Brickipedia:User rights/Archive

ToaMeiko - Bureaucrat/Administrator

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was passed ToaMeiko (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (150 edits, 6,056 mainspace) I haven't been extremely active in the editing aspect but do check back frequently on the community and monitor some vandalism and spam despite not being able to do much about it. I resigned my sysop and bureaucrat rights voluntarily when I went mostly inactive but since we don't have an active bureaucrat anymore I'd take up that responsibility again. I'm active in the Discord channel where most of our community lives these days so if anything is ever needed I'm readily available. --ToaMeiko (talk) 17:29, 27 May 2020 (UTC) Support --Albus Potter (talk) 17:43, 27 May 2020 (UTC) ----Jay 19:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC) --LCF (talk!) 22:28, 18 June 2020 (UTC) BrikkyyTalk 13:11, 9 August 2020 (UTC) Oppose Since we just elected a new administrator,1 and the bureaucrat role is merged with administrator here, there is no reason to give rights to a user that isn't actively contributing here. This calendar year for which we are almost halfway through, the user has four undo edits to the mainspace for off-topic/incorrect info, edits to request deletion to three redirects and speedy tagged one spam article. The Discord channel already contains a number of users who continue to hold admin rights on this site and can often be asked to appear on request. --Lewis Cawte 22:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC) How do I get into the Discord? BrikkyyTalk 13:11, 9 August 2020 (UTC) https://discord.gg/XSsHckp -Albus Potter (talk) 17:15, 19 August 2020 (UTC) Comments This has at least 80% support and been sitting for a while, pass and close? ToaMeiko (talk) 02:34, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Albus Potter - Administrator

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was passed (closed early after 5 days of unanimous support) Albus Potter (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (1,488 edits, 2,495 mainspace) This site hasn't been very active lately, so I'm not quite sure if gaining admin is even possible at the current moment. Even though this site doesn't see the same levels of activity, I want to help it not be overun with vandalism. I try to look over the recent changes here when I can, but there isn't much use in reverting edits when vandals are not banned. I have experiance as admin on various LEGO Fandom wikis and have been a rollback/patroller here since 2015. Albus Potter (talk) 16:52, 18 May 2020 (UTC) Support --Lewis Cawte (talk) 12:58, 19 May 2020 (UTC) ToaMeiko (talk) 16:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC) --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 22:06, 24 May 2020 (UTC) --LCF (talk!) 22:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC) Oppose Comments

Jack Phoenix - Administrator

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was passed (closed early after 5 days of unanimous support) Jack Phoenix (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (5,061 edits, 1,005 mainspace) For almost two years I've been a system administrator for the Brickimedia wikis (because saying "Brickipedia + GBC + Meta that really should be closed by now but isn't" sounds just awkward), but my wiki experience goes well beyond that. I made my first edit on a wiki — pretty sure it was the English Wikipedia — over a decade (!) ago and for the past eight years I've been writing MediaWiki extensions and skins, which are used on various MediaWiki wikis out there. GlobalUserPage, the extension which allows you to have a single user page on a wiki farm, was originally written by me for ShoutWiki, but it's now used on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis! On Brickimedia I've contributed to the Refreshed skin, which is our current default skin, as well as fixed various software bugs ranging from simple typos to logic errors in actual program code. But I've also written a few reviews (and hope to do more of those in the future!), participated in policy discussions and most recently written a detailed write-up about the Fabuland theme. In addition to all that, I've also moved badly named files, deleted unused low-resolution files and blocked vandals and spambots — all of which require admin tools, to which I've had access as a sysadmin. Questions, comments, concerns, anything? Feel free to ask in the comments section below! --Jack Phoenix (talk) 03:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC) Support This is self-explanatory. :P SamanthaNguyen (talk) 03:49, 27 November 2016 (UTC) Per Sam :) NovaHawk 11:06, 27 November 2016 (UTC) ^ --CPPLAYER90210 T ~ C 13:23, 27 November 2016 (UTC) Berrybrick (talk) 13:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC) BrikkyyTalk 15:56, 27 November 2016 (UTC) Vasko (talk) 17:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC) I don't think it would hurt to have you as an administrator at all. Per Sam. LCF (talk!) 18:57, 27 November 2016 (UTC) Latenightguy (talk) 19:11, 27 November 2016 (UTC) CJC95 (talk) 20:15, 27 November 2016 (UTC) ToaMeiko (talk) 04:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC) Get your cape on! Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3 Neutral Oppose Comments Jack, you don't have enough mainspace edits to run for admin. Normally, I'd remove this outright but I don't think you'll have any trouble making 30 more mainspace edits. LCF (talk!) 07:17, 27 November 2016 (UTC) Re-opened as per User talk:Jack Phoenix- also see Brickipedia:Forum for more stuff NovaHawk 11:06, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

