Brickipedia:Requests for Chat Moderator/Archive

From Brickipedia, the LEGO Wiki
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

LK901

LK901 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (0 edits, 0 mainspace)

Hello there. I'm an active contributor (well, I was very active in March, recently I havan't had much time to edit here, but hopefully I'll be able to edit more now), I have 370 edits on Brickipedia (297 mainspace), and I am very often on Chat. I believe that in the extremely unlikely event that there are not atleast ten chat mods in chat, and that someone starts doing something 'wrong', that I could deal with it :P.

Support

  1. Sure Ajraddatz (talk) 23:50, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  2. ToaMeiko (talk) 23:52, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
  3. No-brainer support NovaHawk 08:35, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  4. SKP4472 (Admin) 15:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  5. Good guy; Never once had an issue. Berrybrick (talk) 15:24, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
  6. Of course! Sibo2808 (talk) 18:04, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Neutral

  • You always seem to be away when I'm on, though I haven't been on much lately. So I can't oppose.Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
  • I've rarely been on chat at the same time as you. Vasko (talk) 08:31, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments



LEGOCyborg12[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

LEGOCyborg12 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (370 edits, 125 mainspace)

Well i want to be a chat moderator cause i am a fun loving guy and i hate when someone breaks the rules.I know some of you won't support me but hey no one is qualified to be a CM right?But Hey there is still a chance for few.So i hope that you will Support me to be a CM.Thanks :). LEGOCyborg12 (talk) 13:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Support

  1. I know I'm only new to chat, but he doesn't seem like someone who'd abuse the rights, so why not? NovaHawk 13:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Neutral

I haven't seen enough of this user to make a decision on this, but I'd like to see more activity in chat and on the wiki from LEGOCyborg. --ToaMeiko (talk) 14:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  1. Cyborg is a really nice guy, so I'm sure he won't abuse them, but per Meiko. Berrybrick (talk) 16:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  2. Cyborg's certainly trustworthy, and he sounds like a guy who has the potential to be a mod someday, but the last time I saw him, he wasn't quite at that point yet. I'd have to see if he is now. BrickfilmNut (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  3. Never seen him on chat after we moved. Vasko (talk) 12:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  4. Per NovaFlare, but I also agree with Meiko. -LFY1547

Oppose

  1. Per the neutrals, but to the point of opposition. LazerzSoH (talk) 18:21, 18 February 2014 (UTC)LazerzSoH
  2. Per Legoboy, and a quick check of the chat logs showed that he's never been on chat here. ----Jay 18:51, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
    Yes he has... --ToaMeiko (talk) 18:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  3. This is a concern to me. I can't trust a user with rights if I can't trust them not to work against us (the en.brickimedia.org community) --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments


Sibo2808[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

Sibo2808 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I'm on chat almost daily (from 15:00 to 20.30), and when a spammer is on, yeah, you know: Try to say stop, and hoping for a chatmod to arrive. I've wanted to be a chatmod for a long time, but finally decided: "I think the time's now." I am trying to be a friendly user, and I believe I'm so, so it can be more fun to be on chat. I feel that I'm responsible for the rights. ~~ Sibo ~ Gigantic ~ Ship. Radiant. ~ White Star International ~ 14:45, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

PS: I really want your opinion on your vote! Thanks! ~~ Sibo ~ Gigantic ~ Ship. Radiant. ~ White Star International ~ 18:18, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Support

  1. --King Kahuka (talk) 14:47, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  2. --Amir --Mr.Awesome 14:50, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  3. --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 18:31, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  4. --Klint
  5. The user is online when few other mods often are, and is mature enough to handle the rights. BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:39, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  6. Per BFN. -LFY1547 20:46, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  7. Vasko (talk) 17:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Neutral

  • TARDIS2.png Galadhanu Talk 15:22, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  • ~ CJC 16:19, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  • I don't mean offense by this, but I generally put you into the "spammer/noob" category in my head. I forget who I'm talking to half of the time, so I might be thinking of someone else completely different, but in case I am not, Neutral. User:LazerzSoH/signature
  • I'm not really sure, I kinda have a weak oppose here for some reason, seems friendly, but isn't active very much. I also don't see any helping out in chat issues too. ---- BellahScoots.pngThe Rainbow Dasher (Talk) 20:45, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
  • Haven't seen enough from the user to make a determination. --ToaMeiko (talk) 04:59, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Per above. -czech

Oppose

Comments

  • Sibo is a really nice user and he stays on chat for a very long time, he really deserves to become Chatmod, especially how Sibo isn't rude and can handle trouble-making users. --King Kahuka (talk) 19:21, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Mr.Brix[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Mr.Brix (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I really think I should be a chat moderator and I feel that before my requests were weak and I was not mature and ready enough I just wanted a feeling of power but this time I think I could be one I am on chat all the time except for Monday and Tuesday and sometimes weekends and and I feel that my behavior has changed and I am responsible enough for Chat Mod. So what do you say? -User:Mr.Brix/Sig


Support

  1. A fine user. I don't see many problems with him. -LFY1547 21:06, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Dalekst. --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 22:40, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ^ ~~ Sibo ~ Gigantic ~ Ship. Radiant. ~ White Star International ~ 14:52, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Haven't seen the user involved in any potential chat issues, and as such cannot adequately determine whether or not you would use the rights effectively. I may change my vote if this changes. BrickfilmNut (talk) 22:51, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
  • Haven't seen much actively lately, but there's no reason why I'd oppose. I'm just not ready to support yet. --Meiko
  • Per BFN. --User:CzechMate/czech 06:26, December 28, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per Czech. User:Legoboy9373/sig 10:07, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
  • Can't see a reason to swing either way. ~ CJC 14:22, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Hardly ever on chat and when he is on chat, he only stays for a few minutes. ---- BellahScoots.pngThe Rainbow Dasher (Talk) 21:45, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
    Rude --PCAddict (talk) 04:47, December 28, 2013 (UTC)
    Striking. Under 100 mainspace edits. --Meiko
  2. While Brix is certainly a lighthearted and well-meaning user, I have concerns regarding his resolve/ability to sort out issues with users and to deal with troublemakers--harshly at times. And, yeah, per TRD. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 03:20, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Struck TRD's vote per a comment by Meiko that basically said "If you don't see the user that much, it's your own fault." --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 22:40, December 27, 2013 (UTC)

Unstruck; TRD is on quite often and would see Brix if he was on much; in this case, the reason is pretty valid. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 03:20, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

NuffSaid[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

NuffSaid (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I think I should get my moderator status back because I really have gotten to know the rules and studied how to be a successful chatmod. I am more mature than the last time. More organized, and I know my limits. With these rights I will enforce and maintain chat. I know I have conflicts with other users, so if their causing problems I can let another mod deal with it. If there are none I will do what is needed. I really feel more responsible and if you could reply honestly I'd respect that because I want to know how to improve myself and make others around me feel like I'm responsible for the rights. -User:NuffSaid/Sig

Support

  1. I really wouldn't see a problem with this, I'm willing to give him another shot at this. User:Dalekst/Sig1

Neutral

  1. I haven't been on chat lately to know whether he's been or not, so I'll just go neutral. User:Legoboy9373/sig 08:48, December 22, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. There have been innumerable nasty incidents surrounding this user, some of the more recent of which cost him his rights a few months ago. I have seen at least three or four apology blogs wherein he claimed he had changed and was turning over a new leaf, but each time after this another conflict or incident of some sort sprang up. I haven't seen a lot of him lately, it's true, but with his past marred with so many black marks and no huge improvement that I've seen (though I have seen some), it will be a very long time before I am prepared to support a Nuff nomination. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 03:16, December 22, 2013 (UTC)

  1. A few too many problems for my liking. Ajraddatz (Talk) 07:34, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I really haven't seen much improvement from you since your last big incidents in late September/early October, which had been much on the same track as the events that had your chat moderator rights removed. All I've noticed is decreased activity, more "promises", and less beneficial contribution to the Brickipedia community. You always jump back up from major issues you have saying you've matured or whatever, but in all honesty, every time you've done that, you never improved one bit. Saying something doesn't make it true. From my observation, you haven't improved at all, nor have you given yourself time to improve. I honestly don't think you understand the responsibilities that chat moderator rights carry with them, and I don't think you're capable of holding such a responsibility. Seeing as in your past several apology blogs (all of which had promised that you improved and had matured, yet you continued on the same poor course after each blog) said that you would start editing, and I still have yet to see a consistent amount of effort put into the mainspace of Brickipedia, I don't really have the ability to take your word for anything. Before I can even think about trusting you with such responsibility at Brickipedia, I'd like to see consistent, honest effort put into both the encyclopedia and the community. None of this RPG or sigfig stuff is necessary, and is more of a distraction to yourself and others than it is a benefit. Consistency is a key characteristic of a responsible individual. Seeing as you go from "mature" to having blow-ups, and you make inconsistent contributions to the wiki, I don't think you're close to being responsible enough in my eyes. Give it more time (a year or so). --Meiko
  3. Per above. --User:CzechMate/czech 09:17, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per Ajr - his was the shortest so the only one I read fully, so perhaps per Jeyo and Meiko, depending on what they wrote. ~ CJC 12:37, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
  5. I think you actually have been better since the (superlative) block ended, but it's too soon to gauge if you would be able to handle moderator again. Berrybrick 17:35, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Ehh, per Meiko... User:Dalekst/Sig1
  7. While there have been no incidents that I have seen since your last ban, there have been no "tests" for your behaviour since then either. Until you are put in one of these situations, I'll have to base my opinion on your previous behaviour, in turn requiring me to oppose. BrickfilmNut (talk) 18:53, December 23, 2013 (UTC)
  8. Per everyone. The whole sock thing wasn't charming. User:Darth henry/Sig 22:14, December 27, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was None

Br1ck animat0r

Br1ck animat0r (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I have held the position of chat mod in the past and gained support due to my mainspace edits and chatroom presence. I elected to have my rights removed when I left the wiki for temporary hiatus (for school/exams/personal affairs). While I begin my return to the wiki, I have decided to request chat mod rights to pick up where I left off. From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 10:34, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Amendment: I'd like to clarify, I did have chat Moderator rights when I left the wiki. The last time my rights were removed was in Autumn 2012 (proof in Logs), I regained moderator rights in spring 2013 until the beginning of my hiatus. --From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 18:03, November 22, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. User:Legoboy9373/sig 12:57, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    Can you provide a reason? (Preferably a valid one.) --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 07:32, November 24, 2013 (UTC)

  1. I thought we didn't require reasons for supports and neutral votes? -LFY1547 19:09, November 25, 2013 (UTC)
    I'd just like to know. On controversial noms I prefer the supporting votes have reasons, though you're right that it isn't a requirement. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 10:07, November 26, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Why not? -LFY1547 20:17, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I had a nice chat with him today, and looking at his history here, it seems worthwhile. --The Evil Ogel (talk) 00:15, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Yeah, just don't vandalize anywhere anymore. >_> MsD(talk) 00:17, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Yes! --- CM4S (talk) 00:25, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Yes. I don't remember a time when Br1ck did not deserve it. --Knight
  6. Yes, per Knight. User:LazerzSoH/signature

Neutral

  1. Haven't seen much of Br1ck lately, leave it some time, and slightly per Jeyo. --User:CzechMate/czech 09:28, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
  2. This user behaves well in chat, but the fact that he didn't seem to disclose the real reasons for the removal of his rights is a little upsetting. Perhaps I'll change my vote when I receive more information, but for now, I'm neutral. BrickfilmNut (talk) 21:17, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Czech. User:1999bug/sig1 22:22, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Only because I haven't seen him in a long while, that I don't know if he's any different. User:Irnakk/sig3

Oppose

  1. I thought there was some spamming/trolling incident that lead to rights removal; certainly I got the impression that they were removed for a different reason than your request. And (though I haven't been on chat much, it's true) I haven't seen much of you lately. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:25, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per above Berrybrick 20:59, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Leaves for months after losing moderator rights, and requests for them saying you did nothing wrong. Just asked for removal. Seems legit. TARDIS2.png Galadhanu Talk 22:03, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    WP:AGF - since you weren't around back then, you aren't in a position to make such assumptions. --George (ToaMeiko) (talk) 22:07, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    Just listening to what you guys are saying and going by the log. TARDIS2.png Galadhanu Talk 01:13, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    And that was a year ago. I think a person can change in a year -LFY1547 01:42, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    But we haven't seen enough to know that he has. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:22, November 21, 2013 (UTC)

  1. I've seen him on chat enough lately to know he has; you're not on around that time, though. -LFY1547 23:28, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
    I've seen him too. Once, maybe twice. Hardly enough to know if he has changed or if he was just on his best behavior, like he usually was back then. Aside from that, lying in his nomination is not acceptable. Berrybrick 00:07, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I think this request was made too early after returning. I'd certainly consider supporting you in a month or so, but I don't think it'd be appropriate for you to be promoted only days after returning to the wiki. Drewlzoo
  3. Per everyone above. Klagoer (talk)

Comments

  • If you asked for them to be removed voluntarily, then you don't really need to do this, you could just have them back. ~ CJC 10:38, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    • Although the logs suggest something happened which led to the removal. 
      16:41, 2012 August 23 Clone gunner commander jedi (Talk | contribs | block) changed group membership for User:Br1ck animat0r from chat moderator to Users (Per Admin Wiki, sorry Br1ck)
      . ~ CJC 11:30, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  • Please note whoever closes this the lack of reasoning on the support side (I'm neutral in this entirely, just noting this) --User:CzechMate/czech 09:02, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
    • You mean "why not?" doesn't exempt you from putting any reasons? :P ~ CJC 11:37, November 26, 2013 (UTC)

The Evil Ogel[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was None

The Evil Ogel (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I am requesting chat moderator rights because I have become dedicated to the community and feel like it would be beneficial for the community for me to donate my time and efforts in making chat a better place, enforcing the chat policies, and engaging further with the community. I understand that I'm barely over the minimum requirements, but I've watched this wiki for several months, and I only joined when I realised that anonymous contributing had been turned off. I then realised that a live chat was available to registered users, which I immediately joined, and have been active in every day since I joined. Since I had been on this wiki as an anonymous user for several months, I have a good understanding of the members of the community and the policies this wiki has set. I also think that if I were to be a chat moderator, it would add a nice diversity to the team of moderators, as I have been told that I would be the only AFOL on the chat moderator team (this is of course not counting the administrator team, though I have had some great conversations with them). Anyways, I figured I'd put up this request for the reasons I just listed. I hope that the community accepts and approves of this request, as I feel like my time and efforts being volunteered would positively impact the community. Cheers! The Evil Ogel (talk) 02:24, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Mature, I see no reason not to. - BF2 Talk 02:24, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Super mature, great guy, good contributor, and will use these rights well. --User:CzechMate/czech 02:26, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  3. With a two thumbs up, YES. This user is responsible, mature and I feel like he will contribute so positively with rights. I see this user doing many great things for the wiki and the community. Brick-on The Evil Ogel! -Nuff
  4. I think you're a good user who is always on his best behavior. You are also sophisticated enough to be a mod, so I think you should be. Blob bless you! --Knight
    I'm starting to appreciate this user. Not everyone knows this much and more people should. TARDIS2.png Galadhanu Talk 02:59, November 19, 2013 (UTC) (Moved back to oppose)
  5. Ogel is a great responsible and mature new user. BrickfilmNut (talk) 04:12, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Sure Ajraddatz (Talk) 04:56, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Hell yes. :D -LFY1547 20:14, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  8. I have seen nothing but awesome things from this guy. Definite support. Though I do have one concern... (comments) --- CM4S (talk) 00:31, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
  9. Been keeping an eye on this user and can say with certainty that they are a great asset to this community, and would benefit many people by having chat moderator rights. --George (ToaMeiko) (talk) 20:43, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

#You're a good person, as I've heard, but I haven't seen much of you, which means I don't know what to think of you. --Knight

  1. Just wanted to say that I've seen this and probably won't vote. I think that's all I can say. Berrybrick 02:49, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. He seems nice and all, but he's an evil supervillain, so I'm not ready to give him the rights. Just kidding, but I still think he should have a bit more time to get comfortable with how things are done here. --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 02:55, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ~ CJC 10:38, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Never seen the user on chat. User:Legoboy9373/sig 12:56, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    I've been in chat every day for the past 10 days. Stop by some time. ;-) --The Evil Ogel (talk) 19:47, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    Or, you know, just timezones... ~ CJC 23:49, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Haven't seen enough to tell for sure; definitely leaning towards support, though. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:30, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Meiko, stop harassing me. I opposed for a reason, and know that Ogel is you, and would much rather not have 2 accounts harassing me. TARDIS2.png Galadhanu Talk 00:05, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
    First, where's your proof? Second, stop being overdramatic; your oppose was struck, just deal with it. Oh, and where was he harassing you? -LFY1547 00:06, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
    Considering my reply to you above, LFY, I have to say this...I agree with Galad. :/ Berrybrick 00:09, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
    (Not so much with the harassment part though.) Berrybrick 00:10, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
    Fair enough. -LFY1547 00:15, November 22, 2013 (UTC)

  • Sorry, but you just joined and look how educated you are in the chat. I find it a wee bit odd. TARDIS2.png Galadhanu Talk 02:28, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    But is that a problem? If I'm knowledgeable about chat, isn't that a good thing? --The Evil Ogel (talk) 02:29, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    But you know so much in so little time. It's a bit suspicious. TARDIS2.png Galadhanu Talk 02:33, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    Being "suspicious" of a user isn't really a reason to oppose them, and how could it really 'hurt to give him a small little tool that allows you to "kick" and "ban"? --User:CzechMate/czech 02:35, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    Like I said, I used this wiki before I registered for an account. I had just preferred to contribute anonymously. :-) --The Evil Ogel (talk) 02:36, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
    If he is an AFOL which means adult, you'd expect him to read the rules and understand how to follow them, assume good faith and if they aren't fit for the job it's alright. Nuff
    Well, I have three things: Czech, the reason Jeyo opposed is mainly gut. Is it wrong for him to oppose, considering I told him that some of his reasons aren't quite "valid"? Nope. I said they aren't "valid" as I can easily dispute it. I have no problem with the opposition though. Two: Ogel, this has nothing to do with contributing. And even if that were the case, you probably would've made an account sooner. Three: Nuff. Yes, I know what AFoL means. He is a bit too educated in my opinion. Most adults would read through and understand and not get that into it.

It just seems odd to me. TARDIS2.png Galadhanu Talk 02:45, November 19, 2013 (UTC) #I really don't see any reason to support. I'm not seeing any difference from him and any other user. Edit: I can't see them using this user actually using these rights either. ---- BellahScoots.pngThe Rainbow Dasher (Talk) 20:06, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

  • Really? No difference from him and any other new user? You must not be paying a lot of attention to him... --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:30, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

  • I'm debating striking this. If you see no reason to support, and you don't list a valid reason why this user shouldn't have these rights, your vote is invalid and should be at most a Neutral vote. --George (ToaMeiko) (talk) 20:45, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    She sees Ogel as just another user who wants to be chat mod and isn't good enough. Just because you don't agree doesn't mean you should strike it. —Unsigned comment by Galadhanu (talk • contribs).
  1. My reasons cannot be posted here at the moment I think. If you beg of me so, I may. ~ CJC 00:14, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ^ Berrybrick 19:51, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
  3. This user isn't any different, I also have a suspiscion this user is Meiko since Ogel hasn't been active since Meiko made George Barnick. ---- BellahScoots.pngThe Rainbow Dasher (Talk) 17:32, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
    Ogel has been active today in chat. You've obviously missed him. Additionally, if it were me, what's the problem with that? It's not like you're suspecting it being a duplicate account of a user who doesn't already have such rights and is using an account to illegitimately earn the rights. --George (ToaMeiko) (talk) 02:00, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
    If it were you, I'd suggest firstly that you didn't vote for yourself... ~ CJC 11:36, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per everyone above. Klagoer (talk)

Comments

  • Ok, I supported, though I have one problem. It's not about Ogel, it's the fact that people think I'M Ogel. I don't know where it all started, but I know Nuff and Knight are involved. I just wanna stop that rumor, I'm not him. So.. yeah. --- CM4S (talk) 00:33, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    • That's odd. Tell me about Knight and Nuff and how you know they're "involved". --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:30, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

      • I know CM4S isn't Ogel. Berrybrick 03:17, November 23, 2013 (UTC)

Brandon1991 (2)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Brandon1991 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I would love to be chat mod. I'm responsible and mature and I am strict with bullies. so, it would be a great benefit to the wiki fi you made me chat mod Brandon1991 (talk) 03:06, November 23, 2013 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. Same reason as last time. BrickfilmNut (talk) 03:17, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ^. I am also not impressed with his behaviour at LEGO Uncyclopedia. -LFY1547 03:18, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Um, I disagree with the OP. I don't believe he meets the requirements, either. Berrybrick 03:20, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per BFN, LFY, and Berry. LCF (talk!) 03:29, November 23, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • Oh, that's a link if you couldn't tell. :P Berrybrick 17:33, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
    • I didn't see the link, but I saw that last night; that strengthens my oppose. -LFY1547 17:35, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
  • Brandon got globally blocked, does that automatically void this because he couldn't use the rights? -LFY1547 19:11, November 25, 2013 (UTC)

Edward Nigma (2)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

Edward Nigma (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (3,128 edits, 3,097 mainspace)

Edward is a mature and active chatter, far more active than he was when his first nomination took place. He's often on in times when most/all mods are away, and he would do well with these rights. He knows the policies well, and he's definitely not the kind of person who is going to abuse these rights. (Old RfCM) -LFY1547 23:32, November 16, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator. -LFY1547 23:32, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I thought he already had chat mod. Per LFY's nomination reason. :S --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 08:41, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

  1. He's been great in chat every day that I've been there. He knows the place well, and understands the chat policies like a moderator should. --The Evil Ogel (talk) 17:30, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Ogel Galadhanu (talk) 17:59, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Jeyo Berrybrick 19:33, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Sounds good Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:38, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per Ajraddatz - BF2 Talk 02:38, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Per Ajr. BrickfilmNut (talk) 04:13, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  7. OK ~ CJC 10:38, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  8. User:Legoboy9373/sig 12:54, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  9. Yes MsD(talk) 00:16, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

*I don't recall seeing him on chat lately. User:Legoboy9373/sig 13:43, November 17, 2013 (UTC) (Switched to Support)

  • He's usually on a while after you leave. :P -LFY1547 20:22, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

  • User accepted via PM. -LFY1547 23:32, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
  • Request for Closure I think there's a clear enough consensus. -LFY1547 16:15, November 23, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Dragonknight86

Dragonknight86 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

Dragonknight is on chat nearly every day, and he's a mature chatter. I think him having these rights would benefit the community. When he's on chat, he's actually on chat, he's rarely ever away. He's been here for a few months now, and I think he could use these rights. -LFY1547 20:17, November 11, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator. -LFY1547 20:17, November 11, 2013 (UTC) (Moved to neutral)

Neutral

  • Never seen the user on chat. User:Legoboy9373/sig 15:20, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  • A fine user, but I have not seen enough of him recently to support. BrickfilmNut (talk) 21:35, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  • I need to think about this one. I've only seen him on chat recently, and he suggested that he was getting high, so, probably leaning towards oppose. Berrybrick 21:36, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per BFN. -LFY1547 19:10, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
  • I haven't really seen this user, and I've been in chat every day since I joined... --The Evil Ogel (talk) 17:30, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. The last time I saw you on chat, you tend to fought with users. You were also one of the people that celebrated for continuous days after I was banned... does not come off as a likeable person. --- CM4S (talk) 21:37, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  2. activity is an issue. And hasn't really helped handle situations ---- BellahScoots.pngThe Rainbow Dasher (Talk) 20:23, November 13, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per CM4Sci;TRD Galadhanu (talk) 15:30, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
  4. I can recall a lot of Amir Kinard-ish behavior in the past, and haven't seen enough of him in the present. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 08:41, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Yeah, we don't need a chat mod who is going to be getting high and then going on chat. Also, he has been a bad influence on some users in the past (see Jeyo's opposition). Berrybrick 01:18, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. See above. ~ CJC 01:21, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  3. - BF2 Talk 02:36, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • User accepted via PM on chat. -LFY1547 20:17, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Galadhanu

Galadhanu (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (22 edits, 8 mainspace)

