go ahead and support yourself. That's good. That shows that you are confident in your ability to do a good job. If you are a bad candidate, it will be you and one other person supporting, and the request will fail. If you are a good candidate, everyone will support and you will pass. Just realize that your vote won't be counted in the tally, and also that this isn't just a tally of who supports and who opposes. If 10 people support and 2 oppose, it is still at that 80%, but if the two opposers bring up a really good point then the request might be extended for another week or closed as unsuccessful. Ajraddatz 19:05, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
You may want to check the rules before you go about saying things like this all the time- Users are allowed to nominate themselves, but they are not allowed to vote for themselves. NovaHawk 21:48, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
I did say that the vote won't count, and that wasn't the point that I was trying to make. Also, why must we be so overly bureaucratic? Ajraddatz 23:17, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
"overly bureaucratic?" , thats ironic coming from you Gladiatoring 23:36, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

I think we should consider changing this rule... Lego lord 23:24, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Ehehe... sorry Ajr :) I'm not really reading straight, and it somehow looked completely different to how I last read it :S But we have ot have rules so there is no confusion don't we? Otherwise there are going to be questions like this all the time with different answers given... NovaHawk 23:33, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
I suppose, but it seems like we have a rule for absolutely everything... I think that we could use a good dose of common sense once and a while ;) Ajraddatz 23:36, February 9, 2011 (UTC)


TheGrandEditor (2)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination Successful

TheGrandEditor always responds to situations with a cool head, is active in tagging pages for deletion, and would obviously benefit from the sysop tools. So here I am, nominating him for adminship again :-) Ajraddatz 22:59, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Support

  1. Ajraddatz 22:59, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
  2. He's fantastic.User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:12, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
  3. If I were a newbie I'd think you were an Admin with the work you have been doing on this Wiki. Keep up the good work! User:SKP4472/sig2 09:57, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
  4. good editor--The caveman 03:33, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Amazing editor and seems to be calm in potentially volatile situations, so seems he'd make a great admin to me. (Note: vote only stands provided Forum:More Admins? goes through) NovaHawk 07:15, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
  6. PA ---It's a Kind of Madness--- Kingcjc 16:52, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
  7. --Cligra Cat Lover...BrikWars! 17:53, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
  8. He may slip up at times, but everyone does, can we change the two month rule already? Lego lord 18:49, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
  9. Per NHL. User:Captain Jag/sig1 01:59, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
  10. I was just thinking of nominating you. Your edits are great! You have my vote! User:Mykheh/sig 04:33, February 8, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • He said that he wanted to leave a message here, so stay tuned. He accepted the nomination on his talk page. Ajraddatz 22:59, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
Don't you have to wait two months since your last nomination?User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:12, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
Yes. Personally I'd probably vote for him this time round, but these are the rules. I don't really know if this should continue or not. NovaHawk 23:19, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
Why don't we leave this up to the community. Things have been turbulent, and he handled this far better than I had.User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:20, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • I'd personally like to vote for this individual.:P But rules...Are rules.:TTatooine 23:22, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I got my dates confused. Honestly, though, in this case, why don't we just dump the rules? Here; a compromise: If TGE gets 90% support on this, which I think he will, then he can be sysopped. Anyways, I'll be back in two days. Ajraddatz 23:33, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
Two months since you failed, or since you were nominated? User:Captain Jag/sig1 00:04, February 5, 2011 (UTC)
From the date the request closed. NovaHawk 00:23, February 5, 2011 (UTC)
2 months waiting time, Honestly are there any rules that you follow raddatz, or are they for everyone else, while you just do whatever you want ? Gladiatoring 01:06, February 5, 2011 (UTC)
I think that we need more good admins, but there is the two month limit. I'd vote for you at the two month limit, but I'm not sure just now. User:Captain Jag/sig1 02:49, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Considering I forgot about this rule, I'll delete this request and undelete it after the two week mark. But still, is the rule really there to prevent great candidates for adminship from becoming one? Ajraddatz 03:25, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
I've started a forum about this. See Forum:More Admins? User:Captain Jag/sig1 03:31, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
Well it's been 15 days now, so it's time for the verdict... User:SKP4472/sig2 07:42, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
?? Feb 4+14 = Feb 18 doesn't it? NovaHawk 10:44, February 17, 2011 (UTC)


Tatooine[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request Unsuccessful (withdrawn)

I feel that Tatooine is a better contributor than what people give him credit for and he seems pretty active, overall he is welcoming and kind, he'll listen and try to understand from other's point of view, and he knows some pretty good HTML (did you see yingle.me?), grammar is great, why shouldn't he be?