SamanthaNguyen - Administrator

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was passed (closed early after 5 days of unanimous support) SamanthaNguyen (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (1,717 edits, 944 mainspace) My experience with wikis has been since February 19, 2012 which started out on the My LEGO Network Wiki(a), which is about 5 years (4 years and 9 months to be more exact). I've travelled across many smaller wikias during that time to learn about wiki markup, after getting interested from looking at the source code of pages. Over this time I have talked with other wiki members and started gaining insight of how a community works, and learning that collaboration is one of the most important keys. My main self-improvement started when I discovered LEGO CUUSOO Wiki (which is now LEGO Ideas Wiki) and although it is in the process of being closed and it no longer has much of a use in current times, it's helped me learn a lot, and one of the reasons how I came about here today. This was the first time where I was working on a wiki with over half a thousand articles, and have a decent amount of users to talk with and edit with. Discussions would happen, and we all learned how maintenance is truly important, along with communicating ideas (no pun intended!) of how bring a wiki a step forward. Although I have gained a lot of technical experience, I believe that I've also developed wiki experience along the way and would be able to assist as a role of an administrator and not just a system administrator at Brickipedia. SamanthaNguyen (talk) 04:25, 7 September 2016 (UTC) Support Duh. NovaHawk 04:39, 7 September 2016 (UTC) Per Nova. BrikkyyTalk 05:05, 7 September 2016 (UTC) Per the above. This is a silly technicality anyway since sysadmins have the power to delete pages, block users, etc. and I'm sure that anyone we can trust with +sysadmin, we can definitely trust with +sysop, too. --Jack Phoenix (talk) 08:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC) CJC95 (talk) 09:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC) Vasko (talk) 10:07, 7 September 2016 (UTC) cpplayer90210 10:45, 7 September 2016 (UTC) Since you're a sysadmin and you seem to have an understanding about how things work around here, sure. LCF (talk!) 20:03, 7 September 2016 (UTC) Yeah, voting is silly. Berrybrick (talk) 20:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC) Neutral Oppose Comments Done. NovaHawk 08:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Edward Nigma - Administrator