I am active on chat, and do try to help out chat as much as I can. I am responsible, and am currently on a break from my fanfiction. These rights would be useful, as lots of spammers and trolls come onto chat when there are no mods, and as I am there when nobody else is, it would be useful. Galadhanu (talk) 15:40, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Activity may be a bit of a problem, but other than that, I don't see why not. He hasn't caused problems in a while, I don't see any harm coming from this. -LFY1547 19:07, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per LFY. -User:Mr.Brix/Sig
  3. Galadhanu hasn't been bad at all lately and has been a good user. Blob bless you all! --Knight
  4. Per LFY Misslilytoon (talk) 00:34, November 18, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Haven't seen you on enough to decide. User:Legoboy9373/sig 17:22, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
    I am on chat for hours on end. You aren't on an entire lot. TARDIS2.png Galadhanu Talk 23:15, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per Legoboy ---- BellahScoots.pngThe Rainbow Dasher (Talk) 18:31, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
    See above. TARDIS2.png Galadhanu Talk 23:15, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
  • Not quite ready to support. You've been doing very well recently, but there are a few things from a long time ago on the LMBW I saw that make me want to wait a while. BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:26, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
    I don't really see how that would have an affect on how he acts here today. :s -LFY1547 20:38, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
    It's because I want to make sure that the incidents in the past truly will never happen again. BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:42, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
    Ah, I see -LFY1547 20:43, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
    #AssumeGoodFaith. :P (Kidding). Galadhanu (talk) 06:05, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • He has a history of trolling, but he's calmed down quite a bit, so if he gets CM, I won't mind at all. LCF (talk!) 01:37, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  • ~ CJC 10:38, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  • -LFY1547 23:34, November 21, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. To be honest, I really don't trust Galad. He has a history of trolling and spamming on this wiki, LMBW, Community Central and who knows how many more. While many of the issues I just brought up were not very recent, gut feeling still rules this vote: I suspect he's just put on a more social veneer. I also don't want a moderator who orders you to get out if you say you don't know of or don't like Doctor Who. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 08:41, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

  1. I haven't spammed on any wiki. :P I think it's right to go with your gut feeling, but don't say anything untrue. Galadhanu (talk) 17:06, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
    Actually, I don't think Galad ever trolled LMBW that badly, they just thought it was bad. :P -LFY1547 17:08, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
    I haven't really trolled LMBW. Or Community Central. It wasn't really trolling. I only trolled this wiki when I came here the first time, the second time, I apologized. And look at LFY! He wasn't always the best. He's a moderator now, isn't he? I honestly could just spam now, without moderator rights, but I won't because I don't do that. Galadhanu (talk) 17:23, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
    LFY seems to think you were trolling on LMBW (even if it wasn't that bad) and I was there while you were trolling Community Central. And I don't think you only did it once here. Then, yes, you apologized...and later posted a "falling" blog dissing everyone on Bricki and ordering us all to stop spamming blogs and being ridiculous on chat.</irony> --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:33, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

  1. LFY was with LMBW when I "trolled" them. Community Central technically wasn't trolling, and I only trolled once here. I was trying to get people back to their senses with the irrelevant blog. With those people saying "ermergerd der werker ers ferllerng", it was in no way irony. Galadhanu (talk)
    He may have been trolling, yeah. However, his trolling was very minor and I'm sure most LMBW users don't even remember it. -LFY1547 20:22, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
    I don't order them to get out. I used to jokingly do so, which should've been obvious. I give them a link to every episode if they wish to see it. :P TARDIS2.png Galadhanu Talk 06:00, November 18, 2013 (UTC)
    To quote the great CzechMate, 'Being "suspicious" of a user isn't really a reason to oppose them, and how could it really 'hurt to give him a small little tool that allows you to "kick" and "ban"?' (Of course he's talking about Ogel, but this still applies. :P TARDIS2.png Galadhanu Talk 23:12, November 21, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Jeyo. --User:CzechMate/czech 02:29, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Is this a joke? MsD(talk) 00:15, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    No, but I am assuming you are only doing this because I opposed your RfCM. TARDIS2.png Galadhanu Talk 05:32, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    Lol. ~ CJC 09:39, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
    Is that even allowed? TARDIS2.png Galadhanu Talk 23:12, November 21, 2013 (UTC)

Comments


The Rainbow Dasher (5)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was done

The Rainbow Dasher (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (18 edits, 361 mainspace)

(These don't really affect anything, do they) Anyway, I'm a responsible, mature user and I usally get insulting PMs towards me and it would be helpful to have these rights. Rainbow Girl Talk 10:41, November 3, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. yes siree bob on a corn cob MsD(talk) 21:06, November 3, 2013 (UTC) wait this is a valid support reason right
  2. Dasher is nice to people, active in chat and i think the responsability shouldnt be a problem for someone like she. User:Korppufin 18:38 Finnish time.
  3. BrickfilmNut (talk) 17:32, November 4, 2013 (UTC)
  4. After observing chat, sure. -LFY1547 (Back to neutral.)
  5. Yeah, sure. Mature enough, and friendly. --User:CzechMate/czech 21:30, November 4, 2013 (UTC)
  6. - BF2 Talk 21:30, November 4, 2013 (UTC)
  7. A very active user on chat, nice and comes almost every time you say her name! Support! User:Sibo2808/Sig
  8. I don't see why not. User:Legoboy9373/sig 17:42, November 5, 2013 (UTC)
  9. Berrybrick 19:49, November 5, 2013 (UTC)
  10. -User:Mr.Brix/Sig
  11. We need more girl staff :P Every Smurfette needs her Sassette Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
    Irrelevant, I'm afraid. One shouldn't vote someone in because they're a girl; one should judge them just like everyone else. It just so happens that there are more boys on this site than girls, but that's no reason to vote for the girls only for that reason. :P --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 02:30, November 10, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Per Jeyo, but I'll just go neutral. -LFY1547 02:37, November 10, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Weak oppose. Still a little wary of this user, given past events and behavior. It's true that I haven't been very active (on chat or the wiki) lately, but I haven't seen enough to convince me she's done much else than put on a more social veneer. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 02:28, November 10, 2013 (UTC)

Comments


King Kahuka[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was SNOW closed

King Kahuka (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (543 edits, 164 mainspace)

I may have bad anger issues, but i'm actually not that much of a bad person, i'm always against swearing, cursing, and cussing, and i also will read the rules alot more often so i don't forget anymore, i am strict about cursing, so its a good idea if i get these rights. King Kahuka (talk) 21:28, November 12, 2013 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  • I am uuetral with Kahuka's idea. I like him and all , but I just don't know about him. Brandon1991 (talk) 21:32, November 12, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Poorly handles instances of conflict and has recently been banned. Self-mentioned anger issues are also a problem. BrickfilmNut (talk) 21:33, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Absolutely not. Your attitude on the blogs is just horrid, you get easily mad and then you assume we hate you for not replying to your blogs? You also tend to type in caps a lot, and I really don't think someone with those characteristics can keep calm and have the power. --- CM4S (talk) 21:35, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per BFN and Sci. Berrybrick 21:36, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Immature, bad attitude, and really just per Sci, and BFN. --User:CzechMate/czech 21:38, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per BFN and Sci. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:46, November 12, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per all above, basically. I've had to kick you several times over the past week for caps, and even ban you at one point. If you straighten up and wait a few months, maybe. But definitely not now. EDIT: Oh, and he also doesn't meet the "100 mainspace edits" requirement, either, but I can't remember if we count customs as mainspace. -LFY1547 23:10, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Nope, per above. Starts conflicts, and shouts at people when they tell him to stop. ---- BellahScoots.pngThe Rainbow Dasher (Talk) 20:26, November 13, 2013 (UTC)
  3. No basically per Sci, you overreact a lot on chat as well as acting terribly on chat. -User:Mr.Brix/Sig
  4. No. Has been banned so many times and when a situation comes, he argues. Galadhanu (talk) 05:14, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Definitely not. User:Legoboy9373/sig 11:21, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • Oh, I need to point this out: Swearing, cussing, and cursing are the exact same thing... --User:CzechMate/czech 21:39, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
  • i know.
  • by the way i'm just a kid, so don't get all mad at me for all these issues. —Unsigned comment by King Kahuka (talk • contribs).
    • Unfortunately, that's irrelevant. What matters is behavior, not behavior in relation to age. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 23:09, November 12, 2013 (UTC)

  • Although I don't meet the requirements yet to vote, I just wanted to leave this log from when I came into chat here late this evening. It would be my opposition reason, if I could vote.
King Kahuka
does LFY being away mean we can do whatever we want?
10:57
AnthonyGuy
Don't say his name, it summons him  :P
and yes
10:57
King Kahuka
then why aren't we screaming caps and breaking rules willy nilly.

--- a little while later ---

Galadhanu
Kahuka, stop
11:10
King Kahuka
telling me to stop just makes me angry, you have seen what happens with TRD.
11:10
Galadhanu
Not really.  :)
11:10
AnthonyGuy
It goes in the toilet
 :P
11:10
Galadhanu
Are you talking about my phone?
 >:(
 :P
11:10
AnthonyGuy
no, TRD
11:10
Galadhanu
Oh...
That was mean.
11:11
AnthonyGuy
no sense of humor you have
11:11
Galadhanu
But seriously, I said it a bit before you, Kahuka. No need for an argument.  ;)
11:11
King Kahuka
GYAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!
- example of my anger
11:12
AnthonyGuy
Ogel! say something, son!!!
11:12
Galadhanu
LFY. Ping
11:12
AnthonyGuy
 (stop)
11:13
King Kahuka
Anthony  (stop) doing  (stop)
11:13
AnthonyGuy
y
11:13
King Kahuka
and galadhanu  (stop)
11:13
AnthonyGuy
 (stop) ! ! !
11:14
King Kahuka
 (stop) !
11:14
AnthonyGuy
I win
11:14
King Kahuka
 (stop) !!!!
11:14
Galadhanu
Stop spamming emotes please.
11:14
AnthonyGuy
OK mom
11:14
King Kahuka
lets do the lottery
11:14
Galadhanu
I'm not your mother, not trying to be, and am not doing anything against either of you. I am not taking part in this nonsense
11:15
The Evil Ogel
Would you two stop spamming?
11:15
King Kahuka
evil ogel i'm not spamming
11:15
Galadhanu
Per Ogel
Kahuka, you are spamming
11:15
King Kahuka
and "lets do the lottery" is a jok
joke*
11:15
AnthonyGuy
spam?
11:16
King Kahuka
so how is a joke spamming.
11:16
Galadhanu
Considering you're running for mod, it's not good to start spamming or telling people to break rules
The "joke" was not spamming.
11:16
King Kahuka
i'm not
11:16
AnthonyGuy
what is spam???
11:16
King Kahuka
and never am
11:16
The Evil Ogel
You used the same emoticon five times, as well as being hypocritical telling other people to stop using the emoticon that you keep spamming.
11:16
Galadhanu
The stop signs were
Per Ogel
11:16
King Kahuka
anthony was doing it too
and you werent calling on him.
11:16
AnthonyGuy
What is Spam????
11:16
King Kahuka
you were encouriging him.
11:17
Galadhanu
 :|
11:17
The Evil Ogel
I said "both of you stop spamming"
11:17
Galadhanu
^
11:17
AnthonyGuy
I don't know what Spam is ! ! ! ! !
11:17
The Evil Ogel
Pointing fingers saying "he did it too" is stupid, and is pointless.
11:17
Galadhanu
Yep
11:17
King Kahuka
and when you told me to stop i stopped spamming already.
11:17
Galadhanu
Nope.
11:17
The Evil Ogel
But you argued instead.
11:17
King Kahuka
UGH
~ King Kahuka has left the chat. ~
This isn't an action a moderator should make, so this particular user is not ready for such a responsibility. A good user in chat would enforce the rules, whether they are a moderator or not, and whether the only online moderator is AFK or not. This user hasn't shown any knowledge of what a moderator's responsibilities are, so if I could, this would be a definite oppose from me. --The Evil Ogel (talk) 04:05, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
^This. Galadhanu (talk) 04:14, November 15, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

The Rainbow Dasher (4)

The Rainbow Dasher (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (18 edits, 361 mainspace)

Right, I've matured up. Anyway, I'm on chat everyday. I take grammar seriously and I can see when someone is breaking a rule or not. Anyway, voice your opionion. EDIT: No, I'm not planning to go rogue anytime soon, or infact ever. :P --Rainbow Girl Talk 19:41, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

Support

#Mature and responsible user. Would do great with CM powers. FellowshipOfTheBling (talk) 19:44, September 25, 2013 (UTC) (Switching to neutral.)

  1. Absolutely. A dedicated, respectful, and worthy user. MsD(talk) 20:37, September 25, 2013 (UTC)
    Per the last time I supported (I think I supported last time, at least...). BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:50, September 25, 2013 (UTC) Changed my mind after a couple of events.
  2. Friendly user! almost always on chat! ~~ Majestic - The Magic-Stick ~ White Star Line ~ 15:15, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Hes really active, friendly and always comes when im bored or alone (magic), and i have no reason to be neutral or oppose. user:Korppufin 18:21 Finnish time, 26th of September 2013.. something.
    TRD is a she. User:LazerzSoH/signature

#The user could use the rights. User:LazerzSoH/signature

Neutral

  • Not sure if I'm ready to support yet, but I have noticed that you've become more mature and can use the rights. Berrybrick 20:38, September 25, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per Berry. User:Legoboy9373/sig 16:21, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per Berry. You've definitely matured, but I don't think you're ready yet. --User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig 21:38, September 27, 2013 (UTC)
  • Personally, I don't think that long messages like that are spam, just mildly annoying. That said, per Jeyo. - BF2 Talk 12:58, October 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per Jeyo, somewhat, but I haven't seen enough of those things to oppose. However, I also haven't seen enough good out of her lately to support, either. --LFY talk contribs 15:28, October 5, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I completely missed this...but no. Strong oppose. This user has recently been known to spam excessive letters while telling off others for spam, claim certain phrases/greeting annoy her and try to get them banned, harass other users, minimod in not the best of ways and just be generally bothersome. I often judge future moderators by how I would feel leaving chat with them on, and in this case I do not feel chat would be in good hands. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:30, September 27, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Sorry RTD, but Per Jeyo. User:LazerzSoH/signature
  2. Per to the J to the E-Y-O. --- CM4S (talk) 21:52, September 27, 2013 (UTC)
  3. You're certainly coming close, but there were a few events today where you didn't quite have a handle on the policy and were annoying some other users. Again, keep up the good work; you're certainly coming closer. You're just not there quite yet. BrickfilmNut (talk) 21:54, September 27, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 10:04, September 28, 2013 (UTC)

      • She did apologize. I don't remember exactly, but I think she said something along the lines of, "I'm sorry, OK? Lot's of users were breaking the rules earlier so I'm just grumpy right now." User:LazerzSoH/signature
        • Ah, must of missed that. But even so, that excuse doesn't inspire a whole lot of confidence. :P --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 20:35, September 28, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Mr.Brix

Mr.Brix (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I believe I have matured since my last nominee. I also have been working on my grammar mistakes since the last time (I don't like to spell right when I am on chat :P.) So I thought why not.-User:Mr.Brix/Sig

Support

Neutral

  • Haven't seen you in action in any conflict-resolution yet, so I have nothing to judge based on there, and I haven't seen you enough in chat yet either. BrickfilmNut (talk) 02:50, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
  • ~ CJC 11:32, September 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • User:Legoboy9373/sig 16:54, September 26, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Weakish Oppose. This is going to be Per my last oppose on your last application, and I only see you on chat for about an hour or two. I don't really see you helping mods either. "Not ready- though I respect your feelings that you want to be a chat mod, you seem like a fit person for the job but that's not the reason I'm opposing. Being a chat mod is about being there anytime you can. We barely see you on chat unless you want to bring something towards our attention. So I believe that if you are on chat more over the course of the next few days and promise to dedicate some time everyday to patrol chat. I might change my opinion. Thinking with Bricks! 16:27, August 10, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid" So, Per this really ^ User:NuffSaid/Sig
    Per Nuff. However this isn't a weak oppose. --Rainbow Dasher! I'm a banana! 18:51, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
  2. You really haven't changed at all. You still are immature at a lot of times are are not capable of handling this at all. --- CM4S (talk) 19:26, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
  3. "So I thought why not." This makes me feel like you just want to be a chat moderator to be a chat moderator. Per others too. User:LazerzSoH/signature
  4. I don't think you're fit for this position, at least not yet. You're not really mature on the wiki and chat. You once attempted to provoke MsD by saying you're "more mature than him", which ironically, is quite immature. You haven't really acted mature any other times I've seen you, either. FellowshipOfTheBling (talk) 20:15, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
  1. Per all above. --User:CzechMate/czech 01:10, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Nuff. Weak Oppose. Sorry. --User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig 21:35, September 27, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • You haven't formatted this request properly, and you should take grammar seriously as a mod. Since I cannot vote, this is just my thoughts on this. -->SkyDrift< 10:49, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
  • Link to last request (or, when was it?) ~ CJC 16:40, September 20, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

LFY1547

LFY1547 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (27 edits, 962 mainspace)

Hello, all. I've decided to (or at least attempt to) request CM rights today.

Have you been on Brickipedia for more than a few months, and made one hundred contributions to articles here?

Yes. (actually longer than just that), and yes.

Do you regularly participate responsibly on chat?

Yes, I'm on whenever I can be on, which is usually most of the second half of the day, and I try to be as friendly and mature as I can.

Do you already try your hardest to make chat a better place?

Yes. When a user uses a blocked word or violates another policy, I kindly remind them of that policy.

Thank you for your vote, whether it is an opposing vote, or a supporting one. :)

FellowshipOfTheBling (talk) 01:04, September 23, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Absolute yes. LFY is a great user, completely mature, and he totally can handle these rights! Gooo LFY! --- CM4S (talk) 01:08, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
  2. An actually sane user, who can be trusted with rights, and is also a good person. --User:CzechMate/czech 01:09, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per above User:NuffSaid/Sig
  4. Great, responsible user. Some of the past incidents with the LMBW had me worried at first, but upon looking into them again, I don't think they'll have too much of an impact on his actions here. BrickfilmNut (talk) 22:07, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Yes. -User:Mr.Brix/Sig
  6. Yes, Legofanyoda is a mature user and is on chat very often. Deserves Chat Moderator. --User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig 21:37, September 27, 2013 (UTC)
  7. - BF2 Talk 14:52, October 5, 2013 (UTC)
  8. Posting a vote for Meiko that he told me to post. He's still a member of the community, and even though Wikia globally blocked him, he still has a say in community votes like these. His reason: "Support, LFY is a positive user, and knows the rules well. I haven't seen him cause problems in a while, so I don't see what could go wrong with him having these rights." --Silence, Doctor (talk) (Posting for ToaMeiko) 19:56, October 19, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  • ~ CJC 11:31, September 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • User:Legoboy9373/sig 11:37, September 24, 2013 (UTC)
  • I agree with BFN for the most part, but something's keeping me from supporting. I don't know what it is...but it doesn't matter; this looks as if it will pass. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:57, September 27, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Per my skype conversation with Meiko, although I may change this vote. He's a little too...nosy. He gets up in everyone's business and makes comments. And it's annoying. MsD(talk) 23:26, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
    Hate to say it, but that sounds very hypocritical. --User:CzechMate/czech 23:36, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
    No it isn't. MsD(talk) 23:40, September 23, 2013 (UTC)

#He joined only ten days ago, so I reckon he should wait some more. User:Legoboy9373/sig 11:36, September 24, 2013 (UTC) (Moved to neutral)

  1. He seemed to be a good user at first, very active and such. But now I see him sort of... decaying... --Rainbow Girl Talk 15:39, September 28, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • I'll probably support in a short bit; there are just a few things I have to research first. BrickfilmNut (talk) 02:50, September 23, 2013 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was closed by request from nominee

The Rainbow Dasher (3)

The Rainbow Dasher (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (18 edits, 361 mainspace)

Right, I haven't done anything bad for quite a long time now also add all the other stuff since my last request. Do your stuff down there. --Rainbow Dasher! I'm a banana! 19:52, September 15, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. --Dragonknight86 (talk) 19:53, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Have seen a fair amount of improvement in this user's behaviour, and actively seeks to resolve in-chat issues. BrickfilmNut (talk) 19:53, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  3. TKOTW -- Now this is MassiveSodaDuck.
    19:59, September 15, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

  1. A nomination for this just closed a week ago, so this shouldn't even be open. (I'm not sure how long you are supposed to wait.) I've only seen you on chat once since it closed, and I've seen nothing to change my mind since. Berrybrick 19:57, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
    I believe it's two weeks that you have to wait.
    TKOTW -- Now this is MassiveSodaDuck.
    20:00, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
    So do I, but I can't find it recorded anywhere. Berrybrick 20:01, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Berry. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:18, September 15, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per Berry. User:LazerzSoH/signature
  2. TRD rarely says anything in chat, usually just uses an emote, no reason to have Chat Mod. - BF2 Talk 20:47, September 17, 2013 (UTC)
    BF2, you should really check the logs before you oppose, the reason I don't say much is because usally when you're around the main topic is "LEGO Galaxy" so I don't want to interupt. --Rainbow Dasher! I'm a banana! 17:55, September 18, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Berry. User:Legoboy9373/sig 18:16, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

MsD (3)

MsD (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (105 edits, 972 mainspace)

I'm active on chat, and I'm trusted with rollback and patroller rights here, and sysop over at Wikianswers LEGO, so what can go wrong? I've been here for almost two years, and have never been banned or blocked. MsDtalk 23:34, September 1, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Per my support last time. BrickfilmNut (talk) 16:40, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. MsD is quite well behaved on chat. Although he may be a little immature every once in a while, I don't think that's enough to keep me from supporting. --Legøfanyøda 01:11, September 8, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Your activity seems too inconsistent. You can go one month inactive, come back for a week, go inactive again, and then come back. I'm not sure. Additionally, some of your actions are occasionally out of line. I won't oppose yet, but I'm not sure I have enough reason to support. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:39, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Meiko on activity. ~ CJC 09:14, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Meiko for activity as well. -User:Mr.Brix/Sig
  4. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
  5. Per Meiko. --User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig 00:11, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
  6. User:Legoboy9373/sig 09:35, September 13, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Weak oppose. Per Meiko. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 23:43, September 1, 2013 (UTC)

  1. #Hardly see him on chat. -User:Mr.Brix/Sig
    You're kidding, right. I request to strike this vote, as he voted on both mine and Trace's noms with this reason, and Trace's was neutral and mine oppose. That makes no sense. MsDtalk 12:28, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    Struck. I don't see it as a valid oppose reason. If you want Mr Brix, put it as neutral. ~ CJC 16:53, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Very weak oppose. MsD is a friend, but I wouldn't trust him as a moderator. This is all based on past experiences. User:1999bug/sig1 02:39, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  3. I've known MsD for 2 years now. He is periodically very mature, but I've also had to face a different side of him on several occasions. I don't mean to put MsD down, he can be a great user, but I have had to block him for extended periods of time on the LMBW for trolling, duping, and impersonating. Aside from the trolling, most of it was awhile ago, and I like to think he has matured out of it, but I'm not fully confident. He is actually currently blocked on the LMBW right now for trolling. I don't see anything wrong with rollback/patroller rights, but I'd be very concerned about something like CM that is easier to abuse. Again, I mean no offense MsD..Drewlzoo
    Why would I ever abuse my rights. MsD(talk) 01:10, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per all above. User:LazerzSoH/signature

Comments

  • What account is this meant to be applied to if it passes? ~ CJC 20:30, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
    It won't. It's 2-3, would need 10 more supports to pass. But if it did it would be to the MsD account.
    TKOTW -- Now this is MassiveSodaDuck.
    20:38, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • Since he's leaving, should we close this? --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 18:05, September 18, 2013 (UTC)
    • Same reason the last request closed if so :P ~ CJC 18:02, September 18, 2013 (UTC)
      • Actually, it should have closed a few days ago anyway. ~ CJC 18:03, September 18, 2013 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

Awesomeknight1234

Awesomeknight1234 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

Knight is a good, active chatter, and doesn't violate policy at all. He's one of the more-trustworthy users I can think of, so I feel he could be trusted with chat moderator rights. He's also very sociable and welcoming to new users, which is good to have in a moderator. ToaMeiko (talk) 23:52, September 1, 2013 (UTC)