Support

  1. Lego lord 23:19, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
  2. SWboy 23:25, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
  3. --Cligra "I predicted you'd look at me like i am insane and lo, it has now come to pass!" 23:41, February 8, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Weak oppose - Concerns with lack of experience on Brickipedia. He is a great user, but I don't think that he has been around for long enough to fully understand how stuff runs here. Also, I don't see a clear need for the tools... Ajraddatz 23:39, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Per above (though just oppose, not weak oppose). NovaHawk 01:38, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Per Ajr I'm afraid ---It's a Kind of Madness--- Kingcjc 07:10, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Per Ajr, Sorry, but I just think that you lack experience here at Brickipedia, otherwise I'd support you. User:SKP4472/sig2 07:57, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Lack of experience (or as we say in the grand world of gaming, EXP or XP) as well as a lack of need. Perhaps in 2 months. 9 months is a long time, yes, but most people have either been extremely active and effective in a relatively short time or have been very committed over long periods of time.User:BobaFett2/sig2 19:58, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
  6. This is not because of lack of edits or not spending a certain amount of time here in my eyes, as long Tatooine has been here for a three months (he has) and has over 1,000 edits (he has). I have nothing to say on the amount of experience, mostly because I have little myself. No, the reason I am opposing is I simply see no need for the tools. LEGO_Lord I do agree that he is kind and very understanding (online at least), admins are often respected more, this is usually because of the power that they have. I don't really think that this is right, and as long as Tatooine remains that way that he has been, I don't see why he would be looked up to much differently. Sorry if this was longer than is should be, and I am sorry Tatooine, I would hate for you to be discouraged because of this, or any oppositions. --User:Berrybrick-" Yeah, I knew 'em. . . ." 20:07, February 10, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • Adjraddz:A lack of experience Eh.:( I've been here almost 9 months, and I have to admit I've learned a lot. If you guys feel I am not eligible for this right, I'll make sure I can prove it to you that I am in the near future.;) Tatooine 03:35, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, if you say that he has a lack of experience, what do you think he is bad at? I see nothing... PID 16:01, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
Agree. Lego lord 16:38, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
He only has 1,000some edits - even though he has been around for a while, that doesn't show that he has been very active on the wiki, and as such he might be lacking in some areas. Also, as I said, I also don't see a clear need for the tools. Ajraddatz 19:02, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
On one hand, Jag barely has over 2000 edits. However, Jag edits well and is a very dedicated. 1000 edits really isn't very much, and if you aren't active, the tools that administrators have are near useless (since more active ones will fulfill the tasks first).User:BobaFett2/sig2 19:58, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
  • Berribrick:Correction please. I've been on Brickipedia since June 06, 2010. Administrators: Please terminate this RfA; I'm not ready for the rights yet. Maybe in a few weeks to a few months I will be ready.Tatooine 20:16, February 10, 2011 (UTC)

SKP4472 (2)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request Successful

Hi, I've decided to re-request Administrator/Sysop rights for many reasons, which I shall explain throughout this speech.

I would like to be an Administrator as I'm a well trusted, friendly, mature user and I'm always willing to help out other Users. I've helped Users, create Archives for their Talk Pages, create signatures and answered questions about various things to do with Brickipedia such as templates and more. I'm active every day and make around 40-50 edits or more a day. I'm also very familiar with the Manual of Style (MoS) and Category Guidlines and always do my best to take part in disscusions on topics in the Administrative Forum. I have made 355 Edits here at Brickipedia and feel that I'm capable of all the responsibilities of an Administrator and feel that I would make good use of the tools that the rights have to offer me.

During my time here at Brickipedia I have encountered several instances whereby I could of done with Administrative tools to keep Brickipedia clean and tidy, but here is it just one of them:

A user (whos' username is inappropriate) was constantly vandalising pages such as Jango Fett in which I was reverting the vandalism just like a Rollback should, but I and the vandalist were the only User's online for an hour and a half (no I didn't exaggerate the length of time). I had to revert the users' edits constantly. I tried giving him a friendly warning but this didn't work so I gave him a warning using Warn1 and yet he still persisted to ignore me so I remained reverting his edits until after an hour he stopped at which point I remained online, watching the recent activity like a normal Patroller for half an hour until an administrator was active in which I immediately reported it to them. Whilst watching the recent activity I also filled out a Vandalism Report which was seen and taken care of by BobaFett2 who immediately blocked the user indefinitely.