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was passed Edward_Nigma (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (3,128 edits, 3,097 mainspace) I've been contributing to this site for over four years now, making over 2,000 mainspace edits. I'm an active editor; Currently I'm a patroller (I have been since 2013), and in the past I was a QCG member as well as a chat moderator. I believe I have a good understanding of the policy and enough experience to be an administrator on this site. LCF (talk!) 20:39, 14 August 2016 (UTC) Support Sure LegoFan4000 talk 20:57, 14 August 2016 (UTC) I take credit for reminding you :P SamanthaNguyen (talk) 22:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC) I mean, I have issues with the timing, but I have no reason to believe you'd be a bad admin, so I guess I'll support. CJC95 (talk) 23:13, 16 August 2016 (UTC) Can't see a reason why not. Lots of edits, active, helpful user who probably won't go crazy with the tools. --Jack Phoenix (talk) 19:47, 20 August 2016 (UTC) Per CJC. Vasko (talk) 19:50, 20 August 2016 (UTC) I thought you had these rights already. BrikkyyTalk 04:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC) Oppose Sorry but I don't think your active enough. You don't edit a lot: http://en.brickimedia.org/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Edward_Nigma&offset=20160810225848&target=Edward+Nigma yes you have the past few weeks, but anyone can do that. Sorry again, but I think we'd be promoting you to admin for the sake of it. Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3 Comments You were banned just a couple of months ago. Berrybrick (talk) 21:03, 14 August 2016 (UTC) The block was a mistake, one I should have sorted it out immediately. However, I didn't think it'd do me any good since George was almost certain it was Knight and I messing around (he'd already voluntarily left the Skype group by then, essentially erasing the Skype room logs from his computer; without them, it would be somewhat hard to prove I didn't do anything, the way I saw it). AjraddatzFan2006, the vandal in question, was actually a sockpuppet of the user Klintrin, not myself or Knight. I simply logged into chat (on my account, Edward Nigma) to see what was going on. Klintrin was added to the Brickimedia Skype Group by another user, and then Klintrin proceeded to kick everyone out of the group except for me, Knight, himself, George, and the user that added him. When it comes down to it, Nova made it clear that not even he was sure who was vandalising and trolling, as seen on the block warning on my talk page. There wasn't anything I could do to stop Klint from coming onto Brickipedia and messing with chat/vandalise (I wasn't aware of any vandalism until the next day). Ultimately there was no basis to my block and the chatban, only assumptions. It was an honest mistake on behalf of the administrators on here. LCF (talk!) 21:41, 14 August 2016 (UTC) Okay, I guess. I know I did an investigation, but I don't remember exactly what came out of it...I should probably record these things somewhere. You'd probably be a fine sysop, but because of these circumstances I don't think I can support. So, neutral, I guess. Berrybrick (talk) 21:57, 15 August 2016 (UTC) So...why now? I have no doubt you'd be good at it, but I'm curious as to why now seemed like the best time, and why do you now use LCF again? :P CJC95 (talk) 22:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC) I chose to run now because Sam brought up that I've never run for administrator on here, despite having been on the site for 4+ years, and having successfully become a CM, patroller, etc. in the past. That and the fact that there's a notable lack of administrators on after 3:00 UTC. In regards to my signature, I've actually been using this "LCF" signature for the past three years. LCF (talk!) 22:25, 16 August 2016 (UTC) Why use LCF if you renamed to Edward Nigma though :P CJC95 (talk) 23:02, 16 August 2016 (UTC) I think the signature is very simple, so I've had no need to update it since 2013. I still go by "LCF" or "LCF119" on several other sites as well, so the name certainly hasn't gone away entirely. :P LCF (talk!) 23:11, 16 August 2016 (UTC) Done. LegoFan4000 talk 21:42, 21 August 2016 (UTC) No, this is not done. Read the rules for how long these things are meant to take. NovaHawk 21:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC) Done. NovaHawk 07:58, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