Support

As nominator. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:52, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
Tentative support. Will see how it goes. --User:CzechMate/czech 23:57, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
  1. YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS --- CM4S (talk) 23:57, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
    Seems legit. --User:CzechMate/czech 23:58, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Of course. MsDtalk 00:19, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Not the most friendly user I've ever met, but I think he knows how to handle power. --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 00:28, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    What do you mean not friendly? Most of those times it's obviously a joke. :P --Knight
    Maybe it's my gut talking to me --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 00:34, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
    :P —Unsigned comment by Awesomeknight1234 (talk • contribs).
  4. OK. ~ CJC 09:14, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
  5. I see him on chat very often and has potential for CM.-User:Mr.Brix/Sig
  6. Yes. User:Legoboy9373/sig 19:03, September 2, 2013 (TC)
  7. Haven't had any issues with him. BrickfilmNut (talk) 16:39, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  8. Per others. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 20:08, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
  9. I'd be willing to try it again. During his initial run as moderator, he did very well. User:1999bug/sig1 02:41, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  10. Per Bug. User:LazerzSoH/signature
  11. Yes. Knight is very well-behaved and mature on chat, I think he'd do good as a Moderator. --Legøfanyøda 01:08, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
  12. Per everyone. :P --User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig 00:14, September 12, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. I realize now Knight wasn't the one at the most fault, but merely feeding into the situation at the wrong time. Others involved are still being debated what will be done. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:42, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I'm not fully aware of what's been going on involving Knight, but I have never been completely comfortable with him having CM rights. Drewlzoo

Oppose

  1. Today he was harassing ToaMeiko on chat, so do not trust for for these rights. --User:CzechMate/czech 22:54, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    Chatlog? —Unsigned comment by ErkelonJay (talk • contribs).
    MediaWiki:Chat/Logs/04 September 2013, just do Ctrl+F for "#hashtag", as that's about when it starts. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:00, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    Per above. Unacceptable, and put me in a defenseless position, as it was several users partaking in harassment, even as a moderator, as the other online moderator was feeding in to the negativity. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:00, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    Switching to neutral. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:42, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    That wasn't harassment, it was you acting up under stress. >_> MsDtalk 23:05, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    And it was you continuing to argue about it, and using disrespectful sarcasm even though I asked you to stop twice. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:09, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    Can you please point to me where I used sarcasm? MsDtalk 23:09, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
    I actually did not use any hashtags as much as other users, only once I recall. And I think you were acting up about it. If it had spaces and no hashtags, you wouldn't have freaking out, so I don't see any problem. I guess it could be considered some disrespect, but not too much. --Knight
    It bothers me how you're accusing people who tried to stand up for Nuff and I of wrongdoing. Blame me fully, if you wish, because I was in the wrong. They were only trying to remedy an uneasy situation, which had both of us acting negatively. Honestly, it was ridiculous on both of our parts, Meiko. User:1999bug/sig1 01:26, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Concerns regarding inappropriate remarks (one of which got him kicked just recently), ability to cope with pressure and prejudice. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 23:49, September 4, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Is it not true Meiko has linked videos with inappropriate words in them? —Unsigned comment by Awesomeknight1234 (talk • contribs).
    What does this have to do with me? --ToaMeiko (talk) 01:18, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
    Nothing, but I would like to say that if a chat mod can't hint at stuff, an admin can not link multiple times videos with inappropriate titles. --Knight

Comments

  • I accept this nomination. I think it's about time, but I think I'll fail. --Knight
  • Anyone have a snippet of the chat they are referring to? I looked through the logs, but I didn't see anything from Knight that I'd consider harassment. Berrybrick 23:06, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • Okay, but when should I stop? I'm not seeing anything but a pointless argument. Berrybrick 23:11, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • When one of the belligerents leaves the chat. That happens a few minutes in. --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 23:12, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • Meiko? If that's it, then I don't see what Knight did wrong. I feel that if they are going to oppose him for it, then Bug's position as mod should be under question. Berrybrick 23:15, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per above, the two opposes are pointless. MsDtalk 23:15, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • So apparently Meiko got mad because they used some hashtags or something? --- CM4S (talk) 23:17, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • I think so. Then again, chat usually doesn't have a point anyway. --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 23:21, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • I can have my own opinion. I didn't ask for you to agree with it. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:25, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • That's like me getting mad because you post so many song links. Doesn't seem like much of a reason to oppose. --- CM4S (talk) 23:27, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • ^^ MsDtalk 23:28, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • To clarify the chat logs, I have not, nor do I plan on, committing murder. Any allegations to the contrary are slander. ~ CJC 23:36, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • OK, I don't have the time to say anything "fancy" or professional, so I'll just say my opinion right now and try to elaborate it some other time. The whole hashtag thing was kind of irrelevant, and Meiko was totally in the right to point out the that it was unnecessary. Because, well, it was. It added no value, and didn't have to be extended to the point where it started annoying people (isn't the whole point of chat rules to keep everyone happy?). Of course, saying that, Meiko, did this one little issue really need to be extended to an oppose? I mean, it wasn't huge. This is the kind of thing that, like everyone else has been saying, is better suited for talk pages or private messages. BrickfilmNut (talk) 01:24, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • My oppostion was in regard to the reaction I received, and the reaction I received for asking the conversation be dropped. After reviewing the logs again, it's not Knight I'm concerned about anymore, so I've switched to neutral. --ToaMeiko (talk) 01:28, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • I resign this request. After seeing many user's reactions I've seen I've been an idiot. --Knight
  • No, you haven't. --- CM4S (talk) 01:31, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • I agree with CM4S, you haven't been an idiot, only the people around you. You shouldn't have this taken down. User:1999bug/sig1 02:44, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • You don't have any reason to. Keep it up. You're going to get them anyway. --- CM4S (talk) 03:03, September 5, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

Agent Trace

Agent Trace (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I'm on chat a bit, and I'l like to have a go at moderation. User:Agent Trace/sig1 01:17, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Alright. Although he's a liiiiiiiiiitle sketchy activity-wise, he's one of the more mature Brickipedia users and I see some benefits coming from this. MsDtalk 01:22, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. When this user is in chat, they are always appropriate. If they can manage to enforce the rules, I can't see what could go wrong. A bit per Jeyo, but I'd be willing to let this user have a shot with chat moderator rights. --ToaMeiko (talk) 01:35, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Meiko.

Darth henry The Dojo Turtles! 02:04, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Sure, they've been away for a while, but both before then and since they have been an exemplar member of the community. ~ CJC 20:24, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per MsD and the first bit of my neutral vote. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 05:55, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Trace does seem like a level-headed, trustworthy user, but I haven't seen him/her enough to vote either way. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 01:19, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

  1. ^ Berrybrick 01:20, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ^^ --User:CzechMate/czech 02:08, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Never seen the user on chat. User:Legoboy9373/sig 12:59, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per Jeyo. If I see him in chat more often, I'll probably switch to "Support". BrickfilmNut (talk) 04:56, August 23, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Never seen Trace on chat... -User:Mr.Brix/Sig

Oppose

Comments

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 01:55, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

    • Oh so all the agents are related! :o I'd been wondering about that for a while haha. --ToaMeiko (talk) 02:00, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
      • What about Agent Swipe? --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 20:27, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
        • Probably just because Agents was out at the time, and both Swipe and Fuse/Charge/Trace had the same idea :P. ~ CJC 20:30, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
          • Swipe isn't their sibling, no. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:00, August 22, 2013 (UTC)

  • Does anyone have a problem with me closing this early? Four more days can be a boring wait and Trace's success is imminent. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 05:55, September 3, 2013 (UTC)

    • I don't ~ CJC 10:46, September 3, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Mr.Brix

Mr.Brix (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I think I should be a Chat Mod because I am on chat a lot and many users have said that I am responsible and fit for the job. So I thought I should request it.

Support


Neutral

  1. Haven't seen you enough on chat to come up with a decision one way or the other. BrickfilmNut (talk) 16:22, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per BFN. User:Legoboy9373/sig 15:58, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
  3. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
  4. Brix is a shining example of an active, appropriate user in the Brickipedia community. I've never seen him act out, disrespect another individual, or cause moderators or admins any trouble. However, I have not seen him in chat as much as I think he should be to have chat moderator rights. I have been away for a week though, so I'm not sure how things have been during that time. I would like to see one thing from Brix though, that being enforcing the policy. He does a great job following it, and if he has the ability to correctly enforce it, he'd be a great moderator. Leaning towards support. --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:54, August 17, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I wouldn't say that's necessarily a reason. I don't think you're ready yet. --- Sci (talk) 16:15, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Not ready- though I respect your feelings that you want to be a chat mod, you seem like a fit person for the job but that's not the reason I'm opposing. Being a chat mod is about being there anytime you can. We barely see you on chat unless you want to bring something towards our attention. So I believe that if you are on chat more over the course of the next few days and promise to dedicate some time everyday to patrol chat. I might change my opinion. Thinking with Bricks! 16:27, August 10, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid
  3. Sorry, I just don't think you're ready. You should be on Chat a little more, and per Nuff, you should be on Chat to patrol as a Moderator, not just to show us something. Maybe in a couple months I'll change my opinion. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig 16:31, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
  4. As per others, I know you'll be ready soon enough, just not yet. Per Nuff really. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 16:38, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
  5. (sorry about my inactivity, I'm trying to quit Wikia.) I dont know exactly what blunt means, but I think this may be: You overreact to everything, aren't welcoming, don't already make the chat a better place, don't really seem to care about the chat, etc. MsDtalk 01:54, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Mostly per MsD (except that's not how I use blunt) and you don't exactly overreact to everything. Berrybrick 01:23, August 22, 2013 (UTC
  7. I haven't been on chat a lot in the past few weeks but when I was on, you weren't on a lot Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg

Comments

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

RaceLord

RaceLord (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (191 edits, 7,636 mainspace)

I have been thinking about this for awhile, and think CM4S gave me the pushy type thingy on chat. CM4Sci: "race apply for chat mod" "i don't get why you don't have them".

But guess most people will be Oppose or Neutral saying "not mature enough", "explodes to much", "might be crazy", "doesn't like pie", or "I hate him".

I really think all/most of those arn't real reasons for someone not to be chat mod, some are just random ones I thought of. Who cares if the chat mod is a little random? They just need to be not be crazy with the kicks and bans and not be spamming stuff all the time.

Guessing this will be a question: "you even giving a reason for you to be chat mod, man?" Maybe i'm not, maybe I am, maybe i'm Deadpool.

But guessing CM4S told me that because someone was being a noob (possible puppet) and Berry, Storm, and BFN were all AFK. And maybe because i'm on a lot. Idk if he was joking or not.

Idk why i'm still adding stuff on, choose which to go with! Support, Neutral, or Oppose. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.

Support

  1. Definite support. There have been too many incidents where mods are on and are not doing their job. I trust this user. --- CM4S (talk) 20:05, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Being a chat mod myself, and knowing that Racelord has been on this wiki for quite some time (I don't actually know that.... okay just looked it up, and yeah he's been here for a while) I believe Racelord should be a chat mod. With 13,021 edits, Rank 15 on the wiki and an occupation of "stuff" there is no doubt Racelord will make a good chat mod. Creeper S (talk) 20:13, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
  3. *scrolls on Brickipedia for something interesting* *remembers this page* *scrolls to bottom* "HELL YES!" MsDtalk 00:33, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Per Berry, in some way, except I don't feel quite as strongly as him. While you certainly could use the rights in some instances, are in chat quite frequently, and are a user that I respect a fair amount, whenever you do chat, it is something, just, well, random. And that's not bad; it can be a little entertaining, but it's not always the most constructive either. Also, there have been a few Brickimedia-related conflicts that still stick in my mind and have me mildly worried. BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:24, August 16, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Though I can think of worse options, RaceLord does not put very much attention on chat. He'll often go away, come back hours later, and ask what is going on in the middle of an (often pretty clear) conversation. Aside from that, it is rather annoying how he pretends to kill, explode, and a plethora of other violent actions which are borderline spam. Also, I think that a mod should be able to maintain a certain quality of grammar, and RaceLord can be hard to understand and doesn't even capitalize his is. (I would not oppose if that was my only reason, but I do want to bring this up.) Also, his "logic" is often just saying that someone is wrong, no matter how sensible they are being. For an example of that, look here. (Not exactly his logic, but it's the same line of thinking in some of the things he said to Meiko.) And yes, not being mature enough is a huge reason not to be a chat moderator. Berrybrick 20:17, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
    ok...... being random is what I am, telling me not to be random is like telling The Runaway Guys on youtube to be normal ("tried" once, worst video ever). I don't bother to have "I" in cap because I type fast and don't bother. Grammer, you mean when I say "jsut" and "soemone"? Thats from typing fast. "He'll often go away, come back hours later", I am usually playing Minecraft, World of Warcraft, or watching stuff on youtube. "ask what is going on in the middle of an (often pretty clear) conversation", um.... most of the timeI come back and something random is going on that I don't understand without going back and reading past words. "pretends to kill, explode, and a plethora of other violent actions" I watch shows like NCIS, Castle, and Hawaii Five-0 and play/watch-videos-of games with guns, swords, and other crazy stuff. "not being mature enough is a huge reason not to be a chat moderator", Meiko explodes sometimes, and what is your version of being mature? Think I answered everything, or almost everything. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
    Where did I tell you not to be random? And no, I don't mean "jsut" and the likes. I mostly meant not capitalizing, but like I said, it's not a big deal. You're just explaining why you don't focus on chat, which doesn't make a difference. Yes, sometimes something random is going on, but it happens in normal conversation too. Watching/playing violent shows/games doesn't make a difference. My "version" of being mature includes not being so random. Again, I'm not asking you to change, but it's a bit excessive and not something I like to see so much out of a mod. Berrybrick 20:44, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
    You didn't, i'm saying telling me not to be random is like that. I only capitalizing when its important, like if I was editing a page or something. Don't think capitalizing on chat is to important, but you did say "it's not a big deal." I don't need to focus on chat, chat isn't my life. Don't think I have anything to say about the random stuff on chat part. "Watching/playing violent shows/games doesn't make a difference" what does that mean? "being mature includes not being so random", don't think I have anything to say about that. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
    Yes, which is why that isn't relevant. I do think that using good grammar is important (when you aren't in a hurry) and is part of being mature. Again, I wouldn't oppose solely based on that. Chat doesn't need to have your sole focus when you are a mod, but I don't think that you give it enough focus as it is. Like I said, you often leave for hours at a time (which is fine, like you said, you have better things to do) but you return in the middle of a conversation without understanding what is happening and don't make too much of an effort to find out what was happening. What I meant by saying that it doesn't make a difference is that I feel my points still stand despite that. Berrybrick 20:59, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
    Don't get why all of you go to the bads and not the goods RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
    RaceLord, yes, there are good things about you but they don't outweigh the reasons why I don't think you should be a mod. It doesn't make you a bad person, I just don't think it's a good fit. I couldn't handle being a doctor or security guard, but that doesn't make me a bad person. Berrybrick 21:23, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
    You just confused me. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
  2. While I can only read a few replies to this since I'm on a phone with limited time to spare, I can say that RaceLord is a great member of the community, but does not engage in chat enough compared to the amount of time he spends AFK. He also "spams", although it's not in bad faith, but he does make some pointless messages that get old after a while. He often makes some inappropriate remarks regarding other members. I'd go in more detail but need to leave. I may expand on this later. --ToaMeiko (talk) 21:04, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Berry. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:19, August 16, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per Meiko ~ CJC 20:32, August 17, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Berry, and Meiko. --User:CzechMate/czech 00:35, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

Comments


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccesful; doesn't like chatting here anymore...

MsD (2)

MsD (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (105 edits, 972 mainspace)

I was told by a few users that I should renominate myself. So, that's what I'm gonna do. :P This is my second request, my first one is located in the archive.

I'm MsD, a user and editor of Brickipedia since October of 2011. First things first, the checklist.

  • Have you been on Brickipedia for more than a few months, and made one hundred contributions to articles here?

Yep, and I have more than 760 mainspace edits, with quality enough to earn me patroller and rollback rights, and administrator at Wikianswers LEGO. This helps show my dedication towards the LEGO wikis and my means to make this chat a better place as well.

  • Do you regularly participate responsibly on chat?

Yep. I'm on most every day, help new users, and I don't spam. And even when I am angry (which doesn't happen a lot), I have lots of self-control.

  • Do you already try your hardest to make chat a better place?

Yes. I don't spam, I don't pick fights with people, I like to talk, and I don't really have any "enemies". :3

Now for some extra stuff. Despite some of the opposes I got, I'm not a spammer. In fact, I revert spam almost every day. I don't troll, either. :P Now, during the incident with Clone and CM4S I was pretty angry, but me and CM4S get along now and Clone doesn't really talk to me anymore. So, I don't hold grudges, which is a good thing for a ChatMod. I am always willing to help anyone who needs it, as I am knowledgeable with things relating to LEGO and Wikis. Also, those of you that neutral'd and opposed me because I'm a LMBW-er, I'm not, and I requested a permablock there. I'd love to voulenteer as a CM here, and I think I'd do well with these rights, as do Meiko, Jeyo, LFY, and Nuff. :D MsDtalk 19:18, August 3, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Great user, on chat a lot, has matured. I think he is ready for this job. Though with a rough past with conflicts I mean, you gave me rights! FULL SUPPORT. Thinking with Bricks! 19:21, August 3, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid
  2. User has, over the last little while, proven himself trustworthy and dedicated to the community. Support. BrickfilmNut (talk) 19:28, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per BFN. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 20:14, August 3, 2013 (UTC) #Uh, sure I guess. Won't hurt. --- Sci (talk) 22:28, August 5, 2013 (UTC) (I still support you)

  1. Mature user, on Chat a lot. --User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig

Neutral

  1. Per BFN, but also Meiko. Berrybrick 15:58, August 6, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Just not yet. You've been doing great, but the occasional problems are not good ones. For example, you left in a fit after your first RfCM was not going the direction you intended, blamed it on two user's, and left dramatically. I'd rather not see a user holding rights be doing that when they are faced with a problem or conflict. --ToaMeiko (talk) 22:31, August 5, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Meiko. User:Legoboy9373/sig 09:23, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Meiko RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
  4. Any problems or fits with the community will not gain my support, I'm going to have to say no. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 16:38, August 10, 2013 (UTC)

#Per Meiko --Village.gw105 (talk) 20:55, August 17, 2013 (UTC)

Struck, less than 100 mainspace edits to articles on Brickipedia. MsDtalk 00:36, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
Only admins can struck, as far as I am aware... --User:CzechMate/czech 00:44, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
Does it matter? --User:ErkelonJay/sig1 00:49, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • We get along? --- Sci (talk) 19:23, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
    • It probably means you don't fight. Do you?--User:ErkelonJay/sig1 19:25, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
      • We get along. We don't fight, I supported his emotes thing, and I think he's a fine Brickipedian. MsDtalk 19:26, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
  • A little late to the party, but below it says you are trying to quit Wikia? ~ CJC 09:36, August 18, 2013 (UTC)


Edward Nigma[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was no verdict

Edward Nigma (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (3,128 edits, 3,097 mainspace)

Never have I ever seen someone more mature and friendly on chat (except maybe Meiko when he first joined :P ). He's been here more than a year, he's on chat a lot, clearly knows the rules, makes good, needed edits, and is just simply dedicated, mature, and worthy of a few extra buttons to make this chat a better place. MsDtalk 17:26, August 1, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator. MsDtalk 17:26, August 1, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. He's been making great edits recently, but I haven't seen him on chat but a few times. I think he should start with patroller/rollback rights here, honestly, but I'm certainly not going to oppose if he feels he's ready for chat moderator. --ToaMeiko (talk) 18:57, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Meiko. Berrybrick 18:58, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Not really seen this user in chat before. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
    Not even as MassiveSodaDuck? --- Sci (talk) 19:24, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ~ CJC 21:17, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Still not sure. --- Sci (talk) 19:24, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Per Meiko BrickfilmNut (talk) 19:28, August 3, 2013 (UTC)
  7. ^--

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:58, August 3, 2013 (UTC)

  1. ^--User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  2. User:Legoboy9373/sig 09:20, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
  3. I can't oppose it, but not on chat enough for me to support. Per Meiko as well. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 16:38, August 10, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Never seen this person on chat RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
  2. Per RL, I really haven't either. --- Sci (talk) 12:22, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
    Isn't not seeing a nominee in chat only grounds for a "Neutral", not an "Oppose"? BrickfilmNut (talk) 13:26, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
    There's no rule about it, but most people ere on good faith and just go neutral. Not sure if its considered a valid oppose reason or not. ~ CJC 21:49, August 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • Don't RfRs have to be self-nominations? --ToaMeiko (talk) 18:57, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  • I don't see why. Berrybrick 18:58, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  • Not necessarily; LazerzSoH nominated me for Admin. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:44, August 1, 2013 (UTC)

  • Tbh, the rules regarding RfR's could probably do with centralising and sorting, as people keep citing rules I thought we'd never had/dropped a year ago, etc. ~ CJC 21:18, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  • I agree, another rule being the 80% support, since I've seen people recently get them for just having over 50% I think. --ToaMeiko (talk) 21:25, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  • I thought we stopped using that in maybe 2011 or early 2012, when there was a big push on consensus, I didn't realise it still said it at the top of the page. I think 80% is a rather arbitrary target to be fair. If I have to close stuff, and it is not clear cut, I'd just take into accounts reasons for opposes and supports and judge it on that. (or, UCS.) Anyway, this is something that belongs on a forum and not here, so I guess we should stop discussing it here :P ~ CJC 21:32, August 1, 2013 (UTC)
  • I was ignoring this discussion before, until I read that the 80% rule wasn't still in place. When I only had like 1 opposer and 6 supporters before CGCJ came in, I asked Ajr about that rule, because if that wasn't in place that meant it was successful. He said it was still in place, and that when I got 80% I could contact him and I'd get the rights. (note that I'm not asking for anything, I'm just pointing it out) MsDtalk 21:42, August 1, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was not succesful

MsD

MsD (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (105 edits, 972 mainspace)

I'm selfnomming myself to become a new chat moderator. I think I'd do good in this position because;

  • I'm trustable. I mean, I make good edits, I do good with Patroller, and I wrote that one good review, and I do it every day. So, what can go wrong with an extra responsibility on my hands?
  • I'm familiar with the rights. When the Yoshi Wiki was really active, I gained sysop and moderated chat, so I got familiar with the chat mod stuff.
  • I'm respected, and respectable. I cannot name one person who regularly goes to this wiki that openly dislikes me. And also, I cannot name one person that I really do not like (other than spammers, they bug me to pieces ._.).
  • I'm a good community member. I'm used to the community, as I've been coming to this chat since December of 2011. I fit in well with the rest of the community, too. I've also never been blocked or banned from chat. I am also a large anti vandal, as I revert spam and vandalism within usually the first couple minutes of it being done.
  • I'm active. Just ask Meiko or CM4S, I've been on chat nearly every day since Brickimedia's closure.