I'm always up to a challenge and always aim high and strive to do my best here to help add value to Brickipedia.

Please feel free to contact Users such as Agent Fuse, LEGOCityManiac11, TheGrandEditor, TheDarkKnights, BobaFett2, Tahu97 and other Users as a reference. Thank you for your time in reading this speech. Kind Regards.
User:SKP4472/sig2 13:20, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Support

  1. I'd say you would do a good job as an admin :) ---- Kingcjc 13:32, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  2. You have almost as large of a wall of text as I did on my first RfA... at any rate, I think that you'd do a great job as an admin. And then we'd have our two new admins for the rest of the year :P User:Ajraddatz/sig 14:37, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  3. I think you would be a great admin.--LEGOCityManiac11 11:18, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
  4. The weight could always be shared with another admin to make it easier for everyone.User:BobaFett2/sig2 14:42, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
  5. I've taken a little bit to think over this one, and I support. I don't think we need another one, but he's definetely qualified. :) -Nerfblasterpro: Can you believe it's only been a year?Maverick.jpg 18:26, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
  6. per above--User:FreddyderHamster/sig 18:45, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
  7. Per Nerfblasterpro. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 20:12, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
  8. Per Ajr. User:Captain Jag/sig1 18:12, January 14, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Gladiatoring 22:54, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Sorry, another great editor, but (per the rest) I just think for now, the current admin team is coping ok without a need for more admins. NovaHawk 23:49, January 7, 2011 (UTC)


Clone Commander Fox[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request Failed

I just wanted to see what would happen even though the admins right now are great. Clone Commander FoxCommander Fox.png 21:34, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Support

  1. Weak support - You'd do a great job as an admin, but you should be more active. User:Ajraddatz/sig 21:52, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Per my other admin votes (think we have enough admins at the moment). Also, I just don't think you're active enough right now, sorry. NovaHawk 23:52, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Not active enough at the moment. Maybe later.User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:57, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Not active enough at the moment ---- Kingcjc 08:56, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • You probably would be good at it, but you need to edit a whole lot more. LEGO Lord 21:35, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • :) Thanks Clone Commander FoxCommander Fox.png 21:40, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

I can be much more active except over the summer when i go to camp Clone Commander FoxCommander Fox.png 21:56, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

  • Neutral - Currently thinking through all three proposals. Will vote tomorrow ---- Kingcjc 22:06, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral As with all admin proposals, I think we've got enough active admins at the moment. User:Samdo994/sig1 12:11, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral A bit more activity and you would have my support--User:FreddyderHamster/sig 18:37, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Captain Jag (2)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request Failed

Good User here, and has made over 2,500 edits. User:Agent Trace/sig1 21:57, December 31, 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. User:Agent Trace/sig1 21:57, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
    • I suppose him. He's been here for a while-he hasn't made many edits, but he is a good editor. He also discusses in MOS, nominates and votes for article ratings, and other things-he'd be a good candidate.User:BobaFett2/sig2 14:28, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
  2. I think Captain Jag is a really good user, it doesn't matter how mat edits you make (apart from 1000) and it doesn't matter how many Administrators there are- as long as they are good users Agent Charge: Agents-Logo.pngDown with Vandalism 18:49, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Sorry, but I think there are other users who have made more edits and would make better use of them. Once again sorry. User:SKP4472/sig2 12:27, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
  2. I believe there are users who make greater edits, but I do think he should be an administrator at some point of time. Right now I would suggest TheGrandEditor. LEGO Lord 17:47, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Gladiatoring 22:18, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Clone Commander FoxCommander Fox.png 00:31, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Sorry, I just think there are currently enough admins presently. NovaHawk 20:58, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  6. Currently not active enough to really benefit from them ---- Kingcjc 13:31, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  7. Out of all the current RfA's that are going on, I'd personally like to see this user admin the most, but I agree again with NHL.. --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 16:34, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  8. Per Lcawte--User:FreddyderHamster/sig 18:40, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
  9. Per cjc. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 20:14, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • Has the user accepted or been notified of the nomination? -----Happy New Year- Kingcjc 00:45, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, he has.User:BobaFett2/sig2 17:08, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
Oh yes, and I do have admin experience on other wikis. User:Captain Jag/sig1 17:09, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral - For now I'm neutral. May change. ---- Kingcjc 17:55, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