LegoFan4000 -Global Sysop

LegoFan4000 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (149 edits, 7,258 mainspace)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Failed. Doesn't belong here anyway. (Putting this here because every time I make a request on Meta, it gets ignored.) I have been here for nearly 5 months and I am an admin here and on meta and I would like to be a global sysop so that I can take care of things like spam or things that have to be applied on all wikis such as mediawiki messages. LegoFan4000 talk 20:25, 15 August 2016 (UTC) Support Oppose Maybe I am thinking about this the wrong way, but if we are closing Meta, Customs, and Ideas (they aren't even on the drop-down menu now) what's the point? I'm honestly not sure why global sysop was ever a thing, either, since it seems to bypass local elections which sounds sketchy to me. If you want to be a global sysop, ask for admin at GBC and see what happens. Berrybrick (talk) 21:08, 15 August 2016 (UTC) The problem is that there are no active people there. LegoFan4000 talk 21:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC) Is there anyway you can contact them? I'm sure Meiko can if not you. And even if they have fall off the face of the Internet, I'm still not comfortable voting to give someone adminship at a domain I'm not invested in. I don't know what they want. Berrybrick (talk) 21:46, 15 August 2016 (UTC) Opposing for the following reasons: Most of your edits are category related, which can often be removing categories simply because they don't exist. If they don't exist, they don't have to be deleted, you can just create the category. Whenever you revert an edit, there is usually no reason in the edit summary, and even if you fill it out, it can be sarcastic and not helpful. For example from a few days ago, you simply put "how about this" as an edit summary, that is no reason to undo someone else's edit. You delete many things without reason. Sometimes honestly I give up bringing this up because many times I have brought up something on your talk page and you don't respond, similar to many other people's messages when they bring up soemthing on yours. This is extremely frustrating, and it only takes a few minutes or so to at least type something or acknowledge it, yet that hasn't been done (except one time when I specifically asked and you only said "Ok" and then responded to half of my message.) As berry said, there is no point since the wikis are in the process of being closed (you know where the Phabricator task is). GBC doesn't need any administrating as they can function quite well by themselves. They are active, yet their activity is mostly outside wiki, they are still active however. We have system administrators who can revert vandalism and spam if and when needed. SamanthaNguyen (talk) 21:12, 15 August 2016 (UTC) Ok LegoFan4000 talk 21:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC) I wasn't aware global sysop was a right we used. Even if we did, its not needed anymore, with Customs/Ideas/Stories closing. Electing you this would effectively be making you an admin at GBC, and that would be it. GBC is very different from this community, and I'd feel uncomfortable electing an admin for them. CJC95 (talk) 21:52, 15 August 2016 (UTC) Per CJC, and Bricki isn't the place to put a global request. NovaHawk 23:32, 15 August 2016 (UTC) I agree with the others. Also please give a reason when you start deleting stuff... Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3 Comments

LegoFan4000 - sysop

LegoFan4000 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (149 edits, 7,258 mainspace)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful (closed early as per unanimous support rule) To help out here. Help with administrative tasks. I am frequently on the RecentChanges page, so if I see something like spam I can take care of it myself. LegoFan4000 talk 13:15, 2 June 2016 (UTC) Support Sure. Ajraddatz (talk) 22:29, 4 June 2016 (UTC) I guess. CJC95 (talk) 15:37, 5 June 2016 (UTC) Oppose Comments I know it can be nerve-racking or frustrating when nobody replies to your rights request, so I'm just saying that I have seen this. :P Berrybrick (talk) 21:52, 3 June 2016 (UTC) Can you be a bit more specific? CJC95 (talk) 19:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC) Updated. LegoFan4000 talk 19:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC) Neutral I think we're just in a spammy period and yes it would be nice to have another admin now we mightn't need another in a month. I may be bias or whatever but I like my admins to edit, not just remove categories. Are you willingly to do other adminy stuff like help run our contests or do you only want it just to remove the spam? Oh and an admin's talk page should not be a red link. :P Don't get me wrong you've done outstanding work here but I'm not sure your admin material yet. Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3 I am willing to do any admin task. LegoFan4000 talk 20:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC) neutral @Soup: Didn't know how to phrase what I was going to say, so thanks for saying what I couldn't. :P Codynguyen1116 20:38, 5 June 2016 (UTC) Neutral. The real thing holding me back from a support is that I've seen a lot of unexplained reversions of good-faith edits in the past (the most recent being less than 24 hours ago). Yes the edits might need to be reverted, but good-faith edits like this need at the very least a short explanation in the edit summary, or in some cases a message on the user's talk page. This types of reversions shouldn't happen in general, but definitely shouldn't be coming from an admin. Don't get me wrong though, you're doing great and I'm very thankful for the work you've put into this place :) NovaHawk 11:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Soupperson1 - Admin (2)