Oh yeah, and here's a quote by Mr. Meiko: "If he improved some of his actions, he'd actually be fine. He's a knowledgeable user, understands how wikis work, and is able to identify the strong and weak points a wiki and its community has." MsDtalk (July 15, 2013)

Support

  1. I don't really see where he needs to improve - he's been very mature and behaved on chat since I've seen him here. He has my full support. {{SUBST:User:Winklemeyer/Winksig}} (Legofanyoda)
  2. €ħɨþ-Ŧɦé-ΣǭuƖɲØж 20:20, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
    Changing to support. You are quite respectful, know the rules, are in chat frequently and usually do a good job with self-control. --ToaMeiko (talk) 22:12, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Still Per Meiko - and due to inconsistency of my vote between different requests of similar cases. ~ CJC 22:17, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Is in chat a lot. Clonetrooperfan2207 (talk) 03:16, July 16, 2013 (UTC)Clonetrooperfan2207
  5. MsD would be a great chatmod, he comes on chat(s) a lot and likes Lego a lot. He's been a great chatmod for other wikis (as ive seen) so I do think he should be a chatmod :) --Swiggity Swag What's In The Bag? (talk) 14:19, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
  6. I like this fellow, and he makes quality edits. I believe he would make a good chat mod. --User:Dr. Satl, M.D.
  7. Looks good. User:Darth henry/Sig 17:49, July 18, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Just a few things he could improve on, but he's a positive influence on the community nonetheless. I'm neutral. --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:01, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Neutral as well. BrickfilmNut (talk) 21:00, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  3. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
  4. Per Meiko - wait a month or two ~ CJC 21:53, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per Berry, and somewhat Dino. --User:CzechMate/czech 22:19, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Leaning toward support, but I don't think he's quite there yet. I guess per Meiko. --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 04:02, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Switching to neutral. --- Sci (talk) 19:12, July 17, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I'm only here because it was linked in chat... it seems my vote issss neutral. Creeper S (talk) 19:32, July 18, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Even though he has improved and is also a helpful user, he could improve. (No hard feelings man.) --Dino2012! FEAR ME!!! ROAAAR!!! 19:51, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. He has been better in the last few weeks, but he does have a fairly recent history of trolling. Berrybrick 20:03, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per Berry Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
  4. He seems like a user who would troll and spam, I just don't trust that he's mature enough for the Chat Mod right. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  5. I really don't like taking part in these things, but I just have to say, this user is really obnonxious most of the time. The Doctor (Fantastic!)
    1. Seeing as how you're on chat for about once a week, and how you troll the LMBW constantly... MsDtalk 21:40, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
      1. Once a week? I was only on vacation this past week and I don't constantly troll LMBW.
        You always insist that everything I do is trolling LMBW and, like with everything else, get very annoying. I don't completely like the fact that you comment on an oppose. It's like you are trying to defend yourself from something that isn't worth defending yourself from. It doesn't assure me that you would be a decent mod. And as I said, you get annoying at times. The Doctor (Fantastic!)
        1. And this isnt the LMBW MsD so don't bring that wiki up here.. Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
  6. Per above statements. --- Sci (talk) 19:12, July 17, 2013 (UTC)
    1. That seems a bit inadequate to me... Because he pointed out you're banned, you switched to oppose? --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 21:43, July 18, 2013 (UTC)

      1. Per Jeyo. Slashing. Berrybrick 21:47, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per Berry's first message up above. User:Legoboy9373/sig 19:49, July 20, 2013 (UTC)
  3. A few days ago he told me he was not going to use Brickipedia anymore because of two users. Unaccpetable IMO. --ToaMeiko (talk) 17:17, July 23, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • I also don't like the colours of this stuff. --Dino2012! FEAR ME!!! ROAAAR!!! 19:52, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
    • The sole reason I added the colours is because I had a giant wall of text, so I wanted to make the buttons clearer. Sorry if it bothered you. MsDtalk 19:53, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  • According to MsD, he has "quit" Brickipedia, and his reason is because he doesn't like two users. Should we go ahead and close/archive this? --ToaMeiko (talk) 20:03, July 19, 2013 (UTC)
  • This is probably a more reasonable reason to close this. The chances he'll be able to be active are slim at this point. --ToaMeiko (talk) 17:17, July 23, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful due to chatban

CM4Sci

CM4Sci (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (136 edits, 378 mainspace)

Seeing as it has been many many months since I last requested, I decided to give it another shot. It's been forever, and I can change. But none of you believe in me. Not much has happened, really. And there has been somewhat (in my opinion) an increase in nonsense in chat. One of the more "active" users, if that means anything. I've been waiting to do this, so let's see what happens! Yay! - Sci (talk) 22:08, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Yes. CM4S is amazing. -MassiveSodaDuck{{{1}}} 22:09, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Why not? In chat a lot, behaved as far as I can tell, etc. ~ CJC 22:15, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  3. CM4S is a good friend, and can take the responsibility, and is a chat mod that would not be boring. --Knight
  4. €ħɨþ-Ŧɦé-ΣǭuƖɲØж 05:36, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per CJC. User:SKP4472/sig3 10:47, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. um..........RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
    You've improved a lot for sure. You still occasionally are a bit rude to some users, but I think if you improve on the politeness/respect you deliver in chat, you'd be fine. You really need to do that before you earn these right though, since you can't act like that as a CM. --ToaMeiko (talk) 22:22, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I'll likely change to support later, as Sci was admin on Brickimedia's customs wiki and it didn't look like any harm came out of it. I'll admit, though, that there have been some moments of instability that I need to consider before changing. As such, I'm neutral for now. BrickfilmNut (talk) 00:51, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I honestly just still don't think CM4S is mature enough for this role, there is too much past evidence to say this is not a good position for him. --User:CzechMate/czech 22:12, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Sorry but your banned way to often, particularly by Cligra(if he was still here), and you technically are a sockpuppet, you get fustrated and start using caps lock when people call you Cody, even though it is your name and per Czech Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
  3. From my neutral, you really need to be more polite and respectful to users. You swear way too much, and the frequent personal attacks are more than you can get by with. --ToaMeiko (talk) 23:07, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  4. There was a rule that said that anyone who got a Warn2 or higher couldn't get any rights. From what I heard, you waaaaaay outstripped that. --Jay, keep calm, and sharpen your sword. 00:53, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
    There's never been a rule like that here. --- Sci (talk) 03:15, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
I thought I heard that somewhere... --Jay, keep calm, and sharpen your sword. 17:46, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
  1. I can't bring myself to support. You have had chat mod, twice I think, and have had it stripped. Per Czech. Berrybrick 03:12, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
    Once. Middle of 2011, I think. --- Sci (talk) 03:15, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Sci has recently been rather moody to say the least and has proven himself to be very volatile/violent and easily provoked. Oh, and the first three people to oppose -- Czech, Meiko and Soup -- you should not have been provoking him about the "dog running gag" like that. Instead, you could have been telling off those who started it/were also doing it. In other words, acting as a moderator should. (Though I'm not saying his reaction was in any way appropriate.) --

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 03:51, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • Was considering changing vote due to an incidence in chat, but in doing so, I'd also have to retroactively retract the support for the chat mods and users who it seemed to me intentionally provoked him (despite what I gather is an admin previously telling them to stop provoking him with that) to give them (and everyone else in chat at the time) a reason to oppose. ~ CJC 09:13, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
  • After a recent event, CM4S got himself banned from chat per consensus from myself and CzechMate. That voids this RfR, correct? --ToaMeiko (talk) 00:46, July 17, 2013 (UTC)
  • Berry confirmed on chat that this RfR will be archived as unsuccessful. -MassiveSodaDuck{{{1}}} 01:06, July 17, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

ToaThyre

ToaThyre (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

Hi! I think I should be nominated for a few reasons. First, I'm on chat pretty often, so I could moderate a lot. Second, I wouldn't abuse power or anything. Third, I think think I could really help keep chat safe. A few people probably will say I have trolled, and I might have. However I really feel I have changed. Please comment on anything on my talk page. Thanks for reading and considering! ToaThyre (talk) 18:54, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  1. Not sure who you are. Never seen you on chat despite claims you are there pretty often, which suggests either from Aus/NZ/Far East or a different definition of pretty often, never spoke to you. (And from what I gather below, joined today.) ~ CJC 21:57, July 15, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. You just joined today, for one thing. Berrybrick 18:53, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  2. You didn't even format this right. User:MsD/SigCode
  3. Per Berry. You should try for this later on. --ToaMeiko (talk) 18:56, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  4. You just joined today, you have one edit and you have Toa in your name. :P --Dino2012! FEAR ME!!! ROAAAR!!! 19:03, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
  5. You joined a few hours ago RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.

Comments

  • Be sure to read the RfCM checklist before adding a request. You don't qualify yet, but stick around and keep editing and you can file a new request later on. :) --ToaMeiko (talk) 19:08, July 15, 2013 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

SuperSpyX

SuperSpyX (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (22 edits, 1,977 mainspace)

I'm not gonna be editing any more but I will be on chat. I definitely have gotten better, several users have said so. User:SuperSpyX/Sig3 19:46, June 30, 2013 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. He dosn't trust female users..., and I rarely see him on chat Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
Lol, what? --- Sci (talk) 15:06, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
He said we should watch female users , as there all rude or somthing along those lines Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
That was LOOOONG ago. I haven't said it recently. User:SuperSpyX/Sig3
It was in March.. Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg

Comments

NuffSaid[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

NuffSaid (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I want to be a chatmod (4th time's a charm... Right?) Well this time I really have changed. I helped others with LEGO related questions. I get along with others, I try very hard to not jump to conclusions. And all of us know LMBW invasions are in fact annoying. Those are 4 reasons why I really want to be chat mod and I really think I am ready for this position. Thinking with Bricks! 14:53, June 29, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid

Support

  1. I don't quite understand/relate to/agree with your fourth reason for running for chat moderator, but you have always behaved in chat and seem like you could handle it. BrickfilmNut (talk) 15:06, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  2. You've matured, while still being the fun user you were before. I think you'd handle the rights well, especially since you're always on chat and don't pick random fights with people. -MassiveSodaDuck 22:29, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Sure. Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:41, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per BFN. Berrybrick 22:43, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  5. ToaMeiko (talk) 02:14, June 30, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Sure. --- Sci (talk) 15:21, June 30, 2013 (UTC)
  7. I always thought you should become a mod. User:Irnakk/sig3
  8. Per Irnakk. User:Legoboy9373/sig 18:22, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
  9. OK ~ CJC 15:35, July 3, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
  2. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.

Oppose

Comments

  • Don't you need 100 edits mainspace? Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
    • I don't think it matters, that was the case for the last 3. Thinking with Bricks! 15:32, June 30, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid
    • Even though Nuff hasn't made 100 mainspace, he's done a lot of customs, which is still a content namespace on the wiki. --ToaMeiko (talk) 19:41, July 2, 2013 (UTC)
The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Dino2012

Dino2012 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I'm on chat a lot of the time, everyone knows me and I'm nice. Dino2012! FEAR ME!!! ROAAAR!!! 19:29, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  • Not sure if he has changed since the instances I am about to mention, but I have seen several cases where he has disrupted chat and gotten into conflict with other users. He seems to be improving, but I'm not ready to support just yet. BrickfilmNut (talk) 19:37, June 24, 2013 (UTC) Changed to "Oppose".
  • Don't really now you (Although if someone gives me the link to the logs of whatever day the below happened, may change to oppose) ~ CJC 15:35, July 3, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. You were making quite disgusting comments on chat a couple days ago, even when people and mods told you to stop, and then challenged Meiko for no reason. So no. -MassiveSodaDuck 21:22, June 28, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Has made some... questionable comments on the same day that he started running for chat mod. Don't feel he's quite ready yet. BrickfilmNut (talk) 15:06, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Per BFN Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
  4. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.

Comments


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

TheBakonBitz

TheBakonBitz (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (10 edits, 0 mainspace)

I've been on the wiki for about a year now and feel I've made some pretty quality edits. (Just over 500) Once Brickimedia was created most of the admins moved and Brickipedia was unprotected. After the recent fall of Brickimedia most of the admins left for good and Brickipedia is more prone to violators. I really want to help to bring Brickipedia back to top shape. Chat Mod will be the first step in stopping these violators and I hope to use these rights to stop as much as I can. TheBakonBitz My Talkpage 22:23, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. I've never seen you on chat. -MassiveSodaDuck 22:27, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
    I go on chat quite often, but everyone is always AFK so I leave right away. I will definitely start staying on chat longer if this is a requirement for these rights. TheBakonBitz My Talkpage 22:31, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
    Think about it: Should someone running for chat mod be active on chat? Berrybrick 22:33, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Per MsD I also really want to know people before I think they are ready. Thinking with Bricks! 22:29, June 29, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid
  3. Someone running for chatmod should definitely be active on chat beforehand... Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:42, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per Ajr. :/ Berrybrick 22:43, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per Berry Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
  6. Per Ajr. User:Legoboy9373/sig 18:23, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Never seen on Chat. ~ CJC 15:35, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
  8. Who are you? User:Irnakk/sig3
  9. RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.

Comments

  • Actually, chat is pretty secure.... Berrybrick 22:26, June 29, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

NuffSaid1995

NuffSaid1995 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I think this may or may not be early or late but as a wise man once said "A wizard is never too late or early." But I'm not a wizard so let's put that comment aside. I believe I can be chat mod. I can help others and also have responsibility of the rights such as banning or kicking, but I could leave some of the banning to more CM's that have done it before. But I come to a case as stating on times that chat-mods are not on how can we stop a spammer or sockpuppet? Well you may want someone like me who is frequently on at early hours... I have stopped a sockpuppet (finnfan99/ComicsRus/GravityFallsFTW) I have somewhat come to a conclusion to say I may be mature enough for this role. But I guess the choice is for you, the staff and community to decide. So please be honest! Thinking with Bricks! 03:41, March 1, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid1995

HERE IS EVIDENCE OF ME CATCHING COMICSRUS: http://legodude101.wikia.com/wiki/Special:NewFiles

Support

  1. Changed to support. Nuff is definitely one of our most-mature non-mods, and has been here for a while. I have never had a problem with him on chat, and if the example he provided is true, I now feel confident enough to support. User:BrickfilmNut/sig
  2. Changed to support if he really wants to stay here. User:Darth henry/Sig 04:24, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
  3. I think you are nice and are deserving of it. I am proud to support you! ~Cap.America
  4. Per everyone Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
  5. User:Hunterkiller1440/sig
  6. Youve been here for a long time. Ive known you for just a while, but i think you totaly deserve it. 20:42 Finnish time 18th of March 2013. User:Korppufin and lets see does my sig work enymore User:Korppufin/sig

Neutral

* Getting better but not quite. User:Darth henry/Sig 22:10, February 19, 2013 (UTC)

  • I think he's a fine user and a really nice one.. but I don't feel like he is ready for this. I'm not going to oppose, so neutrality is where I'll stand. 'Nuff said. User:1999bug/sig1 02:52, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
  • Per Bug, mainly. I would kind of like to see some experience in dealing with trouble-makers with a lack of rights first. After that, I'd definitely support. :) User:BrickfilmNut/sig
    • @BFN I have there are pics on Legodude101's wiki as I did catch a sockpuppet without having any rights.. He did tell me it was him though :


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Soupperson1

Soupperson1 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (14,954 edits, 8,475 mainspace)

I think I could be a good chatmod. Chat's somtimes empty with no chatmods and alot of users(I'm usally one of them). I'm on chat all the time I can be, which is alot espically on weekends. I respect the rules and only broke them once (it was only a sentence in caps lock though, and I stopped when I was told). I have seen trolls (and other rude people) alot on other wiki's and know how to deal with them. I have helpt users before, they were small but every little helps. I have pings so if someone needs me they can just type soup. If I am away, I go away after not typing in 5 minutes it dosn't mean I'm not looking at chat. So feel free to vote either way, love to hear your opinion Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg 11:29, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. Sure ~ CJC 11:33, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I don't see why not. User:Irnakk/sig
  3. Definitely! I'm sure the powers would be put to good use in Soup's control.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 18:02, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per Jeyo. User:Legoboy9373/sig 18:13, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Sure. User:Darth henry/Sig 19:09, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Definitely. One of the most sensible users on Chat. User:Cligra/Sig
  4. Per Cligra. Berrybrick 19:18, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per All. Thinking with Bricks! 23:11, March 3, 2013 (UTC)NuffSaid1995
  6. Per everyone. User:BrickfilmNut/sig

Neutral

Oppose

Comments


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

SuperSpyX

SuperSpyX (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (22 edits, 1,977 mainspace)

From the urgings of several users I have decided to request Chat Mod rights again. I now act more mature and am nicer to new users. (Even Berry said I was doing better.) I have a good understanding of the new chat rules and would use them well. I am on chat quite a bit, (though a little less recently) sometimes when no mods are 44on. I hope you will consider my request and leave feedback and advice below.

User:SuperSpyX/Sig3 22:54, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Support

# NovaHawk 23:04, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Struck. Thought it was a no-brainer, but reading below, there may have been issues in the past. Not being in chat, I can't really judge whether the issues are relevant or not, so neutral. NovaHawk 06:14, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
  1. Sure Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:54, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
  2. What is the worse that can happen? ~ CJC 20:23, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
  3. If the above three have read all below and support, then I might as well. User:LazerzSoH/signature
  4. ^ klagoer 23:50, February 22, 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

  • You have been doing better, but I am not willing to support yet. That Aussie-stereotype episode was not long ago enough for me, aside from a few other things that I am not sure have changed, but no need to go into detail again. Berrybrick 23:28, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks...I guess. User:SuperSpyX/Sig3
      • It's not worth me getting angry over, but this is one of those "things". Berrybrick 00:01, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
        • I didn't mean that in a mean way. I'm sorry if you took it that way.
  • He has been better lately, but I haven't seen him on chat enough to be sure either way. I'm leaning toward support, though.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 02:04, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

  • Per Jeyo. User:Legoboy9373/sig 08:25, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
  • Pretty much per Jeyo. I really haven't been on enough to know if he's been doing well enough. Drewlzoo
  • He was sexist once or twice to my friend recentley, if he stops i'll support, or if it was just a one time kinda thing Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
  • Per Jeyo. User:Irnakk/sig
  • Neutral. He seems to generally be behaving fine, but I am not familiar with the events that the others are referencing, and therefore don't want to take a stance either way. User:BrickfilmNut/sig
  • Going neutral, his been alright recently but I just can't seem to get myself to oppose or to support. Sorry SSX, but per Jeyo (And I'm NOT happy about the Aussie-stereotype video BerryBrick said above). -User:Power Jim/sigcode 07:09, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Not a very good history - has been banned twice in the last 6 months for being racist, and has a bad habit of being a show-off, and is not very mature, especially not enough for this role. --User:CzechMate/czech 01:17, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
    Have you been on chat with him recently? He's been quite a bit better.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 01:21, February 9, 2013 (UTC)

  1. I have, and I see no major differences. --User:CzechMate/czech 01:24, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
    Fair enough.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:17, February 9, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per Czech, BB, and Soup. User:Cligra/Sig
  2. He's shown signs of racism, sexism and likes to show off. The rest of this oppose has been rethought and revoked, though the rest still stands. User:1999bug/sig1 19:09, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
  3. I think Spy isn't the worst, but he doesn't need mod rights. He's rarely on chat, he is definitely a show-off, and has been racist. So basically, per everyone. If I am still not ready for rights yet, he isn't either. User:Awesomeknight1234/SigbyCP
  4. Per everyone. --LEGO2013Helper (talk) 17:36, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per everyone Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg

Comments

  • RFC ~ CJC 23:15, March 1, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful (due to use of sockpuppet to support)

Cap.America

Cap.America (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I have been a member on Wikia for awhile. I meet all requirements of the guide. I would like to defend chat from wrong doers on the web. I have handeled them decently by telling them to stop. This does nothing at all. I would like to protect chat and NOT just have moderator rights. I love wiki, and I think it should have a few more guardians. Cap.America (talk) 16:29, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Support

  1. From my opinion, user has clear expierence with chat and deserves rights. klagoer 17:14, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Cap. is a good, dedicated user who has the experience, enthusiasm, and maturity required. User:BrickfilmNut/sig
  3. Per above. --Irnakk
  4. Per all. User:Darth henry/Sig 18:08, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Per Klagoer, as long as you move with us. :P Berrybrick 21:29, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Per all and hes nice too Soupperson1 Friends are Forever! <3Friends girls.jpg
  7. Well as he told me in chat he tells spammers to stop and I saw he has done a lot of page edits.User:Hunterkiller1440/sig

# Per everyone. ~BriBricks2000 (User is sockpuppet of Cap.America)

Neutral

  • Not sure. ~ CJC 21:30, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. He isn't on chat very much as far as I can tell, and I haven't seen him encounter spammers before. Basically, I don't know him well enough to see how he'd do with the rights. EDIT: He made a sockpuppet to support his nomination. My oppose is no longer a weak one.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:08, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per Jeyo Stated my feelings perfectly. User:LazerzSoH/signature
  2. Per Jeyo, and I don't really feel comfortable about this. Also, he used a sockpuppet to support this, not exactly a mature thing to do. --User:CzechMate/czech 22:30, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Comments


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful (due to block placed on the user's account)

Brikkyy13

Brikkyy13 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (4,760 edits, 2,873 mainspace)

I have been part of this wiki for a few months now, and I am pretty active. I may only have a few mainspace edits, they are generally pretty good. The only edits that have been reverted are on The Mandarin, but that was sorted out. I have recently discovered chat. And though it benefits as a place to socialize, it also benefits as a tool to help users. If made a chat mod, I would make sure that all users who came there looking for help would get the answers they need, as well as making sure it is a safe place. Brikkyy13 (talk) 07:29, February 19, 2013 (UTC)

Support

#As myself.(If I am not allowed to have a say please strike it out) BrikkyyTalk (Nominee cannot vote for self)

Neutral

  • I've never seen you on chat (I don't think) ~ CJC 17:13, February 19, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Look - you're a nice friendly user Brikkyy, but I just have a few things to say: One, your mainspace edits do often need to be reverted, and mainspace has almost nothing to do with chat, two, you still don't really understand the whole of the wiki yet, such as editing the User rights request pages, and leaving "welcome" messages on new user talk pages. You are barely ever on chat, and definitely not ready, nor mature enough for the role, and need a lot more experience and maturity for any kind of right here, and you really do need to read some of the policies here. I would also like you to read some of the chat "rules" here, and read the checklist linked in this page. I really don't want to sound rash here, but these are my general points. --User:CzechMate/czech 07:37, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
    • I didn't realize they were bad edits, and that was 1 user, and I thought it would save some other admins time.

BrikkyyTalk

      • Welcomes are done automatically by a bot ;) And there's nothing wrong with welcoming a new user with the template, provided that they have contributed to the wiki (ie, made at least one edit). (As far as the actual vote goes- neutral due to not being in chat) NovaHawk 07:59, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
        • To be honest, when I joined, I had no clue about it either :P --User:CzechMate/czech 09:19, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Hm. Per Czech, I think. Let's give it some time. User:Cligra/Sig
  3. Per Cligra. User:Legoboy9373/sig 08:47, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Considering your reason for opposition to Nuff's request below, I don't feel like you would make that great of a mod right now. I mean, if you were opposing someone for copying an idea that was hardly original I can't help but wonder what reasons you would use the tools against someone and how little the reason might be. Berrybrick 15:55, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
    I just came across this too. My maturity concerns are increasing, even if you did remove it. Berrybrick 15:59, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Sorry Brikky, but I haven't seen you on chat enough. User:BrickfilmNut/sig
  6. Per Czech. User:Darth henry/Sig 22:18, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
  7. Chat mod is usually a daily, hourly thing.. it isn't exactly for people who are rarely on. User:1999bug/sig1 02:47, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
  8. Per everyone. User:LazerzSoH/signature

Comments

  • Czech did say on his userpage "You can never have enough mods". Don't be a hypocrite...