* Neutral - Per Kingcjc. If we had to have one more admin, I'd most likely vote for Jag. However, I still don't know if we need another. NovaHawk 21:55, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

  • Neutral - I think that one more admin couldn't hurt, but there are other users that I feel have a greater need for the tools. User:Ajraddatz/sig 00:01, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral Enough active admins at the moment. User:Samdo994/sig1 15:53, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral He'd fill the role but he's not very active at the moment.User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:04, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
Here is a list of the tools of an administrator, from Brickipedia:Administrators, and for some of them, why I think I should have those tools. I will try to do more later, but for now, I have to go.
  • No rate limits on account creation, moving pages or uploading files. - I think I already have this with patroller.
  • The ability to delete or restore a page. - I have marked (many) pages with delete or speedydelete.
  • The ability to delete, edit or toggle an article comment. - We're not using this at the moment.
  • The ability to protect a page so that only certain users can edit it, and permission to edit any protected page.
  • The ability to protect certain aspects of the wiki in the case of extreme vandalism.
  • Permission to edit the site interface, such as the sidebar and sitenotice, or the site skin. - I have worked on the skin for this wiki.
  • Block a user from editing Brickipedia.
  • The ability to move files. - I already have this with patroller.
  • View deleted pages.
  • Assign Patroller rights to users.- I have nominated four people for patroller (including myself), and they have all been approved.

User:Captain Jag/sig1 18:47, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

As long as you are more active, I would support you. You aren't here very often. I really have something against the idea that there is a limit on the number of administrators, or just the common Per NHL reason that many people give when opposing or supporting. He's great-but what bugs me is that people just side with him most of the time.User:BobaFett2/sig2 18:51, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
The reason I'm not as active is because I only have a limited time on the computer each day, and there are only limited days I can use it. User:Captain Jag/sig1 19:06, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
I used to have that problem, but my parents let me do wikia more than the normal alloted time since I was practicing grammar, typing, and other writing skills. I'm sorry if you do, but one of the main administrator requirements is activity.User:BobaFett2/sig2 21:26, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Ajr: How would giving me administrative tools hinder other people from getting them? Like you said on TGE's RfA, we can have as many admins as we want. User:Captain Jag/sig1 18:15, January 14, 2011 (UTC)

We can, but most people are a bit closed-minded about new administrators.User:BobaFett2/sig2 18:21, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
Because someone does not vote the same as you, does not indicate they are closed minded, you are so rude, and the voting process here is a joke Gladiatoring 23:53, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
Eh? I agree that it's a joke. I'm not referring to everyone, but to the people who simply follow precedent without an actual source about the oppose. That's all.User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:58, January 16, 2011 (UTC)


Agent Fuse[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request Failed

I've passed my one year brickiversary and it would be helpful.

Support

Oppose

  1. Sorry, but I don't feel you need it currently. -----Happy New Year- Kingcjc 01:23, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Per cjc. Also, can you be specific on how and why it would be helpful? User:Ajraddatz/sig 16:34, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Per Kingcjc (sorry) NovaHawk 18:48, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
  4. 1 year doesn't do it-some people take less than that, some people take more-it's really about dedication, and what you are doing-if you are fulfilling the roles of an admin (eg: finding pages that need to be deleted without a discussiong, warning and reverting vandalizm, etc), then administrative tools would be merited.User:BobaFett2/sig2 14:27, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Gladiatoring 22:19, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
  6. User isn't really active in discussions so hasn't displayed things I'd like an admin to display. --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 16:30, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  7. I think here oter users that are more qualified then you at the moment--User:FreddyderHamster/sig 18:36, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
  8. Per FDH. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 20:14, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • Neutral: I think he deserves the rights more than Captain Jag as Agent Fuse is more active and has made more edits than Captain Jag, but I still don't know if we need another admin. I mean another Admin wouldn't hurt the community but its also not required currently. User:SKP4472/sig2 14:40, January 4, 2011 (UTC)


TheGrandEditor[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request Failed