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful Soupperson1 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (14,954 edits, 8,475 mainspace) I wasn't originally going to try again but a friend (who I'm not sure wants to be mentioned) convinced me to go for it. I'm #5 on the leaderboard (higher if my old account's points were merged) and the only "Outstanding Brickipedian" not to be an admin. I edit frequently (as you can see above) and I like to see myself as chief editor on the Friends, Elves, Disney Princess and Scooby Doo articles. I've wrote more reviews then any other user since joining media. I try to contribute frequently to the forum, comment on blogs, vote on votes, read reviews and I constantly check recent changes. Thank you {{SUBST:User:Soupperson1/Sig}} (talk) 20:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC)Soupperson1 Jeepers! Support You go! I can trust you, and you are a major key for this place. Countless reviews, and all the articles you've helped! Support! - Sibo the First (talk) Soup is very active and dedicated, and I'm positive that this would extend to adminship. BrickfilmNut (talk) 22:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC) It's about time you requested this :P NovaHawk 23:19, 12 July 2015 (UTC) Berrybrick (talk) 23:54, 12 July 2015 (UTC) Per everyone :D Codyn329 (talk) 01:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC) You're pretty much the only active user without these permissions :P BrikkyyTalk 05:15, 13 July 2015 (UTC) CJC95 (talk) 11:51, 18 July 2015 (UTC) Oppose Comments

ToaMeiko - functionary

ToaMeiko (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (150 edits, 6,056 mainspace)

I am requesting functionary rights because I have been active in preventing abuse on the wiki, most notably removing spam and blocking spam bots. Right now I hold global system administrator rights across Brickimedia which has given me all the same tools and access as functionary rights would, however I'd like to have the functionary flag anyways as CheckUsering spambots is technically not in the system administrator scope or responsibilities. Being a local functionary will assure that I'm not using my system administrator rights for more than they're intended for, and will also add some additional accountability and responsibility when using those tools, as I will be a local rights holder as opposed to a global rights holder. ToaMeiko (talk) 04:52, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Support

1. Support, Meiko could probably use them correctly. Active and trusted and such. Ajraddatz (talk) 04:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

   Support, Meiko knows how to use these Rights. User:Starrocks923

   (Sorry, 50 mainspace edits are required to vote in URRs NovaHawk 13:50, 4 May 2015 (UTC))

2. Sure. -NBP3.0 (talk) 18:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
3. I thought you already had these rights :P BrikkyyTalk 21:01, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

   I do lol, just as a part of sysadmin. Trying to make this more legitimate and actually be part of the user group locally though. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:12, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

4. One of our most trusted users, so I support. Codyn329 (talk) 22:00, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
5. If he basically already has them why not make it official? Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}
6. Per above. LCF ^(talk!) 01:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
7. Per all above King Kahuka (talk) 19:07, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
8. I don't see why not. Responsible user. Support. Sibo the First (talk) 19:17, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments

• Note to current functionaries: To see my previous habits of using CheckUser tools you can see my actions in the log to assess how I intend to use these rights in the future. --ToaMeiko (talk) 12:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Latenightguy - Patroller

Latenightguy (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (4,088 edits, 2,423 mainspace)

I have requested the Patroller right, because I am a very frequent editor and I feel that I should be able to patrol my edits, allowing others to do other productive things with their time. Latenightguy (talk) 18:51, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Verdict

Done. Now I can stop patrolling you edits. You better go back and patrol everything :P --LK901 18:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Brikkyy13 - Administrator

Brikkyy13 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (4,760 edits, 2,873 mainspace)

I've been a part of the wiki for just over 2 years now, and have only recently started getting rights. I've been writing good quality news articles for us and have recently been editing articles with important information such as LEGO.com descriptions (among regular edits). I've been editing many articles to a good standard to be nominated for February's BOTM. I've also been identifying many spambots, and it would be a lot easier to be able to delete them myself than having to ask someone else to do so. I do have enough mainspace edits when combined with these edits (though I myself am not too sure how the user page count got so high :/), so I am qualified. After 2 years with the wiki I know how everything works and how we work as a community, so I do believe that I have the qualities that would make me a good administrator. I also believe that if I was granted administrator rights I'd be able to increase my abilities on the wiki with the extra tools that I would be given. Being granted administrator would only increase my ability to help and contribute to the wiki. BrikkyyTalk 04:31, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Support