BrikkyyTalk

    • That isn't necessarily being hypocritical. He doesn't support rabidly like you might expect someone who said that to do, but he is careful in voting. We have gotten people before who seem to think that as chat mod they have gained diplomatic immunity on chat which is not the case. I am not saying you would do that, but it is something we have to keep in mind. Berrybrick 15:51, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
      • I see users with rights not as "better users", but as users with extra features that help keep the wiki up to standard. as for chat mods, I see them as users who not only keep chat safe, but make sure any users who come there for help leave with the info they need. --Brikkyy13 (talk) 07:31, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
        • I think that what Czech meant was true. You can never have enough people who do their jobs well. If we had 100 Berrybricks, Jeyos, Cligras, CJCs, and pretty much every other great mods here, chat would be perfect. But since we don't, we are careful making sure we vote carefully. User:LazerzSoH/signature


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Hi Strike Laser

Hi Strike Laser (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (24 edits, 2 mainspace)

Let's face it: I'm a newb. I am. But I edit roughly 50 a day, and have never been kicked, banned, or even said a single bad thing, whether to a user. Some people don't trust newbs, but let's face it: I'm nice, fun, and definitely not going to yell :) Don't judge a book by its cover :)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. He just joined today, and I honestly don't know him well enough to support... He seemed like he really wanted it, the first day he joined did 100 edits just so he could apply... IDK. Maybe give him longer, then reapply... Klintrin--Talk--Contributions
  2. You joined Bricki less than 48 hours ago. YOu made most of your edits today, usually adding 1 or two words/removing 1 or 2 words to a page. Sorry. Try again in a few months. --LEGO2013Helper (talk) 02:19, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Please reapply later, you literally just joined and we haven't had time to.. "analyze".. you. User:1999bug/sig1 02:21, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Per Bug.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 02:57, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

  1. Per bug, but less creepy. --User:CzechMate/czech 04:38, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Never seen him on chat, since he just joined two days ago. User:Legoboy9373/sig 10:39, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
  3. No idea who this user is. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  4. Per Clone. User:Irnakk/sig2

Comments

He actually didn't meet the required 100 mainspace edits. . . Try reapplying in around 1-3 months, you'll have a better chance then. :) Klintrin--Talk--Contributions

  • Perhaps while I was on an absence I didn't get this memo, but according to thsi page, Brickipedia:User rights/Requests, you don't need to have any edits and you must be on the wiki for at least 10 days. Normally, I would close this but since I am not sure about this is that, opposes don't have anything to do with requirements, and user doesn't even meet requirements. If I could have someone confirm this for me that would be great. klagoer 02:31, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
  • I would close it if I had the time. Berrybrick 02:32, January 2, 2013 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Thorin II Oakenshield (2)

Thorin II Oakenshield (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I am very mature on chat, have made 100+ Mainspace edits, and know what goes on around here (Maybe a little TOO much :P). There is nothing much else to say. So I am going to end it here. Thorin, At your service! 04:23, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. He is on chat a lot, and he has been there without any moderators when there has been a vandal. I think that these rights would be very useful for him. Full Support. –Agent Charge Are you in? 06:11, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • Heck, so have I. And I'm not the only one. --LEGO2013Helper (talk) 18:15, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  1. The fact that he reads the logs makes me feel he is ready for any situation that could appear on chat. Per charge, Full Support User:LazerzSoH/signature
  2. If you aren't trying to hide anything, then him reading the logs is fine User:Darth henry/Sig 16:13, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  3. While what Jeyo said did waver my confidence in my decision a bit, my overall opinion of Thorin being a nice, mature user overweighs that point, so support. And about the chat log things: I don't see how that affects modship in any way. He'll still be reading the logs regardless. Denying him the rights won't do anything to change that. In other words, if you're concerned about him reading the logs, then talk to him about that and don't express your opinion in this way! And if you think the fact that him "stalking" you means that you simply aren't comfortable with him having the rights, I have to ask you, how serious could any power abuses on his part be and, more importantly, HOW ARE THE ABILITIES WE'D BE GRANTING HIM RELATED TO HIM READING THE LOGS?! User:BrickfilmNut/sig
  4. Seems respectable LMFS (talk) 00:39, December 28, 2012 (UTC) (User is sockpuppet of the user requesting)
  5. I have only read this page about him, he seems well liked, made 100 Mainspace edits, and is being more mature then some mods here. This stalker thing is COMPLETELY immature. Lloyd Montgomery Garmadon (talk) 00:42, December 28, 2012 (UTC) (User is a sockpuppet of the user requesting)

Neutral

  1. I don't know. On one hand, he seems mature and has encountered spammers before. But on the other, he seems to want the position of Chat Mod very, very badly, more than most users. When told he had to make 100 mainspace edits before requesting again, he went around making one word edits that, while not bad, weren't that good either. He made the edits solely for the purpose of achieving Chat mod, it seems, as he previously stated that he "probably won't edit the wiki for a long time". There's also something else that makes me uneasy. I don't know what it is and I could be completely wrong, but it's just a gut feeling. So...yeah.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 06:57, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

  • I don't want mod rights THAT bad, but I think I deserve them. If I wanted to have them bad I would probably request them daily. Thorin, At your service! 16:38, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
    And As for the one-word edits, I was fixing the grammar so they would be more understandable, and I edit because I want to, not for Chat-Moderator Desire, if that were the reason, I would have stopped at 100. Thorin, At your service! 16:48, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
    That is a good point (the fact that he didn't stop). User:BrickfilmNut/sig
    As for what I stated earlier, the not editing thing, I saw LOTS of pages that needed some editing, and decided to edit. I also said Probably. Thorin, At your service! 00:36, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
    If all Thorin wants to do on Brickipedia is go on chat, what is the problem with that? He went and made the 100 edits, and didn't just stop, showing that he does want them, and is willing to do work for them. Yes, some of his edits may not have been all that helpful, but how can you expect him to make perfect edits all along. After first joining, I was a sort of vandal (Although at the time I didn't know what what I was doing was bad), but now, a few years later, I'm an admin. Maybe later Thorin will be one of the main Brickipedians on the wiki. Who but God knows? I think that is good that he went and made the required edits–he wants the rights. Does it really matter the time that he did that edits in? If I wanted the rights, but didn't have the qualifications, I would probably do the same thing. Wouldn't you? And about reading the chat logs, isn't that what they're there for?????? –Agent Charge Are you in? 00:31, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
    (Check Brickiadmin.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 00:57, December 31, 2012 (UTC))

  1. I'm not sure on how to conflict and cross my previous support but Per Jeyo. If anyone can help show me the special thing that does that, please do. I'd like to talk to this user more.User:LazerzSoH/signature
    Striked for you. ~ CJC 18:23, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Neutral. ~ CJC 18:23, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I already feel stalked when he reads every log of chat, which he says he's reading them all the time. For a MODERATOR to read the log every day, that just freaks the crap out of me. User:Awesomeknight1234/SigbyCP(Vote struck, see comments)
    Why should it? There isn't anything wrong with it, technically.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 04:28, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

  1. Yes, he can read them, but for him to shout it out loud is kind of making me feel stalked. User:Awesomeknight1234/SigbyCP
    So a non-mod can read the logs every day, but as soon as they become a moderator, that is just wrong. ~ CJC 11:30, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
    No, he can read it, but he doesn't need to shout it out loud in chat. User:Awesomeknight1234/SigbyCP
    I don't "Shout it out loud in chat". Thorin, At your service! 16:53, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
    Yes, you do. One day you came and said "Hello! I'm going to read the logs now!". I fell that you came just to say that as you didn't say anything else after that. User:Legoboy9373/sig 10:46, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
  2. I really think the user needs more time here. I know there isn't anything wrong with it - but it is really odd that he reads logs and enjoys them, I just don't like him reading stuff from before he joined. A month or two, and I'd probably support. Per Jeyo, too. --User:CzechMate/czech 06:41, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  3. No. Just no. especially after he stalked me. User:Irnakk/sig2(Vote struck, see comments)
  4. Per Czech. User:Legoboy9373/sig 09:28, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  5. No Because when i see him he is on the Chat for maybe 30 - 60 minutes a day, and most Chat Mods are on 2 - 15 hours a day RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
    • I'm not. It's more like a half hour for me... User:Darth henry/Sig 16:14, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
      If mods really were on 15 hours a day, That would be sad. Thorin, At your service! 16:45, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
      Well not 15, but I stay at least for 1 or 2, and sometimes a lot more. User:Legoboy9373/sig 10:49, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
  6. He seems like a kind of nice user but the way he reads the logs and likes to tell us stuff that he shouldn't even know that he's learnt from reading them makes me think that he's not mature enough to be a chat mod, if he were to read the logs and not be creepy about it I might support. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
    • CGCJ, I do not "Like to post what I read" I did ONE time when I was new. Thorin, At your service! 00:38, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
  7. I might have voted support had I not read Jeyo's neutral vote. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 14:40, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  8. Per Czech and NBP. I don't trust the guy seeing that he WANTS to be a chat mod and reads logs, gives me the creeps, so until it's confirmed that he is an normal guy who is actually a fan and not a stalker, I say nay.-User:Jedi master sith/sig(Vote struck, see comments)
    • I am a LEGO Fan, not a stalker, and if I did not want the rights, why am I running? Why did ANYONE run if they did not want the rights? Thorin, At your service! 17:31, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
      1) I still don't know if you're a stalker or not, liars lie. 2) most of the time people are nominated because the deserve/earned it, not want it.-User:Jedi master sith/sig
  9. Per Czech and Clone. --LEGO2013Helper (talk) 18:16, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  10. Though, I do not know him to well, I will say I don't think a "mature" chat-mod needs to question or make comments when it comes to opposes. I would support but I have read other opposes/neutrals and I think these people have a point (And no I don't care he reads the logs). Also after had reading Jeyo's great input, I will say Oppose. klagoer 01:16, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
  11. Per NBP and Klagoer's first sentence. Berrybrick 00:30, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
  12. He's banned indefinitely for being the sockpuppet of a user who is constantly causing trouble. There is no way that he is getting moderator rights. User:1999bug/sig1 18:16, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • Really, I don't know whether to scold or laugh at this "stalking" business. He was not stalking you. I read the chat logs often as well, actually. Was he asking for your name or personal info? Because that's what I call stalking, not reading the logs and telling everyone about it. File:EyerollEmote.gif

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 07:13, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

  • And even then, I don't tell people what I read. I did one day, but not anymore. Thorin, At your service! 16:52, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm laughing because of how terrible these opposes are. Reading chat logs =/= stalking? You all know that whatever you post on chat will end up in the logs, and that anyone can read them. The fact someone is reading them doesn't make them the one at fault. If you are worried about what he might read in the logs, then be more careful about what you post on chat... ~ CJC 11:29, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
    NBP actually had a good reason to oppose. Thorin, At your service! 16:39, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
    When I wrote this, NBP hadn't opposed... ~ CJC 18:11, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Jeyo and CJC. If he specifically went after you and then asked for personal info, that's stalking. User:LazerzSoH/signature
  • Note - if another admin disagrees, feel free to undo my strikes, but for the record, I've struck the opposes that basicly just say "He reads logs, therefore he is a stalker". Unless you have actual proof for him being a stalker, I fail to see how him reading the chat logs can be considered a valid reason to oppose. ~ CJC 18:23, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

And also -- per DH and CJC. If people are getting freaked out by the fact that he reads the logs, then logic dictates there's a reason. What are people saying on chat that they don't want everyone to know? Just something to think about. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 19:06, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

  • I'm finding his replies to users opposes rather immature, just the way it seems like he's whining or trying to argue a point that's not needing to be argued. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
    It was neither whining or arguing a point, I was just stating what actually happened, some things were either misstated, or misunderstood. Thorin, At your service! 23:35, December 28, 2012 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Thorin II Oakenshield

Thorin II Oakenshield (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I am responsible, mature, know a lot about this wiki and how things go on chat, I am there when some are not. I have dealt with spammers, no mods or admin were there, because we need more. I think I would be great for the job. Thorin, At your service! 04:15, December 11, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  1. I'd LOVE to support you. You're a great guy. I've seen you on chat, and you are responsible and polite, but I just can't, as you don't fit the criteria. You just need those 100 mainspace edits, and then I'll give you 100% support. Again, I'd love to support you, but I just can't. Sorry. –Agent Charge Are you in? 07:54, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per Charge. User:LazerzSoH/signature
  3. Per Charge ~ CJC 16:23, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Almost per Charge, just replace that second-to-last sentence with the second part of Jeyo's first. Berrybrick 19:45, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Per Charge, mostly. User:Cligra/Sig

Oppose

  1. Thorin seems like a decent user, but he hasn't been here long enough. Additionally, he has yet to make a single mainspace edit. I can see him with the rights in the future, but not now.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 05:16, December 11, 2012 (UTC)

  1. No idea who this user is. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  2. Per Clone. I saw him a few times but I barely know him. Last time he was stalking us though.. User:Irnakk/sig2
    He wasn't stalking you. Is there a problem with reading Brickipedia's archives? I've read quite a few myself.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 20:11, December 11, 2012 (UTC)

  1. Same here.--BrickfilmNut (talk) 20:15, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
  2. No, NO EDITS, and was trolling on chat --—TX24 (talk) 22:36, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
    Are you sure that was me? I don't troll. Thorin, At your service! 05:00, December 12, 2012 (UTC)
    Sorry, I meant spamming. --—TX24 (talk) 01:26, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
    I don't spam, either. Thorin, At your service! 01:50, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Sorry to break this to you, but I believe you have to have been a user for at least one month and have made at least 100 edits. :( I'm sure you'd do a great job, but you don't meet the requirements. --50.99.246.31 04:37, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • I think he has been here for at least a month. He knows every single answer to anything I have asked him. He knows who everyone is and all about them. His knowledge seems to extend for about 5 months. User:LazerzSoH/signature
  • Perhaps he was a wikia contributor for that time? Because when I go to his profile, it says, "13 EDITS SINCE JOINING THIS WIKI DECEMBER 9, 2012". :/ BrickfilmNut (talk) 17:39, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • I don't know. He stayed up all night to read practically every forum and fact about every editor on the wiki. User:LazerzSoH/signature
    He's been reading the old chat logs, I personally find that a bit creepy as I'd rather have him learn stuff from his experiences not the past before he joined. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • (Edit conflict with CGCJ) Wow, he's certainly dedicated. :P I do think he'd do a great job, I just don't know how often users here make exceptions for this kind of thing.--BrickfilmNut (talk) 17:45, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • Never, as rules are rules. 100 mainspace isn't at all hard, though... User:Cligra/Sig


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

TX24

TX24 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I was Conservative Christian Rep, but changed. I just wanna be a mod. I was inspired to do so when I saw all the spammers at late night. I would like to be A mod. Also, I have been on chat 10+ days and have started editing more recently

Thanks, --—TX24 (talk) 20:31, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. Seems like a good user, but he needs to have been here longer. I'd wait for a few months.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 20:34, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

  1. No, definitely not been on here long enough and I don't know the user well enough. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  2. Too soon. ~ CJC 20:39, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Was kind of rude to me lately. Plus, too new. --LEGO2013Helper (talk) 20:41, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Too new. User:Darth henry/Sig 20:42, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Per all above. Thorin, At your service! 03:40, December 14, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Yes, I agree, I am too new. I will wait a while --—TX24 (talk) 21:05, December 13, 2012 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

LEGO2013Helper

It's been a while, and I think I've got the responsibility. I've been acting nicely lately, and I've seen some of the rules have changed, and they look a lot easier. I can handle it. It's not like I'm running for admin. If I have to, I can wait another few weeks. LEGO2013Helper (talk) 03:02, November 15, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. No. CM4S, no. You're lucky to still be here, you could have easily been blocked again. Not mature enough, langauge, and he has been banned 14 times prior. --User:CzechMate/czech 03:05, November 15, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per Czech.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 03:06, November 15, 2012 (UTC)

  1. Per Czech. User:1999bug/sig1 03:11, November 15, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Yeah, that's happening. As I've already said everything on this subject that I care to, I'll just copypaste my comments from July:
    Really? Again? The user has always been immature, acerbic, depressive, and frequently just downright rude and annoying. Admittedly, I haven't spoken to him much recently, but the two times I have he has been quite unpleasant. Also, I hate to bring this up again, but he was "permanently" banned from Chat just a few months ago, and was banned, what, thirteen times before that? As a side note, do we really want as a Chat Moderator someone who is so narrow-minded that they defend their tastes in My Little Pony when someone even implies that they don't like the show, but can't begin to comprehend why someone might like Friends, to the extent of being actively rude to them if they, say, create a News Blog about the theme? User:Cligra/Sig
  3. The IP does sum it up pretty well. Anyway, I'd describe CM4S' behavior like this: When he is good, good for him. When he is bad, bad for us all. Berrybrick 11:28, November 15, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Don't get me wrong, I like CM4S. But I've also seen how he's acted in the past in chat. Honestly, I think he's lucky to even be allowed in chat after some of those incidents. NovaHawk 11:34, November 15, 2012 (UTC)
  5. I think we can all say that CM4S has improved. That's great! But CM4S, wait at least a few more months. If you are continually good, then my opinion might change to a support. I'm really happy with how you have acted lately. Keep it up! User:LazerzSoH/signature
  6. Per Czech. And I just realized that he's CM4S... User:Legoboy9373/sig 15:45, November 15, 2012 (UTC)
  7. Per others, really nice user, just can't trust with rights. On a side note I did not know this was CM4S's new name :p --Brick bobby talk it's a trap! 17:03, November 15, 2012 (UTC)
  8. Per Czech. User:Irnakk/sig2
  9. Per Legoboy9373 User:Legodude101/sig
    # Nope. User:Combo Breaker/sig (Please provide a reason when opposing nominations)
    Reason? --LEGO2013Helper (talk) 04:48, November 16, 2012 (UTC)
    Only admins can strike votes... --User:CzechMate/czech 04:52, November 16, 2012 (UTC)
    Struck. Everyone happy now? ;) NovaHawk 04:55, November 16, 2012 (UTC)
  10. No, definitely the last person I'd ever want as a mod. Sure he's been good but it's only a matter of time before he loses it and is permanently banned again, it's happened too many times. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  11. Per LazerzSoH User:Lloyd Montgomery Garmadon/sig

Comments

  • Wow. People sure are going on about this CM4S. When I encountered CM4S, there were not problems with him. Although he once kicked me for talking to much about Adventure Time >.>. Or was that DH? Oh well :P. Point is, I think people are being a bit too harsh. User:Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000/Sig
    • I never really saw CM4S at his worst, but from what I'm gathering, everyone held your opinion at one point or another, gave him another chance, and then...well, here we are. They don't seem to want to repeat the same mistake.--50.99.240.54 06:02, November 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • He's CM4S? Just noticed, I did... does anyone has any evidence about that? Just asking, really... User:Omega X.23/sig

I'm thinking of SNOW closing this nomination. True, it's only been a few days, but just about everyone who normally votes on these things has already placed their views here. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  • Closed - WP:SNOW ~ CJC 16:29, November 20, 2012 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000

Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (6 edits, 0 mainspace)

I think I should become a Chat Mod because I have experienced four spammers over the months, and I have been on chat every single day since I joined, except one. 2000 - The futuristic sound of Balloon Music (talk) 08:40, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. This user is very mature and friendly. He also is on when most mods and admins are not,and on those times,spammers come to spam on chat. Full support! User:Irnakk/sig2
  2. I honestly can trust 2000 with this, and there are always others to help him out. --User:CzechMate/czech 09:01, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
  3. I was actually about to ask to nominate this user for chatmod. I think 2000 has developed a lot recently both in maturity and skills on chat. This here is a very friendly and trustworthy user. :) -User:Power Jim/sigcode 09:46, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
  4. I think he would do an amazing job. Per Jim. :) User:Darth henry/Sig 14:15, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
  5. I'm going to trust everyone on this. User:LazerzSoH/signature
  6. Yes, he's definitely mature and experienced enough for the job. He's also on chat at a time when most others are not.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 22:13, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

  1. He think he should. He's really nice. DIN0
  2. He Deserves the rights. He is nice and mature! Lloyd Montgomery Garmadon (talk) 06:27, November 14, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Can't say much. Sure he has been on chat a bit, but never paid attention. ~ CJC 20:47, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per CJC. User:Legoboy9373/sig 17:42, November 5, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Maturity concerns and not sure if the user needs the rights. Clone gunner commander jedi talk

Comments


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Withdrawn

Bob Bricks

Bob Bricks (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

Hello, i'm Bob Bricks! Many of you know me, i'm asking to request these rights because I think that i'm more mature than before, thanks! Template:W:BobSig/2012- 19:49, November 1, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  • You always were very decent to people on chat, you were a great help. But what you did was wrong, and to be sure you are mature, I'd say wait. User:LazerzSoH/signature

Oppose

  1. I've seen nothing to make me think that he wouldn't do what he did again. Besides, it was only about a month ago, so I think it is too soon. (I do have a bad sense of timing though. :P) Berrybrick 19:51, November 1, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Far too soon and I am yet to see that he's "matured" Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  3. Per Berrybrick and Clone gunner commander jedi. User:Irnakk/sig
  4. Not mature enough, and I am not impressed with this user. --User:CzechMate/czech 21:52, November 1, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Per Czech. User:Legoboy9373/sig 07:53, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Comments


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Not done

Awesomeknight1234

Awesomeknight1234 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

Before any of you oppose, I hope you read this instead of coming up with an insignificant reason for doing so. Awesomeknight is a great friend and user who was one of our better mods when he had the rights. I'm sure some of you are confused as to why he had the rights removed, but honestly, it wasn't as big of a deal as it seemed. But I might as well explain why Knight had these rights removed, to keep this nomination legitimate.

  • A user (Whom I will be keeping anonymous, just in case.) was causing havoc and angering various users, which included Knight. Even I was being bothered by this user, on occasion. Although it continued, there wasn't much we could do as he wasn't personally attacking anyone directly or anything else ban-worthy. This was very confusing to us and it never ceased, simply dragging on.
  • Knight, not realizing the jeopardy it would cause, spammed the user's wiki with hate messages. Admittedly, he told me and I never even considered the risk he was taking. I don't wish to be blamed, but do take in account that he told multiple people who could have easily stopped him. I would also like to point out that this message is known as "The World's Worst Insult" (Not as bad as it sounds.) a well-known internet meme, not something he came up with to directly insult the user.
  • Although we are not supposed to take into account of users' actions on other wikis, the administrators thought this threat was a little much and somewhat ridiculous. I'm not trying to say their judgement was wrong, but maybe it would be better if it remains temporary and we let Knight regain his user rights.

So, if you think Knight deserves these rights, go ahead and support. If you don't, feel absolutely free to oppose. Or just stay neutral. Whichever way you choose, please consider the above. As far as I know, I didn't leave out any major details that could change your decision.

Knight supports this, but I am the one who is "nominating" him. If anything, don't shoot this down because you think he wanted me to do it. </textwall> User:1999bug/sig1 22:28, October 27, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator. User:1999bug/sig1 22:28, October 27, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Knight may have strong opinions as stated below, but I think he's working on that and in time, he might overcome it. When he spammed the other wiki, I really don't think he'd do it again. I feel personally that he needs to mature a little more before he receives the rights after hearing everyone's opinion.
  • I also want to add that Knight has done a lot of good on this wiki, overall :). After another few months, I will see about how he has matured. User:LazerzSoH/signature

Oppose

  1. I don't care if it was a meme or what it was. It was nasty. Also, we try to stop spam, not promote it. User:Darth henry/Sig 22:48, October 27, 2012 (UTC)
  2. I am pretty sure I know who you are talking about, and I had half a mind to block him for lying about certain things, but what Knight did was still wrong. Per Henry about the meme. Yes, you are right that what happens on one wiki is not supposed to effect what happens on another, but vandalism is vandalism anywhere and it shows that when a person doesn't feel like they are being watched, they are perfectly fine with breaking rules. They should not be blocked here for it, but it makes it harder to trust them. Berrybrick 22:56, October 27, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Well, here's the thing. You've brought up, and (almost) justified one of the two reasons everyone has opposed him before. However, you've completely ignored the second, which is, to the best of my knowledge, still relevant. I will lay it down thus: Knight has strong opinions. There's nothing wrong with this. The problem, however, arises whenever anybody happens to talk about something he doesn't like for one reason or another. (the two main offenders being "Kingdumbs" and "Minecrap".) While Knight is perfectly amicable most of the time, it is impossible for him to let other people's views on the subjects he dislikes (that is, the fact that other actually like them) lie unchallenged, and he will get into long and pointless arguments on the subject. For an example, see this blog. Incidentally, this other blog was posted relatively recently, but, to the best of my knowledge, he hasn't really stopped this habit much, although he does usually manage to be quiet when people speak on Chat. Still, is somebody who finds it "hard for me not to insult them while the conversation is going" somebody we want with the ability to ban people at will, even if he has developed the maturity to admit it?
Also, it is worth noting that, when Knight had ChatMod powers before, he was involved in the great "Let's ban the Chatlog Bot" plot that led to the bot gaining chatmod rights to prevent banning. I don't actually really remember much about the incident, but it is worth note. User:Cligra/Sig
  1. Per everyone above, I don't see him being tolerant enough to be acceptable to have the right. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  2. PA. ~ CJC 23:15, October 27, 2012 (UTC)
  3. You've brought up some of the bad parts of Knight in those statements, and remember - bombs are a real threat in modern society. The amount of times he'll do something immature is high, and the blogs about Kingdoms, and other stuff he doesn't like. I'd like a mod to be more tolerant of things, or statements they disagree on. His strong opinions are known to hurt feelings - face it: The world doesn't revolve around you and your opinions. He's vandalised a wiki, sure, maybe not a big one, but is was for revenge, which cannot be tolerated. And Cligra's statement about the "ban the chat bot" is bad too, the bot just logs chat. Being blocked for that PA against CJC, too. I just cannot support this request. --User:CzechMate/czech 00:39, October 28, 2012 (UTC)
Okay, the only offense I was aware of was the one I covered above. If anything, this should be ended now, as I had no clue about the PA towards CJC or the other issues. And yes, Knight does has very biased opinions, but hating on certain subjects (Such as Kingdoms) isn't a very relevant point toward the opposition of this appeal, though subject to controversy. The people who let the arguments go on are just as relentless when it comes to their side. Like I said above, I was very unaware of most of these offenses and don't want to drag this on further. Please, by all means, close this. User:1999bug/sig1 18:16, October 28, 2012 (UTC)
  1. Per everyone. User:Irnakk/sig2 --Long Live The Ewoks! (the caps sound cool in that way :P )

Comments

  • This is beyond embarrassing, as I had no idea about a lot of this stuff. User:1999bug/sig1 18:37, October 28, 2012 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Not done

IMFAgent1

IMFAgent1 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I would like to become a chat mod because I have been on Brickipedia for a while now and I see how chat works. Also, I think I have matured more and I think I am ready for the rights. IMFAgent1 20:34, September 2, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  1. I don't see you on chat much. Clone gunner commander jedi talk

# Per Clone. User:Legoboy9373/sig 17:30, September 4, 2012 (UTC) (Moved to Oppose)

Oppose

  1. For one thing I spent ten minutes of my life fixing this page because of his signature, but I aslo don't feel he is mature enough yet for these rights. klagoer 22:45, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Not on enough, lack of experience as a chat mod, and not mature enough. --User:CzechMate/czech 04:14, September 5, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Per Czech. User:Legoboy9373/sig 13:00, September 5, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Per Czech. User:Irnakk/sig2
  5. I know Mainspaces don't have anything to do with becoming a mod, but... 99. And I've never seen you on chat before, and I've been on for every day since I joined Brickipedia. User:Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000/Sig
  6. I would support you, but you're not that active these days. User:LEGOSpinjitzu/Sig
  7. PA. ~ CJC 10:49, September 15, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