He has been making great edits, and basically already acts as if he is an administrator. LEGO Lord 18:56, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

Support

  1. LEGO Lord 18:56, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
  2. I think that he'd do a great job as an admin. User:Ajraddatz/sig 00:38, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Already does the job, just without the tools-he'd be great.User:BobaFett2/sig2 01:14, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  4. I agree with BobaFett2. (sheesh almost everything you say I agree with). TheGrandEditor has made many good persistent edits which have added value and benefited Brickipedia, therfore I think he would make good use of the rights. User:SKP4472/sig2 14:35, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Per Ajr ---- Kingcjc 13:32, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  6. He is an all-around good editor. --Cligra Cat Lover 16:36, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
  7. Agent Charge: Agents-Logo.pngDown with Vandalism 18:51, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Gladiatoring 22:17, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Per Ajr, however, I just think we still have enough admins presently. Sorry. NovaHawk 20:57, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Clone Commander FoxCommander Fox.png 21:33, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Per NHL, --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 16:32, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
    • Per NHL, Agent Charge: Agents-Logo.pngDown with Vandalism 18:56, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • Neutral - As with the other nom, may change, but currently Neutral. ---- Kingcjc 20:22, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral I would fully support him, as per above comments, but I think we've got enough active admins at the moment. User:Samdo994/sig1 15:52, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment - How could having one more admin possibly hurt the operation of this wiki? Vandals would get blocked faster, bad pages deleted faster, pages under attack protected faster, etc. We don't have a limit, you know... User:Ajraddatz/sig 21:52, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
I had a discussion about that in the IRC with BobaFett2. The point is, in my opinion the quality of a wiki is also defined by the number of administrators in relation to the number of active users (and possibly the amount of articles). I think we need some more time until another admin is elected, so new (and active and good editing users) can join. User:Samdo994/sig1 12:53, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
Please describe how the quality and number of admins to active users could possibly be related.User:BobaFett2/sig2 13:14, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
You (all) are overrating adminship, except BobaFett2. Please show me exactly where in the MediaWiki manual it states that we need to limit the number of admins we have. Quite to the contrary, and I'll say this yet again, the more the merrier, so long as they could all use the tools. User:Ajraddatz/sig 14:15, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
And CJC.User:BobaFett2/sig2 14:25, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
@ Ajr: I never said it was written down somewhere. It's just my opinion, as I previously stated. I've seen some quite good wikis and they had a certain amount of users related to admins. Don ask me how many, but there are at least the same amount of users as admins, if not more. I never said I oppose any user who wants to be an admin and don't want any more admins to be elected, I am happy to have TheGrandEditor as an admin. I just mean we have not enough active users to elect another admin at the moment. User:Samdo994/sig1 16:03, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
No, there are more many users than admins. Some users are not active, and some are only semi-active, but we get new users all the time. Also, we have 6 or 7 active administrators (NBP, LegOtaku, and Rex are inactive, as are Bahnpirat and Darth Smith).User:BobaFett2/sig2 17:39, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
Also, I asked you to explain your reasoning. As I said, it's a precedence thing. Most follow what works, without trying a new idea.User:BobaFett2/sig2 17:41, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
Yes, but I count them since they still have their admin rights, although they are inactive. I already have explained my reasoning (and anyway I didn't oppose so why am I in need to explain something?). And, as you said, we get new users at time, so there will be eventually enough users in relation to admins anyway. User:Samdo994/sig1 18:49, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
By that reasoning, shouldn't you count inactive users too?...User:BobaFett2/sig2 21:44, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
You should stop applying pressure to get people to vote the way you want them too. People should not have to reason why they vote one way or another Gladiatoring 22:46, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
We're just trying to show why we don't think the too many admins mindset is right...User:BobaFett2/sig2 22:47, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
Agent Charge, you're only allowed to vote once. User:Captain Jag/sig1 18:54, January 10, 2011 (UTC)


SKP4472[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Request Failed

I would like to be an Administrator as I'm a well trusted, friendly, mature user and I'm always willing to help out other Users. I'm active every day and make around 40-70 edits or more a day. (last week however I wasn't active because Broadband had been lost in my community area). I'm also very familiar with the Manual of Style (MoS) and Category Guidlines.I have made over 2,630 Edits here at Brickipedia and feel that I'm capable of all the responsibilities of an Administrator. Please feel free to contact Users such as Agent Fuse, LEGOCityManiac11, TheGrandEditor, TheDarkKnights, BobaFett2 and other Users as a reference. Thank you for your time. Kind Regards.