1. I was surprised to see that your number of mainspace edits wasn't as high as I expected (I would have assumed around 2000 or something). That's not a problem, because as a user who contributes so constructively and regularly as you is proof that quality exists over quantity. Brikkyy is a positive member of the community who engages in all areas of the site and is attentive to current discussions and topics of interest going on in the community. Brikkyy is responsible and knowledgeable about the site and its various policies and its standards. I see him being a valuable asset to Brickipedia's team of administrators as he already shines as a valuable asset to the community as a whole. --ToaMeiko (talk) 04:38, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
2. I was surprised that you did this. Usually you can guess who will be next to post an RfA. Anyway, having talked to Brickkyy (and only just realised it has two y's) about it, I see no reason to not support. CJC95 (talk) 20:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
3. At this point, having an admin wiki will be redundant. :P Seriously, though, Brikkyy is a dedicated user, and I have viewed some situations in which he could have made good use of the rights. I don't have a concern about maturity at this point; I don't think he's had a single incident on Brickimedia. So.. yeah, can't see a reason why not to support. BrickfilmNut (talk) 04:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
4. NovaHawk 04:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
5. On the one hand, I don't think we need so many admins. On the other hand, who cares? If I really want less admins maybe I'll just remove my bit someday... I don't use it much any more. Ajraddatz (talk) 08:34, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

   • Most of the current admins aren't remotely active so if we want to remove admin rights I suggest it's there's. Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}

   • Admins are removed if they don't edit within 3 months. As happened with Czech's the other day. This was agreed at some point in the forums. CJC95 (talk) 22:58, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

6. Per Nova Berrybrick (talk) 22:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments

• * Does not meet minimum requirements (500 content namespace edits), closing NovaHawk 05:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC
  • Add his edits from Wikia to his edits here and he does meet requirements (580 content namespace edits total). His edits didn't transfer. --ToaMeiko (talk) 05:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
    • My bad :) NovaHawk 06:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
      • Should I move that part about it to the start and put it in bold so no one else makes the same mistake? BrikkyyTalk 11:55, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
        • Sorry, I've been randomly missing important sentences lately, and I wasn't even skimming this one, I was reading it properly :S NovaHawk 22:20, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
          • :D It's ok! BrikkyyTalk 22:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
• I'd personally like to see 500 main space edits, and more comments on community forums. Otherwise he's a great choice. Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}
  • As Meiko said, I actually have 580 mainspace edits. Also, I don't cover much on the forums because my opinion has already been said and is shared by someone else. BrikkyyTalk 21:20, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Community forums aren't a responsibility of an administrator. I don't comment on community forums either. He reads and comments on policy forums often enough though, which is all that matters as an administrator. --ToaMeiko (talk) 21:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  • The community forums get about 4 comments a month :P CJC95 (talk) 22:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  • What are community forums? :P --SCH 5.0 (talk) 01:11, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
  • But that's 580 between 2 years, which I personally don't think is enough for adminship. Maybe in a few months? @Meiko I know you don't/no admins comment on the community forums but you/they should/could at least try. :/ Soupperson1 ^{Friends are Forever! <3}
    • We just lowered the restriction to 500 for a reason. When I put my request for administrator up I had just barely met the requirement (at the time 1000 total edits), and not nearly all of those would have been mainspace. Lower number of edits doesn't mean less experienced or less qualified. It's up to you though. --ToaMeiko (talk) 19:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
• I'm still considering this—which may take some time—and will get back to you later. I'm already leaning towards a support, though. - Bug (talk) 01:08, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
  • ^ NovaHawk 01:23, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
• CJC, I noticed you called me "It." I like my new knick name :D BrikkyyTalk 07:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
  • The first "it" was in reference to the name "Brikkyy", and the second to the RfA. CJC95 (talk) 10:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
    • I know, but the way it was worded made it seem like "It" was my new title :P BrikkyyTalk 11:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Done. 5 days, unanimous support NovaHawk