*I know Mainspaces don't have anything to do with becoming a mod, but... 99. And I've never seen you on chat before, and I've been on for 1 month, 8 days straight. User:Adventuretimesbiggestfan2000/Sig (Moved to oppose)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was SNOW close

Finnfan99

Finnfan99 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

i want to become chat mod because i wont abuse the power of the chat mod and ill help others

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. Maturity concerns and he has no need for the rights. He has also recently been banned from chat for acting up.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. Per Jeyo, and I personally have never seen him on chat before today. User:Munchman14/sig
  2. Per Jeyo. ~ CJC 23:17, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Maturity concerns, and like Jeyo said, no need for them. --User:CzechMate/czech 23:24, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  4. I'm on chat with him right now. Per Jeyo. >_> Berrybrick 23:42, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  5. I'm really gonna oppose this. He's very immature, and he was rude to a lot of users on a majority of wikis he's been on. I'm sure he doesn't need any rights right now. :/ --Prototron (talk) 00:06, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Per Jeyo and BB. User:Darth henry/Sig 00:12, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  7. I've never seen him in either the recent activity or the chat. User:Dataman1/Sig 2 01:11, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  8. I oppose, I'm not too trustworthy of him yet. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 12:30, August 9, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • This request got three opposes within the first 10 minutes of it's introduction. :/

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  • He doesn't have the required 100 edits. User:Dataman1/Sig 2 15:07, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • SNOW closed. ~ CJC 15:26, August 9, 2012 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was success, per CJC in comments

Dataman1

Dataman1 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I'm requesting these rights because I think I can help with chat. I've seen pretty much everything there is to see on the chat, from spamming to swearing. I've been kicked for being disruptive and banned for being rude, but I will do my best to help on chat. I will do my best not to abuse these rights. Please consider my request. User:Dataman1/Sig 2 16:57, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. I've seen him on a lot, and he seems mature enough. --Munchman14 16:58, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  2. I'm supporting. :) User:Legoboy9373/sig 17:37, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Improved a lot recently :) ~ CJC 21:20, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  4. I wouldn't mind him as a mod, but he's just got to remember that if he does get it, to be very mature. --User:CzechMate/czech 23:23, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  5. He deserves it. klagoer 16:36, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Yes.User:Sonofhades101/signature 22:07, August 16, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101
  7. Definitely! Great user and great on chat! Very responsible and well mannered! Creeper S (talk) 23:11, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  8. I have been on 1 chat with him but, his attitude showed that he is ready to be a mod.User:IMFAgent1/sig 3

Neutral

  1. Seems like a nice user, but I don't know him well enough.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 16:59, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

  1. He hasn't done it too recently, but I don't appreciate the comments I've seen him make about CJC to new users. Berrybrick 17:38, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  2. I really don't know.. I don't see him on enough. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  3. Per LSC and Jeyo, just simply don't know him that well. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 12:31, August 9, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I gotta admit, I didn't do my research. Looks like he's been banned and warned about attacking other users. I just don't think we should reward this kind of behavior. In time if he proves himself, possibly, but for now I must oppose.--Munchman14 18:04, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Same here! I just saw what he did... Sorry, man! User:Legoboy9373/sig 18:08, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  3. A bit of a hothead. User:Darth henry/Sig 17:46, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

#Per Munch -Template:W:BobSig/2012- (Administrator struck: Reason: user does not meet the editing requirements to vote)

  1. I would not be able to trust him with the right, also he came on earlier and immediately started an argument. Clone gunner commander jedi talk

Comments

  • As Berrybrick said above, I have made rude comments about CJC to newbies. I don't deny it. I regret doing it in the first place. User:Dataman1/Sig 2 17:50, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Request for Closure ~ CJC 21:23, August 25, 2012 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was success

Stormbringer Empire791

Stormbringer Empire791 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (95 edits, 325 mainspace)

Storm is alwas on chat and he is very mature. He is a good fellow and never rude. User:Darth henry/Sig 02:00, August 18, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator. User:Darth henry/Sig 02:00, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  2. I full-heartedly support this, such a mature user and he who could use these rights well. Good luck :) --User:CzechMate/czech 02:04, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Per Czech --ComicsRus (talk) 05:05, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Per above LMFS (talk) 04:07, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Holy canoly yes! :D User:Irnakk/sig2
  6. klagoer 13:50, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  7. I'm surprised that he's not a mod already. User:Dataman1/Sig 2 15:23, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  8. Per Darth's reason for nominating. He has also matured a lot recently.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. Would make a great Chat Mod. Creeper S (talk) 23:15, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Friendly, mature, and always on a lot. Deserves this. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  3. Per Dataman. Berrybrick 17:32, August 19, 2012 (UTC)
  4. I support him all the way.User:IMFAgent1/sig 3

Neutral

  1. I have conflicting opinions on this. On one hand, he's been here a long time and seems trustworthy, but on the other, I don't think he's quite ready for the rights.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. I've seen him only twice on chat and I don't really know what to say. User:Legoboy9373/sig

Oppose

  1. I know that this will mean nothing but, Tbh I don't think he's anywhere near ready for the rights. Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  2. Per Jeyo, except something is telling me to put it here instead. ~ CJC 19:02, August 25, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Accepted though PM. User:Darth henry/Sig 02:00, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • ive known him for a long time and i trust him User:Finnfan99/Sig
  • Needs to be archived as Henry has given him the rights but not closed this. ~ CJC 21:23, August 25, 2012 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was success

Legoboy9373

Legoboy9373 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I want to be a chat moderator, because I think I can be helpful, also I think I have good grammar and I'm on chat a lot of time during the day. If you think so please support me. Thank you for your time! :) User:Legoboy9373/sig

Support

  1. Yes. User:Irnakk/sig2
  2. You could use these rights. User:Dataman1/Sig 2 16:50, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Very mature user, and I know this guy well from his chat talks, definite support --User:CzechMate/czech 23:20, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Mature user, just found out we're in severely different timezones, as me being on 2:30 AM while it's morning for him. Also Per CP. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  5. I dont know you that well or enything but i think you can do it so i will support you User:Korppufin/sig 16:51, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Very mature and ready for the responsibility. User:Darth henry/Sig 00:11, August 17, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Partly per Munchman, but what it boils down to for me being neutral is that I don't recall seeing you on chat. Berrybrick 16:55, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Actually, I was mistaking this user for another with the immaturaty. Seems nice, but I don't see him on all that much. If others want him to be a CM, I would have no problem with it. --Munchman14 18:16, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • I don't recall you on chat much. (But maybe I'm not just looking hard enough). ~ CJC 21:19, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • ^ klagoer 16:37, August 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Though I am usually on chat pretty late and I have seen him before, I'm not sure if he needs the userrights yet, we have so many moderators already. I'm only staying in neutral territory because we could use more mods around that time. User:1999bug/sig1 19:50, August 10, 2012 (UTC)

*^ Per all above ^ -Template:W:BobSig/2012- (Struck by an administrator: Does not meet minumum edit count in mainspace.)

*Per Bug. Clone gunner commander jedi talk (Vote changed to oppose)

Oppose

#Eh, not too sure. Seems immature, never seen the user on chat, and seems to not know about how the wiki operates (Spam warnings, etc.). All in all, if I see the user on chat more and given greater experience, I would support, but for now, I must oppose. --Munchman14 16:52, August 8, 2012 (UTC)

  1. I've observed that he can scorn or admonish other users' altercations without trying to resolve the problem.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 16:58, August 8, 2012 (UTC) #Per Jeyo. User:Darth henry/Sig 18:21, August 8, 2012 (UTC) #Per Jeyo. I don't see him on often. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig

  1. Per Jeyo. Clone gunner commander jedi talk

Comments

  • Big thanks to those who supported me, and Munchman and Jeyo, you live in the USA and I live in Europe (Bulgaria) which is 12 hours difference, so you can't blame me for not being on chat in your day. It's evening here in Bulgaria now and it's morning in most of the states in the USA. I'm on chat about 4 out of 12 hours. So please ask someone else who lives in Europe. And if I become a Chat Moderator I'll stay more time on chat and be helpful. :) User:Legoboy9373/sig
  • Request for Closure ~ CJC 21:23, August 25, 2012 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was not done

CM4S

CM4S (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

CM4S is respected by (most) users, he's kind and tolerant to new users when some individuals are not. He has had Chat Mod rights in the past and he used them well; I believe it was merely an unfortunate incident which caused the removal. A handful of users I know want to see them re-instated.From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 19:07, August 7, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. As Nominator --From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 19:07, August 7, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

  1. Per Cligra last time. But really, he is overly dramatic and hasn't changed much. He was personally attacking CzechMate, again, just Sunday. Berrybrick 19:08, August 7, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per above. User:Dataman1/Sig 2 19:12, August 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Munchman14

Munchman14 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (0 edits, 2 mainspace)

I have been on this wiki for a while and used to have CM rights but left unexpectedly and lost them. I am currently a Patroller and Rollback and am just looking to get them back since I'm back for good and have more time on my hands. I use chat frequently and do occasionally notice people posting links to inappropriate websites. Thank you for your time. Munchman14Dino Attack 01:26, July 26, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Munchman is a user I knew back in my Crazed Penguin era, and is still one of the best users on this site, I'd fully trust him with chat mod again. --User:CzechMate/czech 05:29, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Great user. More mature then some of our current mods... User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 14:25, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Per Czech and Mr. M. User:Darth henry/Sig 01:21, July 27, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Yeah, just be on chat lots. :-) User:Ajraddatz/sig 06:38, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
  5. He is definitely mature and fair enough.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. Very mature, just per ajr, be on chat a lot :) User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  2. Support. 1 question, how did Czech go from Crazed Penguin to Czech Mate?User:Sonofhades101/signature 20:26, July 31, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101

Neutral

  1. Seems like a nice user, but I don't know him well enough yet.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. Per Jeyo, I don't usually see him on.... User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  2. Never seen the ser on chat. User:Irnakk/sig
    Correction: user User:Wertys761/sig
    Typo. :P User:Irnakk/sig
  3. Per Jeyo -Template:W:BobSig/2012-
  4. Per Mr. Minifigure, but he only just got back from being inactive for nearly a year. I just think that he should wait a couple of weeks. Berrybrick 14:42, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Per Berry. He will get definite support from me in a week or two. :D User:Wertys761/sig
  6. I have no idea who this users is, only seen them on chat once.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  7. Per CGCJ LMFS (talk) 18:50, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
  8. Everything I've seen of the user makes me want to support him, but I've never actually met him. User:Drew1200/Sigifier
  9. Per Drewlzoo. User:IMFAgent1/sig 4

Oppose

Comments

*Ok, I withdraw my current nomination until a couple weeks. Thank you for your consideration.--Munchman14Dino Attack 20:46, July 26, 2012 (UTC)

  • I wouldn't. At the rate your going, you should get modship in a few days, maybe a week.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  • Ok, whatever you say. I'll still stay nominated. --Munchman14Dino Attack 01:05, July 27, 2012 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Not Done

CM4S

CM4S (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

Well.. I've been back for a while. I've been doing well on chat (people have told me) and.. yeah. Recently, there have a been a lot of mishaps on chat, and no mods have been there, we keep shouting and they don't do anything. I really can't think of anything else to say, but.. :) CM4S (talk) 16:53, July 31, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Very mature and nice user perfect for chat mod rights -Template:W:BobSig/2012-

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. Please give a reason (preferably a valid one). Berrybrick 17:05, July 31, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. User can be mature at times, but often has a problem with caps.... Sorry. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig

Oppose

  1. Sorry, but even though you have been good, if the past is anything to go by you'll keep it up for a while and then have (an) episode(s). I just can't fully trust you with your history. Berrybrick 17:04, July 31, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Really? Again? The user has always been immature, acerbic, depressive, and frequently just downright rude and annoying. Admittedly, I haven't spoken to him much recently, but the two times I have he has been quite unpleasant. Also, I hate to bring this up again, but he was "permanently" banned from Chat just a few months ago, and was banned, what, thirteen times before that? As a side note, do we really want as a Chat Moderator someone who is so narrow-minded that they defend their tastes in My Little Pony when someone even implies that they don't like the show, but can't begin to comprehend why someone might like Friends, to the extent of being actively rude to them if they, say, create a News Blog about the theme? User:Cligra/Sig

Comments


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Not Done

Legofan100

Legofan100 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

Support

  1. great user very mature. Template:W:BobSig/2012-

Neutral

Oppose

  1. Hardly ever on chat and not too sure about there maturity.Clone gunner commander jedi talk

Comments

  • Closing. >_> Berrybrick 15:07, July 29, 2012 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Legoisawesome

Legoisawesome (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

hi I'm Legoisawesome i want to be chat mod cause there can be ruckas at like 3 in the morning and i always try to stop the arguments in the day which usually stop and this is the reason i want to be a chat mod . Legoisawesome (talk) 03:12, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

#User has potential in the future, but am unsure on maturity. He appears to be active on chat, however. Doesn't have much experience. I will stay in the middle. If he requests in a few months, I will easily change my mind. User:Wertys761/sig

Oppose

  1. v Per Czech

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. Nowhere near mature enough, have serious problems with this users ability to interact with others. And please stop requesting rights when you've just joined. :S --User:CzechMate/czech 05:19, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per all. Sorry. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  3. Per above
  4. Been here less than a week? ~ CJC 13:52, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Change of vote. Sorry but... I did not realize the lack of time he's been here. And, I have noticed much lack in maturity. Sorry. User:Wertys761/sig
  6. Per all. User:Irnakk/sig
  7. When the Vorenus incident occured, you didn't seem very mature. I am not so sure maybe try again later. Per all. User:Sonofhades101/signature 18:07, July 24, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101
  8. I read over logs, shows your not mature enough. -Template:W:BobSig/2012-
  9. Per above. --Munchman14Dino Attack 02:31, July 27, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Request for closure? 9 opposes and no supports in a short amount of time really says a lot to me. Berrybrick 14:55, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
Agreed. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
Yes,please. :P User:Irnakk/sig


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Withdrawal

LMFS

LMFS (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I am nice. I am mature. I would understand if you opposed. But I will not be held back from being a Brickipedian. LMFS (talk) 05:27, July 28, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

  1. I wasn't there when he was last banned,but I'm not really sure. He can be nice sometimes, but I think he needs to wait a couple more weeks. User:Irnakk/sig

Oppose

  1. Not mature enough, banned from chat far too many times, and requested rights too many times. --User:CzechMate/czech 05:47, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per Czech, definitely no mature enough.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  3. --From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 15:43, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Not mature, and has been banned from chat very recently. --Munchman14 16:52, July 28, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • I have to agree, Czech. I was banned from chat a few times. I ran too many times. But now, I am turning over a new leaf. LMFS (talk) 05:49, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
  • Time will tell. You have to prove it. We can't just take your word for it. Berrybrick 15:17, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
  • Ya, only time will tell if you really are turning over a new leaf. Just wait a few weeks and who knows, you may get ChatMod rights afterall.
  • Thank you for your advice! I am turning over a new brick, but I DO feel I need to wait. I will grow mature. Thanks you all! (Now can someone please remove my request?) LMFS (talk) 18:36, July 28, 2012 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Wertys761 (3)

Wertys761 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I tried in the past, it failed. I tried again recently, it was closed due to canvassing. And now, I'd like a third go. :D Third times a charm.

I feel I am responsible and ready for these rights.

Support

  1. Of course. He is mature, friendly and could use the rights.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. User:Irnakk/sig
  2. Per Jeyo -Template:W:BobSig/2012-
  3. Mature, and has what it needs to take. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 02:09, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Definite Support from me, mature user and could use the rights. --User:CzechMate/czech 02:14, July 21, 2012 (UTC)
  5. I can't come up with a good support statement, so basically I just trust him. :P User:Drew1200/Sigifier
  6. Mature, friendly user, and on a lot. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  7. Acctually, after seeing how good he is in chat properly --Brick bobby talk it's a trap! 07:06, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

#maturity concerns (highlighted by the canvassing) and I don't see how he would needed the rights --Brick bobby talk it's a trap! 14:08, July 22, 2012 (UTC)

Well, then you should know that there was a time when all the mods on chat were doing other things and a spammer came on. Wertys and CM4S could do nothing but try to get the mods to pay attention to chat while this guy did as he pleased. I happened to come on at that moment and stopped him, but the point is that if Werty or CM4S were mods, they could have done something. Another thing: When Wertys is on chat, he's on chat. some people come onto chat and then ignore it mostly. That's one of the reasons I supported. He could use the rights.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

Besides canvassing, I think of myself as pretty darn mature. I didn't even know I was canvassing. I was simply telling people: "Either support or oppose" and then I gave them the link to this. I understand that its canvassing now, I've learned from my mistakes, and I'm ready to move on. I find myself pretty mature. But, if you think I'm not, I completely respect that. User:Wertys761/sig
Sorry I don't think you are quite ready, wait month and I will change but you are nearly there --Brick bobby talk it's a trap! 17:29, July 22, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Man... that "canvassing" from last request is really haunting me... lesson learned. 8-)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Not done

Vorenus22

vorenus22/CC-1119 Appo (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (0 edits, 0 mainspace)

Vorenus22 is a great and nice user. he cares for others, he help others in need, many of you may know him. Many of you may think he is "inexperianced", but he's not, and he is my Friend. -βᵒᵇ βʳᶦᶜᵏˢ™ Ʈᵃᶫᵏ · βᶫᵒᵍ

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. *cough*Brickipedia:Requests for Chat Moderator/checklist*cough* User:Cligra/Sig
  • No. You've been here 3 days and made no edits and have generally irritated me on chat. ~ CJC 21:15, July 16, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Cligra. User:Darth henry/Sig 21:17, July 16, 2012 (UTC)
  • God dang edit conflicts! Twice! ALSO, per CJC. User:CM4S/Sig

Comments

Vorenus22 http://lego.wikia.com/wiki/Brickipedia:Requests_for_Chat_Moderator look at the bottom I have been nominate. Plz support it Canvassing. User:Cligra/Sig

I'll close it. I was going to oppose, but I got an edit conflict and wikia messed up the "this is your edit" thing. D: Berrybrick 21:19, July 16, 2012 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Not done

Wertys761 (2)

Wertys761 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I asked a while back in June, and was claimed to not be ready. I have gained popularity, maturity, cheerful attitude =D, and I'm active. I think I'm ready. User:Wertys761/sig

Support

1. He deserves and could totally use the rights. Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  1. I really do appreciate it, Jeyo. :D User:Wertys761/sig
    No problem, Wert :) You deserve it.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge 2. This user has so many reasons to be a mod :

  • Maturity. He has been mature since i first met him.
  • Kind user.
  • Grammar.
  • His epic personality.
  • High level of intilligence. --User:Irnakk/sig
  1. Mature user, definite support, and won't do anything wrong. --User:CzechMate/czech 01:40, July 15, 2012 (UTC)

#i support because i like werty's blog posts -wikan (i hate my sig and don't know how to fix it)

  • Blogs don't have anything to do with chat mod rights... User:Darth henry/Sig 03:36, July 15, 2012 (UTC)

3. I knew him on other websites way before he joined here and I've learned that he is very responsible and mature. User:1999bug/sig1 03:09, July 15, 2012 (UTC)

  1. 4. Mature user, could definitely use the rights. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig

Neutral

Oppose

Comments

Incorrect. I PMed some people to either support or oppose me.
My EXACT words: Please either support or oppose. :D http://lego.wikia.com/wiki/Brickipedia:Requests_for_Chat_Moderator
I don't see any problem with doing that. User:Wertys761/sig
  • Wikan if you don't know how to use a custom sig then put the four tildes (~).

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  • Closing due to canvassing. Berrybrick 13:37, July 16, 2012 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Korppufin

Korppufin (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (0 edits, 90 mainspace)

I can make spammers leave sometimes and im going to promise ill make my behavior chance in chat. Korppufin 19:39, June 17, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. I don't know what he has done wrong he looks like a fine Mod to me. User:Irnakk/sig

Oppose

  1. He has no need for these rights and is not mature enough.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  2. Per CGCJ. User:Admiral Neo/sig
  3. per Clone. User:Sonofhades101/signature
  4. ^^^ --User:CzechMate/czech 22:20, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
  5. ^^^^ Berrybrick 22:45, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Don't know about him, but he said "I'll promise to make my behavior change in chat". Make it change first and show that it will stay changed, and then come back. User:Captain Jag/sig1 04:11, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
  7. He can sometimes be annoying. User:LEGOSpinjitzu/Sig
  8. Per clone. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 22:29, June 28, 2012 (UTC)
  9. Can be immature sometimes, and has no need for the rights. Sorry.User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig

Neutral

  1. I've never seen him on, so meh. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 22:49, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Per Mr. Minifigure, I don't see him on chat much, but he still seems reasonably mature. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 03:51, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

No. For the umpteenth time, nothing on that checklist is mandatory. Berrybrick 22:50, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
Sorrybut I thought it used robe. Nvm then. But when it isn't checked off by the user, I will most likely say no. User:Sonofhades101/signature


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was success

Mat96

Mat96 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

He is on a bunch and doesn't have any issues. He could use the tools well. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 18:28, June 17, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. As nominator. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 18:28, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
  2. He is ready and deserving of these rights. - Orez.
  3. when I come in the morning, guess who I see. Knight, him, and LUWiki. No mods. I think he would be great. User:Sonofhades101/signature
  4. Wouldn't destroy the world. --User:CzechMate/czech 22:20, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Very mature and friendly. User:LEGOSpinjitzu/Sig
  6. Very mature and kind user. :D --User:Makuta Tarkairadan/PSig 14:32, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Mat told me once he didn't want to be a Mod. If his thoughts have changed then I will definitely support.