User:SKP4472/sig2 16:48, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

  1. Not need atm. ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 17:04, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Sorry, I just think we have more than enough admins at the moment. NovaHawk 22:26, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Per above. You are a great user, but we don't really need anymore administrators at the moment. User:Ajraddatz/sig 22:46, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Great job, but it will be awhile before we need another administrator! You are on your way, however!User:BobaFett2/sig2 00:02, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Gladiatoring 01:12, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Captain Jag[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination Failed

Nice job on the wiki. User:Agent Trace/sig1 07:04, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. Sure. User:Agent Trace/sig1 07:04, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Weak oppose. Sorry, but I still think you could stay as rollback for a bit. GG 360Gamegear.jpgOne Year on Brickipedia 19:36, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Overall no Clone Commander FoxCommander Fox.png 19:54, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
  3. I don't see a huge need for sysop tools, sorry. User:Ajraddatz/sig 01:26, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  • Has the user accepted the nomination? NovaHawk 07:14, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
Well... sort of. I'm not sure about doing it right now, but just later when and if article comments are permanently enabled. User:Captain Jag/sig 07:19, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • Well, for a nomination to count, the user has to actually accept it. So did you want it to run, or for the page to be deleted as an invalid nom? NovaHawk 07:32, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • Okay then... let it run, but I don't need the tools until the article comments are enabled. User:Captain Jag/sig 07:47, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral. Definitely a trusted user who wouldn't abuse these tools, but personally I'd like to see a higher mainspace editcount before supporting. Also I'd like to see how the wiki runs with current 7 active admins before supporting any more admin rights. Yes, I get that our period of very low amounts of vandalism is unfortunately now about to end, but I'd rather see if comments are going to be enabled permanently before supporting on that basis. NovaHawk 01:37, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Just a note- if article comments are not permanently enabled, I don't need the tools, and my rights could be removed. User:Captain Jag/sig 03:07, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral. A good, trusted user and would support if comments are permanent. ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 16:16, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

  1. Neutral: He's good, but he's not very active.User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:48, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

Gladiatoring[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nomination successful

A helpful user with deep knowledge of many of the less covered aspects of the wiki. Checks the recent changes often and has noticed many things that others hasn't, helping the wiki become what it is today.

Support

  1. ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 15:51, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
  2. User:Ajraddatz/sig 15:55, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
  3. --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 15:55, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Go for it.User:BobaFett2/sig2 17:42, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
  5. NovaHawk 00:02, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
  6. User:Captain Jag/sig 00:32, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
  7. GG 360Gamegear.jpg 11:47, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
  8. User:Samdo994/sig1 11:53, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
  9. User:Agent Fuse/sig 00:52, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
  10. --User:Agent Trace/sig1 00:55, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
  11. User:Cpatain Rex/sig 08:52, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
  12. Clone Commander FoxCommander Fox.png 14:45, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
  13. Agent Charge: Agents-Logo.png No Crime Stands on Brickipedia 19:24, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • Has the user accepted the nomination? NovaHawk 00:02, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • yes, and thanks to all for your supportGladiatoring 00:04, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

GameGear360[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Nominator withdrew the request, with the following reason:

"I have decided to withdraw and try again in some time later when most users are gone. I feel that I would like to become an admin and deserve it, however the jury says no. I will acknowledge that and try harder. Within the future for further references, I know admin is a tough job, however I am completely up to it. With those inactive spots, please send me a message. I will immediately come to help. Sorry, signed GG360"

The reason I have decided to nominate myself is because of the following reasons below:

  1. I am a helping, friendly, dedicated worker here.
  2. I have helped many and encouraged them to stay.
  3. I have worked here for almost a year, and grown in many skills. I can type really fast, which helps a lot.
  4. Even though I am not as active as Glad, I have reverted quite a few cases of vandalism.
  5. Out of all the wikis I have worked on, I have chosen this place to stay at. This wiki is like a second home to me.
  6. While sometimes I am slow and the main reason I don't have as much edits as others is because I take time with my articles and edit them to their fullest.
  7. I have become a friend to those who need it, and encourage others to join. I was one of the people who got Boba to join here.
  8. Last but not least, I have a good humor and am fun to work with.

Please take this into consideration, and thank you for reading this message. GG 360Gamegear.jpg 16:05, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

  1. I think that you are an amazing editor, and a great person. Sorry, I just don't see a large need for admin tools. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:08, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Per Ajr, and I've noticed the user seems to go inactive for a while fairly often.. --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 07:47, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  • I just thought for my one year anniversary I could obtain admin. Largely because of my long breaks is that I have been going through a lot of stress, and I also have a lot of others stuff and because I have been going on mini vacations every weekend.. But what I'm saying is that this wiki has benefited with me being here. I brought Boba over here. I created 200+ articles. When I'm doing my tasks, deleting an article is so much easier that letting it rot with a tag. Getting admin would mean so much to me, you wont regret it. GG 360Gamegear.jpg 11:53, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
    • The "obtain" there just threw me off supporting. Adminship isn't a trophy or reward, it is like a job. A really bad job that very few people actually enjoy doing. Trust me, you have more fun as an editor right now than you would as an admin. User:Ajraddatz/sig 14:33, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

BobaFett2[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.

BobaFett2 is one of the best contributors to Brickipedia. He is active in counter-vandalism, as well as many other areas, and I think that he would do good with these tools. User:Ajraddatz/sig 15:23, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator. User:Ajraddatz/sig 15:23, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
  2. User:Captain Jag/sig 20:35, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Agent Charge: Agents-Logo.png No Crime Stands on Brickipedia 08:39, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
  4. --User:Agent Trace/sig1 00:57, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
  5. ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 20:14, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
  6. The dark knights2.png 02:30, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Even though he has made a few mistakes (which we all do from time to time) he is still a Trustworthy Editor. SKP4472 Talk 355 Edits! Devoted Editor of Brickipedia 10:01, September 26, 2010 (UTC)`
  8. He has been very helpful with me and other new users.--LEGOCityManiac11 10:21, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
  9. i vote yes! —Unsigned comment by Tahu97 (talk • contribs). 15:28, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
  10. User:Agent Fuse/sig 04:57, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
  11. --Dragonian King Talk 16:07, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
  12. --Alexyodaross 17:42, October 2, 2010 (UTC)Alexyodaross
  13. Per the nomination. He's someone who works hard for the wiki, the fact that there are currently enough admins does not change the fact that he deserves to be given the opportunity to serve the community and the wiki as an administrator. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 18:38, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
  14. I'm Suprised He isn't One Already. :\ Template:Crt2
  15. How isn't he one already? Just look at the trophies in his page! --User:Coconutrules 02:06, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
  16. support--User:FreddyderHamster/sig 17:43, October 5, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose is mainly due to not thinking we need any more admins at the moment- Glad's been doing a great job as admin, and Glad along with the other active admins seem to be taking care of everything NovaHawk 00:31, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Per NHL.. --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 07:06, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Per NHL. No offense to you Boba, I'd say yes, but I think we have got enough at the moment. :S User:Samdo994/sig1 15:31, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Can't see the need for more Admins here yet, It's perhaps a case of to many chiefs not enough indians. Gladiatoring 00:06, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
  5. I am sorry, but I have to agree with them. :( -Mariofighter3: Open your Heart! 03:21, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral

# Look, I think BF2 is a great guy, and has made a huge number of amazing edits. But, can at times on talk pages phrase things to a user which to me would not really be desirable in an administrator (most recent example). I'm not saying that the admins here (myslef included) are perfect, but it does seem to be less frequent with the current admins to me. So, basically I'd have to support and oppose at the same time, so neutral NovaHawk 00:08, August 27, 2010 (UTC) # Per NHL, and I feel asleep before looking into some experiences in the past where BobaFett2 was admin that I want to check if they still apply.. I think it was mainly bcrat tools, but meh, I like to do research.. My vote will be mainly based on his work at Minifigure Wiki, as I believe he has displayed a wider variety of skills I would look for in an admin. --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 07:43, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

  1. Per the two above. I feel the same way. User:Cpatain Rex/sig 08:51, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