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  • Nominees are asked if they want to be a chat mod or not, and then the nominator puts the request here. User:LEGOSpinjitzu/Sig

Jeyo Lord VladekTalk The Forge

  • This is very weak oppose, but slightly greater than a neutral. Just some behaviour recently, such as when the person came on chat and said they were a girl, and has since been treated with "suspicion" since ([06:23] <Mat96> Sorry, but I will stay suspicious) ~ CJC 15:36, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per CJC he was calling the user an it and when I told him that she was a girl he said he was suspicious. I talked to him about it in a PM. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig

Neutral

  1. He does seem Pretty cool, But i never see him Talk on the Main Chat RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
  2. Per above. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 19:09, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Sorry,but you can be pretty mad when trolls are on and you got kicked once. User:Irnakk/sig
  4. I think I've been on chat with him, but I don't remember him at all. Well, I do, but I'm probably confusing him with somebody else. :P Berrybrick 12:19, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
  5. My only concern would be that he is very moody. User:Admiral Neo/sig.
  6. Don't see him on chat very much. User:Wertys761/sig
  7. Per wertys761.--Mr.Brick 16:19, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
  8. I've only seen him once on chat and that was a long time ago. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 03:49, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

You can call me Wertys or Wert, Mr. Brick! ;) User:Wertys761/sig


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

SuperSpyX

SuperSpyX (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - (22 edits, 1,977 mainspace)

I think SSX has been good enough on chat to get his rights reinstated. I think he is a very mature user with over 2000 edits. User:Sonofhades101/signature 21:45, June 18, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101

Support

  1. As nominator. User:Sonofhades101/signature 21:45, June 18, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101
  2. L.pngLegofan100 (talk) 22:43, June 28, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Well, first of all, he's personally attacked me at least three times. And that's just me, Czech's comment makes it sound like there are more, and it doesn't surprise me.
  • Secondly, everytime somebody gets him in trouble, he tries to make it look like it's their fault and creates a forum which CJC or NXT close. Also, during his last chat mod request, almost every time somebody opposed, he would reply to even small things. I don't want a chat mod who has so much self pride that they can't admit when they've done wrong.
  • He seems to expect people to make exceptions for him when he breaks rules. Maybe once or twice, especially when it's something small (not that I'm saying I give him exceptions) but when he's been warned, he just does it again. People who would make good mods should not only follow all of the rules (I know that isn't always possible) but learn from their mistakes. I guess they have to realize that they make mistakes though.
  • He spams (for want of a better word, something tells me people will complain if I use "advertizes") his MOCs on chat. I know it's a small thing, but he doesn't give a reason. He does ask, but he doesn't say what for. He'll bring it up in conversation, then ask. Why do we need to see your MOCs? To me, it just seems like he's trying to switch the conversation over to himself. Honestly, he seems rather self-centered. I could go into more detail about this, but I won't.
  • "Do you already try your hardest to make chat a better place?" You wrote this, right Hades? The last two times I've entered chat when he is on, he has said something like "AUGGHHHHHH" or, er, well, the other time was kind of a personal attack, so I'd rather not say that. I don't see how screaming or whatever when a user he doesn't like comes on chat helps make it a better place, nor do I see how advertising/spamming/I need a better word showing-off his MOCs helps us.
  • Whenever he feels wronged, he not only acts like he wasn't at fault, but looses control and makes threats. I remember seeing this at least twice.
  • He overreacts. On a few occasions where he has spoken to me about himself, all I'll say is "whatever." He takes offense to that and can't seem to fathom why I'm not listening. Well, that's what he thinks. I am listening, I just don't care.
  • Now, let's go over a few chat rules:
  • "Stay on Topic: If there is an active discussion, don't interrupt with a completely unrelated topic, unless it's something that needs immediate attention." MOC pages links. He hasn't disrupted chat with them recently, at least not without asking, but I've only been on with him twice since he last did it.
  • "Nothing controversial: Steer clear of political or religious topics." I recall Ajr claiming he was making racist remarks about Canadians a month or so ago.
  • "Don't advertise: Your website, LEGO model, wiki, picture, video, etc. may be cool, but that doesn't mean everyone wants to hear about it." I don't need to rant about this again, and SSX, if/when your read this, if you feel the need to reply, skip this one. We've argued it to death.
  • And a wiki policy:
  • "Use common sense: If something seems like a stupid thing to do, don't do it. If you are worried that your actions will offend another user, they most likely will." I think that you can find examples through this where he hasn't used common sense, and that's just with my experience with him.
  • Though his edits are usually decent, editing has nothing to do with chat. Nominations, supports, opposes, etc. should not be based on the number or quality of edits. Unless, you know, it's vandalism, but I digress. :P
  • Like CzechMate, said, he is actually pretty immature. Not like lying to get friends and spelling everything ron immature, but the "I (he) can do no wrong" immature.
  • It'll be a lot easier to ban him from chat if he isn't a mod. :P
Berrybrick 21:59, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
  1. One of the most immature users on chat. He got his rights taken away for personal attacks, thinking he was in charge. Immature users should not have chat mod. After reading Berrybrick's text wall, I'm full on oppose. I've even remembered him wanting me de-righted 3-4 times, when he, himslef, as been as immature. Sorry. --User:CzechMate/czech 22:04, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
  1. Well, er, per berry :P - zero
  2. per bb User:Cligra/Sig
  3. Per BB. User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 00:13, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Per all. User:Irnakk/sig
  5. Per Czech and most of BB's comments. -User:Power Jim/sigcode 04:01, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
  6. Per BB --Brick bobby talk it's a trap! 05:59, June 28, 2012 (UTC)
  7. Per CP and BB. Sorry. User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig

Comments

  • BB a text wall? Is this about why he lost the rights... I can't remember why so be sure to include that. User:Sonofhades101/signature 22:03, June 18, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101
  • Neither do I actually, but no, that isn't why. Berrybrick 22:04, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
Now I Know why. Your wall of text seems to have messed with the numbering. I think I will close this. If anyone supports by tomarrow, I will close this.
  • Since everyone thinks I'm some kind of horrid monster I'm not even gonna bother answering most of those questions, except these. "Showing off" my mocs: Did you read what KoN said in the forum about that matter? That is what I think. If I spend 10 hours building/rebuilding something to get it where I want it, and then you just dismiss it just like that, it makes me feel like I shouldn't of spent that time to build it. I'm proud of my mocs and I want people to see them, is there anything wrong with that? Plus it's not spam, I only post each link ONCE. When I said "AAUUGGHH" the first time, it was because of the mocpages uploader, which wasn't working, not because of you. I can admit that I am wrong, when I get into an arguement and have a chance to cool down, I usually apologize, this happened with AJR, after the racist bit he banned me, then the next morning I had cooled down and I apologized, and he apologized (for the thing that had made me mad) and unbanned me and now we're friends, even though we don't see each other much. User:SuperSpyX/Sig2
  • Yep, and we decided that as long as it was once and they gave a reason, we'd allow it. Create a page then, or PM people. Don't change the conversation just so that you can feel good about yourself. I know that you apologized, but you still said it. It's good that he has forgiven you, but it doesn't mean you won't do it again. You have PA'd people time and time again after receiving warnings, after all. Berrybrick 13:11, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
  • Did you 2 HAVE to make it so long? :P User:Irnakk/sig


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful, user requested archive

LMFS

LMFS (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I am mature, friendly, and respectful. It is okay if I am not a mod but it is worth a try.

Support

Oppose

  1. Inability to format this properly is really off-putting, ad user almost got banned today, not a good quality. User:CzechMate/czech

Neutral

Comments


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Wertys761

Wertys761 (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

I've been on Brickipedia for a while. I have plenty of experience on other sites as chat moderator, and am ready to take on the position for Bricki.

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  1. Only ever seen this user on once, don't see them having a need for these rights and I'm not too sure about there maturity.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  2. per clone. Only seen you once. User:Sonofhades101/signature
  3. Only visits the site once every few months, I don't think he'd need the rights. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 17:04, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Not ready for the responsibility. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 17:13, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Per KoN. User:Admiral Neo/sig.
  6. Sorry to say, per KoN. --User:CzechMate/czech 02:24, June 16, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • I think you guys have only seen me once because I don't go on chat often with you guys.
  • um... I am on daily... For hours at a time... At tons of different times...mi look at chat logs... I have never seen you until today... If I may add, a mod needs to be on chat a lot. Knight add alot picture. User:Sonofhades101/signature 16:57, June 15, 2012 (UTC) Sonofhades101


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Alien Cyborg

I think I am mature enough and I am a decent user on chat --User:Alien Cyborg/sig 23:17, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  • He may be my brother but I think he is mature enough and he does have an awesome brother :P --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 23:37, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • because your a good persion- axs678
  • Weak suuport-He is new but super mature. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 15:45, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

  • Really? Your chat block was just lifted, if anybody takes a look at his talk page you can see that he is underage. OPPOSE--WCDDoherty 16:46, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
    • Actually, his block from editing was lifted, due to a mistake. People thought he was CzechMate's sockpuppet, when really, he was his brother. Also, he is not underage- please don't just to conclusions. He, along with CzechMate, said he is 13 years old. User:Skdhjf/SigT 17:19, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose - You just got back from a long period of inactivity three days ago. Take it easy, sir. FB100Z • talk • contribs 18:59, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • I say no, user is sometimes inappropriate and also per Tat and FB. User:SuperSpyX/Sig1 12:45, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Sorry but per FB, you will be good but please just wait a while, yes you may be good but we hardly know you. The fact is you've only got this many votes as your CP's bro Prisinorzero 18:57, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • Inactivity, underage, you were just blocked, so we can't tell if you are very mature, sometimes inappropriate. Take it easy. User:Sonofhades101/signature
  • Per FB100Z, βᵒᵇ βʳᶦᶜᵏˢ Ʈᵃᶫᵏ · βᶫᵒᵍ

Comments

  • Who are you? I've never seen you before, nor on chat. User:CM4S/Sig
    • They thought I was a sockpuppet so they blocked me but, I'm just CP's brother and nothing more. --User:Alien Cyborg/sig 23:22, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
      • Odd. He's never mentioned anything about having a brother. User:CM4S/Sig
        • He has a few times. I'm not usually on the computer too much and me and Czech talk to each other enough at home :P --User:Alien Cyborg/sig 23:24, April 5, 2012 (UTC)


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Grovyle4life

I am re-nominating myself as chat mod because I have just come back to the wiki and have realized that I lost it while I was gone. That is all. A'm actually still alive, everybody 12:15, April 14, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

What do you think I should do to "reset the foundation" and get "back to the wiki"? A'm actually still alive, everybody 13:35, April 14, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Same with me, you just got back. But wait a couple of months, I will change it. Possibly. User:Evanf/Sig
  • I agree with evanf--WCDDoherty 14:01, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Weak oppose - Yeah, I'd wait a little on this one. FB100Z • talk • contribs 17:26, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Only because before you left you attacked me a lot on chat. Prisinorzero 15:10, April 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Evanf. User:LEGOSpinjitzu/Sig

Comments

  • Request for Closure


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

Sonofhades101

Sonofhades is a trusted user on chat, He knows when to ban someone, he's often helped me out too, Nothing bad can happen from giving him these rights, he's mature enough AND it'd be a great learning experience for him too.

User:Sonofhades101/signature: I felt I had better add this. It's not politics, to get myself votes. It's true. I spent a day thinking about this. This entire, for want of a better word, speech. A while ago, an amazing user left the wiki. Forever or not, I don't know. He had a lot going on for him here, Tat. He was an mod and admin, I think. Lots of edits, lots of friends. It shocked me when he left. He was a person who contributed so much to the wiki. But that wasn't what amazed me. I felt the same way he did. Chat was bringing me down.Then I realized, I needed to think about leaving. And I did. I really almost left. I made a list of reasons on why I should leave and why I should stay. The list of reasons almost took me away from the wiki. I wondered if it had been partly my fault in his leaving. It was. I could have put up a better stand of my beliefs. My standards should show. For want of a better term, I shall use "Not very nice people". The battle between the "Not very nice people" will always continue. To be a mod, the user has to set a good example. If everyone did that, the "not very nice people" would not exist. Tat would have not had another reason to leave. Chat shouldn't be bringing me down. And it doesn't have to. If we are a positive force, chat will become a better place. Either way, win or lose, I need to help the wiki more. I need to be better in chat. I guess this finished my thoughts. Well, see you around guys. It's been a while but I guess I should add some stuff about myself: Um... I have around 600 edits, I am on chat every time I come on wiki, which is what I do every time I go on the computer, My favorite theme would have to be Ninjago, and I am awesome. I guess for more, you have to check my user page.

Support

WCDDoherty Talk Contribs

  • ok--ToaMatau talk
  • He's dedicated. I'm the ninja who eats acorns!
  • Sure. User:Ajraddatz/sig 14:31, April 23, 2012 (UTC)
  • After talking to this guy, definitely support. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 14:50, April 23, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nice Guy! Helped me fit right in right when I joined! He would make a good Chat Monitor cause he knows what he's doing, he's good with people, and I'm lucky he's my friend!Signed,Jay-Master-of-Lightning.
  • I never realized what this user's been doing until I saw this, and he definitely deserves it! User:Drew1200/Sigifier

Neutral

Oppose

Comments

WCDDoherty Talk Contribs


Br1ck animat0r[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

I am mature enough and sensible enough to moderate chat, I spend every minute of my free time on chat and feel I could benefit and improve our chat room, I don't like vulgar users or vulgar language, I am easy going on new users, know when it's appropriate to issue a warning and have even helped chat mods with their duties in the past. If you feel the need to oppose, please leave your explaination in the comments section. Thanks. --From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 08:46, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  • I wouldn't mind him being one. He is mature. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 08:37, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • Matture, nice and friendly definately what i like to see in a chat mod.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • Yeah, he's mature and polite. Know's the important meaning of grammar and knows the difference between a troll and a new user. Prisinorzero 14:44, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • great friend, fun and does community friendly things --Brick bobby - we need a CJC signal 16:54, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • he is nice,smart,and mature i vote! who is it?
  • he is awsome i vote him he is sweet Zag100

Neutral

  • Sure, he's my friend, nice, and mature. I don't think he needs them, neither should half the people who currently have it. We have too many, we need none more. Sorry, Jon. Please don't hate me for this. User:CM4S/Sig
  • I thought we where supposed to wait until a month after the last request closed, but whatever. :P User:Drew1200/Sigifier
  • Less active than before. ~ CJC 11:22, April 21, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  • I haven't seen Br1ck on for quite a while, and he may, as WC suggests, have changed. However, I have no new experience with him, and all my old has been bad. User:Cligra/Sig
  • When i was first on the Wiki Br1ck was awful, I have noticed and he has became really sensable, i think he would be a decent mod, but if you look at his talk page he has had warnings for personal attacks,so mabye, I OPPOSE--WCDDoherty 18:33, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • As resident MOCcer, animat0r and internet specialist for Br1ckipedia, I would like to see if anyone would like to see me as chat mod... Well... Here you go. Speak your mind of me.

"7 Steps to World Domination" By Jonathan Rogers --From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 08:37, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

  • Since it is over 80% majority, I have given him the rights. However, I am not sure if I am missing something, so if there is problem, let me know before removing the rights. Thank you, not archiving til I know all is well. -User:Nerfblasterpro/sig1 15:13, April 23, 2012 (UTC)


Creeper S[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

Detailed explanation of why you are nominating this user/yourself for chat moderator.

I am nominating myself for chat moderator because of the recent events of the troll, known as Steven or Volcam. I have been on the chat for over 9 months now, and have seen trolls come and go. I know some people think that 9 months is 'new'. But personally, I beg to differ. Okay I don't have many edits, but that does not affect how I am on chat. I believe that I am mature and sensible. So it would be kind of you to vote support for me. Thank you.

Support

Neutral

Oppose

*I don't see him on much, and I do not trust him h the tools yet. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 22:54, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

Comments


Ninja-squirrel5[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

I am nominating myself for chat moderator becuase I try my very best to be polite and kind. I also try very hard not to swear or talk about inappropriate things. Also, I try to be mature, as I am fourteen.

Support

Neutral

Oppose


Comments

  • Request for closure, user has been canvassing votes in PMs and talkpages. User:Cligra/Sig
  • Closed - SNOW and canvassing. ~ CJC 11:22, April 21, 2012 (UTC)


Clone gunner commander jedi[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Successful

I think he'd be good and, this is a restart I removed opposes and supports. Please ad your opinion.

Support

  • "7 Steps to World Domination" by Br1ck Animat0r. --From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 16:13, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • I actually think CGCJ has been good on chat. --User:Alien Cyborg/sig 08:49, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Seems more sensible than a couple of other users with chatmod rights NovaHawk 08:56, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

*I trust him myself. He IS a good user, and very much mature. What happend on LMBW doesn't matter now. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 08:57, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

User has been rude to other users on chat, and has been disobeying some rules. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 06:18, April 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Yes. He should be a Chat Moderator. -Lego Whovian 09:02, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • yo can just look at his edits to see how vital he is to the wiki, he is experienced and is on chat often so why not --Brick bobby - It's a trap! 10:28, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Yeah, he'd be a fine Chat mod. -User:Power Jim/sigcode
  • He has matured on chat or more over I'VE matured on chat so he won't have to abuse his powers to unban me :P Prisinorzero 10:44, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Cgcj has been more than good on chat. He has matured and I think he would use his (might be) powers well. He is nice and helpful. I think he should be a mod for these reasons and the ones above! He has alot of edits to and has been on this wiki for a long time... --User:Sonofhades101/signature
  • --User:LSCStealthNinja/RealSig
  • He is always on the chat, and he treats people well these days. --LEGOSpinjitzu 15:14, April 9, 2012 (UTC)LEGOSpinjitzu
  • Weak support He is ok. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 15:17, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support - This guy is changing, and for the better. Just try not to screw things up. ;) User:Skdhjf/SigT 19:07, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • In my opinion, CGCJ has been humbled, and has matured a lot as a result. I've had several times where CGCJ's been bullied on chat but unable to sort it out by himself. Poor lad. Anyhow, I'd trust him with these rights now. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 19:22, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • 12 support :D Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • Make that 13! He has been great ever since... whenever I started. Strong support! Creeper S
  • Per NHL. User:SKP4472/sig2 09:57, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
  • I have 3 reason why he should be a chatmod, 1. Always on Chat, 2. Trusted User, 3. Very mature,

Bob bricks • Talk • Blog Brickchatlog.png

Neutral

  • Neutral - This is a bit...difficult. FB100Z • talk • contribs 04:26, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per FB. ~ CJC 21:13, April 15, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  • While CGCJ has matured some, I still do not think I can trust him as a ChatMod. The system is much better now, and I know that if he misuses the rights, that they'll be removed much quicker. However, before, when he had them, he banned nearly anyone from the LMB Wiki, or any newbie that he didn't like. I don't think he'd do that again, but it was so bad that I don't think I could do anything but oppose this request. I hate to bring this up again, but he also participated in the vandalism on the LMBW. I wouldn't bring it up at all, except that I think it took him months to get to the point where he could be trusted to not do it again. I won't be upset if he does get the rights, being that they'll be removed if he misuses them. But, I still must oppose because of the above reasons. User:Drew1200/Sigifier
    • Well i would rather forget the vandalism of the lego message board wiki Clone gunner commander jedi talk
      • Yes, I know, that's why I hated to bring it up, but I do believe it was only about 2 months ago where I felt like I could trust you to not do it again. :( User:Drew1200/Sigifier
  • Not sure yet as he would more than likely misuse the rights, he seems mature but he goes off on newbies a lot and so fourth so yeah. Not that he is a bad user(he is great) but when it comes to chat no.-User:Jedi master sith/sig
  • Per Drew. User:CM4S/Sig
  • 4 oppose Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • If this passes, chat will be a disaster. No offense, but he is humorless and rather anti-social. User:SuperSpyX/Sig1 13:13, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oh, god help us--Ninjago9 22:41, April 12, 2012 (UTC)
  • Were we not just having a fourm of why he should be blocked?--WCDDoherty 22:45, April 12, 2012 (UTC)
    • No we weren't, but we also had on for chzech and he's becoming an admin?
  • No. Banned for a week last month for swearing and trolling. Doesn't need these rights. User:Dataman1/sig 23:30, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
  • I've lost faith in CGCJ, He's got some things against users on other wikis, and some on here. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 06:18, April 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Czech and SSX. --User:Alien Cyborg/sig 04:48, April 16, 2012 (UTC)
  • I oppose because he's rude. In the chat room, he said some dirty stuff to me and some of the other people in there, and he just doesn't seem mature enough to be nominated. KatenVaughn 20:12, April 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Can we have this closed and archived now?Clone gunner commander jedi talk
    • This request was never filled out properly, and never appeared in BP:URR due to the cat not being added... should it be closed, or restart it since it never showed up in the requests page? :S NovaHawk 08:04, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • I removed supports/oppoes to start it off again. --User:Alien Cyborg/sig 08:51, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
    • It should have technically closed in February anyway, so I think that should be enough time "between requests" NovaHawk 08:56, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Request for early closure. Clear consensus to make chatmod. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 01:07, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Request for closure FB100Z • talk • contribs 04:40, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Request for closure; clear consensus that i shall be getting the rights Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • I don't know much about chatmod requests, so if an admin wants to overturn this, it's fine, but I am giving CGCJ the rights, because I don thing the support argument is stronger, (and I am in pain reading this comments section). User:UltrasonicNXT/Signature

ColelovezMintz Hayward Greenless[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

I am on chat lots and i am really mature. If you would take the time to vote i would be greatfull.

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  • No offence, but u are too new, u need some edits, and u need to be on chat more.Sonofhades101 01:27, March 26, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101
  • Cole's grammar and spelling is an issue, and LSC is set to fill in the open Chatmod role. Plus, the user isn't mature enough. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 01:56, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
  • Maturity concerns... Berrybrick 10:22, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
  • I've had to ban im for spam in the past, which is not something I want to have to do to a mod. User:Cligra/Sig
  • Sorry, oppose, your too new to the wiki, sorry and from your talk page it says you
  • have created a nonsense page, not what most users would like to see in a chatmod --WCDDoherty 22:53, March 29, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Take it easy, fella, you're still new. FB100Z • talk • contribs 22:00, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Mabye some other time, you just joined the wiki!
  • I almost banned him this morning, not a good thing -_- --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 23:24, March 29, 2012 (UTC)
  • This is nonsense, DELETE IT ALREADY--WCDDoherty 21:17, April 1, 2012 (UTC)

Evanf[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful (closed due to user canvassing for votes)

Hi, I would like to become a Chat Moderator. I meet the requirements, I am most always on Chat, and I am an experienced user. I edit pages every day, I will always respond to people, and I have been here for a while. Thanks for your consideration, and just thank you. User:Evanf/Sig

Support

  • already supporting - Ezio Matrix
  • He is a good user, I just got here, and I have seen him in action and he is a good user. Template:U:Altair&ezio123

Neutral

Oppose

  • Only just come back, a month or 2 and I will support --Brick bobby - maze of the heroes RPG 14:04, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • Never seen you on chat.-User:CM4S/Sig
  • Sorry, Mabye if you had some more edits. I rarely see you on chat, on the time im on chat, I have only seen you once or twice. "I edit pages every day," You add a period or two, cut down on the badge farming "I have been here for a while" Hmm, 12 days is not a while , --WCDDoherty 18:28, April 2, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • possible sockpuppet, a new user by the name of Greenninja440 changed Clone's vote from neutral to support. The vote has been changed back now by CLone --Brick bobby - maze of the heroes RPG 14:13, April 2, 2012 (UTC)

Comment: He is not a sockpuppet, I don't have any. User:Evanf/Sig

  • I think you are a sockpuppet, I have asked the admins to check --Brick bobby - maze of the heroes RPG 14:18, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
    • Take a look at the edit itself- [2]. While at first, by looking at the result it produced, it did look like this, looking at the code it's obviously just a formatting error, where the user took off the --> of the comment, which blanked out his vote, as well as the "neutral" heading. NovaHawk 14:24, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • He's been telling people on chat to vote for him.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • You just joined, --WCDDoherty 18:29, April 2, 2012 (UTC)

Br1ck animat0r[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Br1ck animat0r is very mature and is usually on a lot, and deserves to be a Chat Moderator.

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  • Even though that I consider Br1ck a friend, I have to oppose for two reasons. The foremost being the vandalism he contributed to on the LMBW. I know he has matured some since then, but not completely. I would show the vandalism as proof, but it is way to inappropriate to display in public (although I do have it for those who don't believe me). The second is that I've seen him make up stories to try to get out of trouble, or get other users in trouble. Between these three things, I still don't know if I'm OK with it, but he has been a great user for a long time now. :) User:Drew1200/Sigifier
  • Per Drew, really. User:Cligra/Sig

Comments

  • RE:Request for closure Thanks for that Cligra 0_0 I didn't know what that was or why it was bad. If one of you had told me I wouldn't have but you didn't so... Well, there you go.

--From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 19:19, March 29, 2012 (UTC)

Mr.Brick[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Detailed explanation of why you are nominating this user/yourself for chat moderator.I,Mr.Brick want to be a chat mod.Here are the reasons why:I know there is alot of mods(more than non-mods) but most people get away with swearing and plus i know the rules of chat.i have learned alot since the past 5 months and i feel like im ready,hopefully you guys feel the same way.

Support

  • hes is awesome and he is hear all the time! i suport! ColelovezMintz Hayward greenlees
  • i also Support!Zag100
  • I support him. Hes here alot, hes nice, and he would use the mod powers well! He deserves it! Also, I saw him take another user and help him to get the feeling of the brickipedia. It was really nice of him.Sonofhades101 21:34, March 18, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101

I heard about that sonofhades.he is a nice guy,he is on chat most of the time and he seems experinced User:The Lego Expert

Neutral

  • I'm not sure if he's ready yet, but he has good intentions. Maybe in the near future... User:1999bug/sig1 16:59, March 18, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Oppose - Even more immature than I am. Not ready for this. User:Dataman1/sig 16:58, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • Maturity concerns. I have also been tipped off that he may be canvassing the vote, but I'll have to wait for the chat logs to be updated to see if he's been doing it outside of PMs. Berrybrick 17:55, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • Definite maturity issues. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 18:02, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • Still not trying to be a hypocrite, but... we have WAY too many mods. --User:Makuta Tarkairadan/PSig 18:04, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • Can't type in coherent English, and we have enough chat mods. User:Ajraddatz/sig 21:41, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • You can never have enough many mods IMO, but there ares still definite maturity concerns. User:Cligra/Sig
  • Way too imature and not on chat enough.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • Per AJR and Clone. User:SuperSpyX/Sig1 22:02, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • WAY TOO IMMATURE Sorry, but we all know it. User:CM4S/Sig
  • big maturity issues --Brick bobby 22:28, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • No, just no. He starts chat flames, and we seem to have enough protection.--User:Crazed Penguin/spook 23:01, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • NO He is immature and can't spell. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 14:44, March 19, 2012 (UTC)
  • I've never met him, but I think sockpuppeting is a big enough reason to oppose User:Drew1200/Sigifier
  • Extreme Oppose Never seen him on chat, extremely immature, and possible use of sockpuppeting. User:LSCStealthNinja/Sig LSCStealthNinja 11:07, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose Barely know him, and on the rare occasions where I have seen him on chat he acts quite immature. -User:Power Jim/sigcode

Comments

  • Vote for Mr.Brick as Chat Moderator!:)
  • about my my english on chat,i have typos and try to make words shorter-User:Mr.Brick
  • It seems fishy a few new users are supporting him. Can someone go throught the logs to check for canvassing? --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 02:46, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
    • Agreed, they don't even provide a good reason for voting.
      • All they say is "I heard he'd be good" and things like that. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 04:00, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
        • I will look. I do recall him saying something along the lines of, "I have two more people to vote for me, but I don't want to say who yet." Berrybrick 10:59, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
          • It does seem fishy. These same people support everyone, with nonsense reasons like, I heard him help someone, or he would be great. Colemintz, sonofhades, and z100. User:LSCStealthNinja/Sig LSCStealthNinja 11:04, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
            • THere wasn't any advertising this on the main screen (but I did notice he was advertising his knock off wiki) and it always seemed as though he would say, "____ PM me," right before they voted. Berrybrick 11:10, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Who is the other sockpuppet if he is one?ToaMatau2004 talk


The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

ToaMatau2004

I see people fighting sometimes on chat and want to stop that.I think when I am on I am nice to people.