  • Has the user accepted the nomination? NovaHawk 00:08, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
Yes I have. Also, I'm confused...User:BobaFett2/sig2 00:14, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, I get what you said about the comments...I try to shorten what I say but then it seems too harsh....User:BobaFett2/sig2 01:52, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
Lcawte, Ajr already said that being administrator on brickipedia does not have to do with being administrator on other wikis...otherwise you'd be an administrator.User:BobaFett2/sig2 12:42, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
No, I said I was looking for skills, and I've had some bad experainces where you have been admin in the past, its not a requirement that you'be been admin on other wikis, but if you have, it can be a real great thing to add a big margin between loss and win :) --Lewis Cawte (Talk - Contact) 14:52, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
I tend to agree with NHL Boba's passion for LEGO can sometimes be, well lets say undiplomatic, this is a real borderline decision for me as I think Boba would make a great asset as an admin here, but I need to think about this in depth some more ... ( How long does the voting stay open ? )Gladiatoring 14:22, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
Voting stays open for two weeks NovaHawk 23:45, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
      • I've kinda re-opened his RfA at his request; please review your stance and support if possible. We could use another admin, imo. User:Ajraddatz/sig 16:29, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
        • Shouldn't this vote be completely restarted since circumstances have changed? (new admin, article comments soon to be disabled, etc) NovaHawk 00:32, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure it has beenUser:BobaFett2/sig2 01:00, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I mean all votes prior to the nomination's undeletion (September 25). I'm not saying it has to be, there just hasn't been an undeletion before so I don't really know what goes on in that case. Maybe would it be ok just to contact users who have voted before (both support and neutral), let them know that their vote is once again being counted, and if they want to change it (to support/neutral/oppose), they can? NovaHawk 01:08, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
I'm sure they haven't changed it as I haven't done anything majorly bad. But that's fine, go ahead if you want to.User:BobaFett2/sig2 01:38, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
  • If no ones got any problems, voting will be over within a week ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 20:41, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
    • Shouldn't it end at two weeks since the restart? But personally, I don't really have a problem with it, it's been fairly inactive for a while NovaHawk 23:05, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
        • It's been more than 2 weeks hasn't it?User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:08, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
          • It's been 4 days since the re-activation NovaHawk 23:11, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
            • Isn't that 7 days?User:BobaFett2/sig2 23:12, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
              • It came back September 25 (so 5 days, thought it was reactivated on the 26th) NovaHawk 23:15, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

I'm just saying, I really don't think that there are already enough admins. There are so many new users I can't even count them.User:BobaFett2/sig2 00:07, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

  • Not directly related to this request, but can people take a look at Forum:RFR/AFS votes please (particularly the RFR bit). This vote's kinda close, and I don't know about Kingcjc, but if the vote closed right now and I had to either grant rights or mark the request as unsuccessful, I wouldn't know what to do. Thanks NovaHawk 01:18, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
Kingcjc said yea (I think)User:BobaFett2/sig2 01:57, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
It depends. Im not sure what the requirements are here as to percentage or clearence etc. Do we have guidelines here ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 15:08, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure but there's a lot more yeas than nays.User:BobaFett2/sig2 19:38, October 1, 2010 (UTC)S
So this vote ends on the 9th.User:BobaFett2/sig2 02:21, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
Vote ends on the Sixth/Seventh (depends on your timezone). (And i presume going with the 80% needed criteria) ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 20:02, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
I guess but it's impossible for me to win with that.User:BobaFett2/sig2 20:06, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
Yesterday we had more than 3 new editors, and there are three more today. Are you SURE another admin isn't needed?User:BobaFett2/sig2 18:55, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

Hey, isn't there some kind of requirement, that a user who votes here needs to have a certain amount of mainspace edits/must have been here for a while? There are quite a lot (to me) unknown users voting here... User:Samdo994/sig1 11:32, October 5, 2010 (UTC)

I looked for one and didn't find it. Anyways, the aren't unknown, they're some of the new builders here...there's so many, two new ones today as well. We really need another admin.User:BobaFett2/sig2 13:07, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
I thought there was, but I couldn't find one. ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 15:45, October 5, 2010 (UTC)

Its been discussed on how we decide this, as technicly the critera of 75 or 80% was not decided at the start. So I presume we are going just by positive votes? Either way vote will be closed by this time tomorrow. ----- It's Magic - Kingcjc 19:51, October 5, 2010 (UTC)


Probably something like that.User:BobaFett2/sig2 19:48, October 5, 2010 (UTC)----

Retrieved from "https://en.brickimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brickipedia:Requests_for_Adminship/Archive1&oldid=883823"