Support

Neutral

Oppose


LSCStealthNinja[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

He's a very mature user, He knows the rules and, I'd trust him. He is only a few months old on Brickipedia but is very much mature enough.

Support

Neutral

  • I think he is mature enough, however I think we have enough chat mods at the moment.

User:SuperSpyX/Sig1 15:31, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

*Not on enough, not sure if he is mature enough and do we really need another chat mod?Clone gunner commander jedi talk

  • i agree with clone gunner commander jedi-User:Mr.Brick
    • That vote isn't really good enough, Mr.Brick has no grammar on that oppose, and he himself is banned from chat. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 23:28, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
      • Striking the vote, as, A: SSX just got de-modded so we have an opening, and, B: it isn't a valid oppose anyway. User:Cligra/Sig


No offense, but I have never seen you on chat, so how can you know if I am not on? User:LSCStealthNinja/Sig LSCStealthNinja 12:25, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

  • No, just no. Yes, hes' mature, but we don't need anymore chat mods! We have chat mods that ban too much (NOT ME. I BAN FOR GOOD PURPOSES.), and they just-- No! User:CM4S/Sig

Comments

  • I know exactly what to do on chat if someone is saying offensive language, swearing or spamming. For offensive language, swearing, and spamming,: 3 Warnings. If it continues, and the user refuses, I will ban for one day. If the same user still continues after that, one week. If it still continues, one month. And if it still continues, permanent. I know where to list blocked users. I have never been blocked from chat or recieved a warning template on my talk page. User:LSCStealthNinja/Sig LSCStealthNinja 09:49, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
    • Actually, you're supposed to give 3 warnings for everything, unless it's something extremely serious (and they don't consider swearing extremely serious). After 3 warnings you can ban a user for swearing. User:Drew1200/Sigifier

CM4S (2)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

Ok. Listen. I know, I've had lots of bad times in the past, and we all learn from our mistakes. I see tons of trolling, and lying, and spamming, all the time on chat. I go on there, literally EVERY day. I warn the trolls, and spammers. Yet..the chat mods don't do a single thing. I'd act right away. 3 strikes, and you're out. Just..give me a chance. Here come the opposes, rolling in!

User:CM4S/Sig (<--Lol. This explains this whole page :D)

Support

Mods thought I was too aggressive or something. User:CM4S/Sig

Neutral

  • User seems to be like the most banned user from chat ever. I don't know about chat, but isn't exactly the nicest person with blog comments. Not opposing because I don't really know what happens in chat. NovaHawk 01:15, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • He's OK, But backstabs and "slags" people off behind their back. He's umm...a strong personality. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 01:36, March 15, 2012 (UTC) (Moved to oppose section)

Oppose

  • Nope, definitely not. I believe the user has good intentions (hopefully) in using the rights, but he is way too immature for them. First, he personal attacks lots of users, then he slanders users he doesn't like behind their backs (that's what people tell me), his language got him how many bans, he got blocked for attacking someone, and also he one time attempted to link to an explicit image. I personally think this user definitely needs to mature a great deal more before he gets chat moderator rights. In addition to this, I believe chat moderators are users who help the "keep the chat tamed" in a sense. They break up fights, ban spammers, personal attackers, people who use bad language, post bad content, and other sorts. I'd say this user does NOT do this stuff but does the exact things moderators attempt to prevent- and would you call that a chat moderator? User:Skdhjf/SigT 01:05, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
Tat...... You just said that he is a good for a chat mod in that last part... :0 --User:Makuta Tarkairadan/PSig 01:32, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
He's saying I spam, I fight, I cuss, I post bad content, and I offend people. With my face. User:CM4S/Sig
  • A few reasons: He is very caustic and unpleasant on chat, which is not an attitude we want in a mod. Last time he was a mod he was hugely unpleasant most of the time... Also, he's been banned twelve times... Doesn't really seem like ideal mod material, overall. User:Cligra/Sig
Well, then, since the two of the most powerful people on this wiki are opposing for reasonable reasons, why not close this? Hmm? :) User:CM4S/Sig
.....Two most powerful people on the wiki? I'm flattered...User:Cligra/Sig
How comes Tat and Clig get to be most powerful. :O - CJC 19:37, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • Changing to oppose. He has a deeply negative atttitude that brings out the worst in him. Last time he was OK but he needs to learn to keep his fingers off the keyboard. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 01:49, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • We do not need this attitude in chat moderators. I definitely oppose this. User:Ajraddatz/sig 18:49, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • sometimes is a good mod but anger and rage sometimes is not good and we want mods to be good all of the time --Brick bobby 22:31, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • Recently, he's been a good friend, but last time he got ChatMod it almost seemed like the power turned him evil er something. :P Also per Cligra. User:Drew1200/Sigifier

Comments

LEGOSpinjitzu[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

I, LEGOSpinjitzu would like to be a mod. I talk with my friends everyday on chat. I treat people well. I promise, I will not abuse my powers.

Support

  • He is very nice. He seeks to break up fights and is very mature. He was very nice and decent. I think, of all people, he deserves a modship and would use it well!Sonofhades101 17:37, March 14, 2012 (UTC)Sonofhades101

Neutral

Oppose

  • I find him to be imatture at times and he is not on enough imo.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • User definitely needs to be on chat a lot more, and also needs a little more maturity. Don't think he'd be a good mod as of now. Edit: User also campaigned two times (if not more) for chat mod rights on chat- definitely needs more maturity. User:Skdhjf/SigT 18:38, March 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • We already have way too many mods. In fact, there are more mods that are on chat than non-mods. I am not trying to be a hypocrite. >_> --User:Makuta Tarkairadan/PSig 18:15, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  • He's canvassing. Enough reason to say no. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 18:17, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per KoN, and CGCJ. User:Drew1200/Sigifier

Comments

  • Korppufin thinks the chatting is arwsome.

Creeper S[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

I am on this chat every time I come on my PC! I'd never kick someone for an odd reason or any thing like that. I've been on the chat for 6 months (obviously not consecutive). It would be an honour to become a chat mod, and I will ban people wisely (unless no one needs banning of course!) I know some people don't think I make enough edits, but that's only because everything around here is almost perfect! It would be great if you could vote for me, and I have considered the fact that there is a forum about too many chat mods. I have noticed the fact that people don't see on the chat often. This is only because of different time zones. I suggest you ask Clone Gunner Commander Jedi as a witness to how often I am on the chat. Thank you!


Support

  • I vote yes! I see him on chat all the time, he is very mature and would be a usful chatmod!!! -Bob bricks Talk
  • Totally. Hes nice and very mature. Great chat mod! I vote yes! He has my full support.Ebilwgrevious 15:14, March 4, 2012 (UTC) Ebilwgrevious
  • He's always great and responsible on chat! Prisinorzero 18:39, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

Mature, experienced and friendly --Brick bobby 19:50, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Maybe... i am not sure yet if he should be CM he is mature but i am just not to sure. -_- Jedi Master Sith
  • I've only seen you on chat once or twice, so I can't really judge. User:Cligra/Sig
  • Very mature, uses proper punctuation and is friendly HOWEVER he is kinda new. —Unsigned comment by Darth henry (talk • contribs). 19:39, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • Don't know him very much, kinda new, seems mature, though. --User:Makuta Tarkairadan/PSig 19:48, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments


CzechMate 2[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was successful

I've been told I'm mature enough for these rights, I'm on chat too much (if that's a problem :P) and I can sort out the problems. I want to be the solution; not the problem. I have experience for Chat mod too. I'm almost a year old on BP. I'm tired of not having the rights after I had them before chat was stopped for a month. I give 2 warnings, since you get one when you join chat. I've matured alot and been nominated for BP:BOTM of which has been great. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 00:59, March 10, 2012 (UTC)

--User:Crazed Penguin/spook 00:50, March 10, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

Comments


Ebilwgrevious[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was unsuccessful

I am Ebilwgrevious and I want to be a mod. Before I state why, I want to tell you about myself. I have 147 edits and I joined a month ago. That's more edits than some, and I have been on longer than some. Few actually, but you get the point. I usually get on chat in the morning or any other time I can. And the morning is sometimes where we need a mod the most. I'm ranked 161 on this wiki. Last week, I was about 350 on this wiki. I love Ninjago. I also like Castle from around 2007. Now to business. I would not misuse the power of the chat mod. I'd be honored o have it. I would not hesitate to give a warning if that is needed. But if it isn't, I won't give you one anyway. Anyways, I'll just let you guys find this. Vote for me, either good, or bad. Maybe, the next time I talk to someone, I'd be a mod! Just maybe.

Support

Neutral

Oppose

Comments

  • I thought Jedi and Clone would say that.
  • Closed early, due to unanimous oppose after a week, no need to drag it out further NovaHawk 01:03, March 13, 2012 (UTC)


Brick bobby[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was not done, no consensus

I am a mature user who would be a harsh but fair chat mod. I would be devoted to sorting out chat. I have behaved well on chat and I am a friendly user, hated by nobody. --Brick bobby 19:20, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  • Brick bobby is an expert user on chat. He'd be a good choice.--User:Crazed Penguin/spook 21:31, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
  • You have my full support.Ebilwgrevious 14:35, March 5, 2012 (UTC)Ebilwgrevious

Neutral

Different time zones probably --Brick bobby 07:21, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

That's what zero said. Drewlzoo(talk) (blogs)
Ah, good point. User:LSCStealthNinja/Sig LSCStealthNinja 13:21, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Hmm, not so sure. I see the user on chat once sort of a fair amount of time, but I think he should be on more. User:Skdhjf/SigT 03:10, March 10, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments


Drew1200 2[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was done

Last month I made the mistake of requesting Moderator only 3 days after chat was enabled. Not did that not give anyone a chance to know me, I was away 2 of the 3 days causing users to think I never used chat. That caused me to not get the rights. I think that I have a better chance now, and also, I think I could do a good job if someone where to write down a policy for Moderators (or at least show me an existing one). The biggest reason I'm requesting this, is because I get on early in the morning every day that I'm home (which is about 3-4 a week). There's hardly ever a Moderator on, and it's the most common time when I see people in need of warnings.

Support


Prisinorzero[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was succesful

As most will now know that chat is on its way to being permanently disabled, and I whole heartily agree. But is that the easy way out? I don't think its chats fault but our own, so we have to not change chat, but ourselves. And that starts with the mods along with some of them being pruned out we also need stricter ones. This is why I am nominating myself. I'm certainly not afraid to make a few enemy's by blocking harshly, and if I'm instated, I sure as hell will block harshly. Not to annoy people and so I fell big and powerful, but to try and get a bit more discipline into chat, now this doesn't mean I won't be fair, I'll give three warning (each would be displayed in the chat ban box with an extract of chat when that happened) but also inform you of what you've done in chat and on your talk page. I understand that this is a very controversial nomination mainly because of who I am and not just because you think I'll be a tad harsh, but I would never of thought of nominating myself usually, but chat needs to take a big U-Turn or be shut down forever. Please now be honest here, not just with me, but with yourselves.

Thank You. Prisinorzero 19:12, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  • he is a friendly mature user who can help with chat --Brick bobby 19:14, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
  • - CJC 19:32, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
  • Lately he has been showing all the signs of having the potential to be a great mod.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • I know we've had some problems in the past, and to be honest, I still don't think of you as the greatest user, but I just can't bring myself to oppose, because I know you'd do a great job. :) Drewlzoo(talk) (blogs)
  • Excellent user, deserves these rights. I believe he will use them wisely.

--User:Makuta Tarkairadan/PSig 19:54, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

  • Absolutely --From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 16:41, February 29, 2012 (UTC)
  • I say yes. User:SuperSpyX/Sig1 19:19, February 29, 2012 (UTC)
  • He would be the last person I would say no to, and per Makuta --Bob bricks Talk
  • I would say he can handle the tools responsibly. User:Cligra/Sig
  • I think he would do a good job. Plus your Description helped :P Ldv2010.jpgFather and SonLuke Skywalker Tatooine New.gif May the force be with you. 19:40, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • When he is in chat, he's always acting nice, and polite, and when there's a problem, he usually stops it. User:Awesomeknight1234/SigbyCP
  • No offense to him, but when he first started chatting he was annoying as heck. =P Now he's a cool guy to have around and stays calm. I think chat moderator is a good position for him to hold. User:1999bug/sig1 20:26, March 2, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  • A little concerned. I haven't had any problems recently, but I'm neutral for now anyway. Berrybrick 19:43, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
  • Agreed. He is friendly though, that's why I chose neutral.

User blog:LSCStealthNinja/RainbowSig LSCStealthNinja 19:47, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments


LegoLord[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was not done

Even though is isn't very active he is EXTREMELY MATURE and handles himself well. He would be a good chatmod

Support

  • As nominator. User:Darth henry/Sig 3 13:57, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support, only because I saw him on the chat a few days ago and he swore he'd monitor chat way more often. He also thinks he deserves these rights considering he had the rights before chat was closed. User:1999bug/sig1 02:20, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support, mature user. I don't personally know how much this user is on chat (how weird) though. User:Captain Jag/sig1 07:00, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support""" - Yes siree bob on a corn cob. User:MassiveSodaDuck/SigMaster

Neutral

  • Not really all that active... User:Mr. Minifigure/sig 03:24, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • I agree with Darth henry, and I enjoyed the chat I had with Lego lord yesterday. However, he isn't all that active. If he's on chat more often, I will support though. Berrybrick 13:02, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • Not very active. - CJC 18:07, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  • I haven't seem him on in AGES. Last time I did, It was September. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 04:24, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • Not really active, not sure if we need more chatmods when he is. Other than that no concerns with the user's conduct. User:Ajraddatz/sig 05:17, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • He hasn't been on since he made this request (almost a month ago) Drewlzoo(talk) (blogs)
  • Virtually inactive. No other concerns. FB100Z • talk • contribs 20:45, March 2, 2012 (UTC)

Comments


RaceLord[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was not done

Because i will not be a Admin for a while and i also want to be a Chat mod, i picked i should Request it.

  • I am on the Chat for about 12 hours a day (unless i am out of town or not on my Computer),
  • Even though i am AFK (Away from Keyboard) for a while i do check back on the chat every so offen.
  • When i am eating i mite/will not be on the chat.
  • I mite be Disconected when i am AFK.
  • and a few other good and not great things as well that i can't think right now.

I will be a great Chat Mod
Please Support

Support

Neutral

  • A bit immature, but I've never had issues with him, so I don't really have an opinion. User:Cligra/Sig
  • Turned off by the "please support" in the nom statement, and concerns with maturity. User:Ajraddatz/sig 14:52, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Not certain. Certainly not a user I have any issues with, but I can't find myself edging to support. - CJC 15:30, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • His on chat very often, but he could use a little more experience. So I'm not sure. -Power Jim 06:57, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per CJC. User:SKP4472/sig2 07:54, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments


Jedi_master_sith[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was not done

I am on chat alot and i know what users need to be banned or not if they do something bad i give them two warnings third is out

Support

Neutral

Oppose

Comments


Bob bricks[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was done

I bob bricks would like to be Chat Mod, because I am always on chat, very mature, and I will not abuse my powers, I hope to become this because of how active I am. I am a very trusting user, and have always loved this wiki, and all those who do support me I do thank you very very much Bob bricks Talk

Support

User:Awesomeknight1234/SigbyCP

Neutral

Oppose

  • Nope. --CP
    • Elucidate please Berrybrick 20:04, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
  • I just don't think you'd do a good job....no offense to you but, now might not be the time. User:MassiveSodaDuck/SigMaster 14:00, February 18, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • I've closed this as done. While there are lots of people neutral, overall there is a much stronger argument for than against. User:Ajraddatz/sig 03:43, March 2, 2012 (UTC)


MassiveSodaDuck[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was not done

Hello, i'm MassiveSodaDuck, nominating myself for chat moderator rights. I am a chat mod at some wikis, and I know how to use the rights. I know to give 3 warnings before banning, to record my blocks in the chat block log, and I don't spam. I am active every day on Wikia. I have been a member since the day I joined Wikia, and I hope I can help the wiki more by getting these rights. Thanks, User:MassiveSodaDuck/SigMaster

Support

Neutral

  • I haven't seen you on much, so I don't really have an opinion. User:Cligra/Sig
  • User:1999bug/sig1 22:39, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
  • same as cliggs i havent sen you any, so i cant make an opinion.-Mr.Brick

Oppose

  • No.--CP
Not mature enough for my liking. --CP
  • Per CJC Drewlzoo(talk) (blogs)
  • Bob bricks Talk
  • I don't think now is the right time. Future perhaps. - CJC 15:28, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • If he's able to display sufficient maturity on chat currently, then yes to a future request. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 15:39, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per CJC and KoN. Perhaps in the future. User:SKP4472/sig2 07:56, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

CzechMate[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Yep. Just the usual ask here. I'd like the rights because 1) I'm on chat everyday (Unless I'm at hospital) 2) I changed names for a nicer approach 3) I know the 3 warnings biz. 4) As being the schools captain, I already have responsibility.

I hope you guys don't do the "not mature" opposes, I've changed for the better. I've also seen a few people "de-modded" (If that's a word :D) it seems like there is a space opening up. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 06:09, February 15, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  • --Power Jim 06:08, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • RaceLord talk, Time To Craft Some...Thing.
  • Bob bricks Talk
  • User:Darth henry/Sig 3 14:58, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • wait what have the admins voted for, hmmmmmmmm, oh well votey votey Prisinorzero 20:48, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • I vote for him, and WHY, WHY, WHY DID YOU HAVE TO CHANGE A PERFECTLY GOOD USERNAME?!?

User:SuperSpyX/Sig1 02:49, February 18, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Not yet.. Great user, and he has changed a bit, but I dont think now is the time. User:Skdhjf/SigT 02:06, February 24, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Oppose - So close to the last request. Let's have some time gap to see some actual changes. User:Ajraddatz/sig 17:34, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Good thinking to change your name, let's just give it some time to see if it will work. Berrybrick 20:03, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm struggling to explain why, but my gut instinct is to oppose for now. - CJC 20:14, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Im sorry but i wouldnt trust you as a chat moderator.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • I don't think you'd be horrible, but I'm quite uncomfortable with the idea... Drewlzoo(talk) (blogs)
  • Oppose - I cannot trust you... User:MassiveSodaDuck/SigMaster 02:52, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
    • I bet you're just saying that because you're running against him. For that I'm opposing you. User:Dataman1/sig 23:41, February 23, 2012 (UTC)

*He is a fool no one can trust. --User:IRONUPTHEHIDE and the autobots are here to help you. 23:53, February 23, 2012 (UTC)

    • You shouldn't be allowed to vote, you are biased because he wanted to kick you from chat, and for good reason. --Lord Shu 00:03, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Not mature enough. User:Mythrun/SigCode

Comments

  • I still bet heaps of users are going to go either neutral or oppose you CP. --Power Jim 06:09, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Should this be closed by now? I think it's passed succesfully. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 01:27, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
  • Anyone gonna close this? It's successful. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 02:21, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
    It looks "not done" to me... User:Skdhjf/SigT 02:23, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
    Successful isn't passing the 50% mark, successful meaning a significant majority of the community in support with some good, not refuted arguments in favour. This request doesn't have either at this time... User:Ajraddatz/sig 02:30, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
    Personally I'd be leaning towards closing due to no consensus so do not grant rights, but I'm not really sure. NovaHawk 02:32, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
    • Maybe a one week trial?
  • People. It started on the 15th it should be over. Can someone finish this up? --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 22:16, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
  • Request for Closure - Looks to me that this request is Not Done/very close to failed. Can a neutral admin please close? User:Skdhjf/SigT 03:28, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
Closed - failed. The opposers have stated reasons, while the supporters have not. Also, there is a very close margin. User:Captain Jag/sig1 03:32, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Admiral[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Detailed explanation of why you are nominating this user/yourself for adminship. I am on this wiki allvth time, I love Legos, and would love to do more with them.

Support

Neutral


Oppose

  • Never seen you on. Probably due to me being aussie--User:Crazed Penguin/spook 21:19, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
  • All the time? I've never heard of you. Berrybrick 00:40, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Never seen you on chat, new user, barely edited, then asked for chat mod rights. I've been seeing this a lot lately. >_> --Lord Shu 00:48, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per the others, although, unlike them, I actually have talked to you. User:Cligra/Sig
  • You could at least make one edit to the wiki before requesting rights, even if it is for chatmod NovaHawk 01:04, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • No User:MassiveSodaDuck/SigMaster 01:14, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
Reason? User:CM4S/Sig
  • Who are you? User:CM4S/Sig
  • Consider it like this. You've been here a day. I find we can barely trust some of those who have been here for months. So, currently I don't know whether I can trust you. - CJC 08:43, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • For one you've left the instructions to put your reason for requesting still on, secondly as we told you on chat you have none of the requirements to be a mod, and lastly you came on chat and shouted at Cligra for having a supposedly offensive name, spammed (because you have short term memory loss?) and told me and several others on PM that you hate me. Prisinorzero 20:09, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • I would like to help you in any way shape or form on this Wiki.
  • Look. The only 4 edits you've made have been on just this page. Do you understand where I'm coming from there? --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 01:06, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
  • Closed. Obvious result, extremely unlikely that it would change right now. NovaHawk 22:27, February 22, 2012 (UTC)


Awesomeknight1234[edit source]

{{archive |result=done |content= I know how to deal with spammers. I've had allot of experience as a Chat Mod from the Alien Conquest Wiki. I'm not going to spam this on chat like everyone else, I'll just let you find it yourself. I really hope I get these rights, but I'm okay if I do not.

Support[edit source]

  • Strong Support He is the greatest knight who ever lived and is more than capable of being a chat moderatr. Sensible and just, give this man the privallege! --From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 16:46, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support He's on chat a lot, never spams, and often helps out. User:1999bug/sig1 21:43, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
  • He si a friendly user that has helped me a few times, I think he could do it Bob bricks Talk 21:44, February 12, 2012 (UTC)

- He never spams. Ever. Plus, I've seen him on chat A LOT.--"Well, if it istn't Von Nutcase."- Preston Stormer Favorite Toa: Lewa Nuva (Phantoka) Favorite Hero: Duncan Bulk 3.0 21:45, February 12, 2012 (UTC)

  • Its in his user name, I reckon he'll be able to deal with people yet not abuse his powers "with great power, comes great responsibility" Prisinorzero 21:46, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
  • Sure. - CJC 21:47, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
  • Sounds good, no major issues and I think he'd be able to handle it well. User:Ajraddatz/sig 23:04, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per CJC :P Berrybrick 23:06, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
  • Certaintly, definately, absolutely. =3 --Lord Shu
  • Yes yes yes yes and YES! User:Darth henry/Sig 3 01:56, February 13, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per everyone.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
  • His never lost his temper before and is quite friendly. So yeah, he'd make a good Chat mod. -Power Jim 07:00, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Ajr. User:SKP4472/sig2 07:54, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
  • He's always friendly, and remains calm at all times. Would make a good chat mod.--SD 14:03, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • He's really nice and he said that the evil power of moderation wont get him --{|style="border: 3px solid Green; background-color: Black; width: 50%;border-collapse:collapse;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" |- | |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;padding:1px;"|[[User:Dino2012|The most feared Dinosaur of all time! DINO2012 14:20, February 18, 2012 (UTC)Dino2012
  • Knight is a very mature and responsible user, I believe he will be a responsible mod. :D --Lord Shu 23:44, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
  • Sure =p Chat mod buddies =D --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 05:05, February 19, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral[edit source]

Oppose[edit source]

Comments[edit source]

Is it soon enough to say he's getting it? =P User:1999bug/sig1 07:30, February 20, 2012 (UTC) lol ikr. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 07:33, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

  • If I have time I'll close tonight. - CJC 08:39, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

}}

Mr.Brick[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was not done

Requested I nominate via chat. User:1999bug/sig1 23:44, February 13, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

  • I think he should try again in 2 months... Right now there's no need for it, and I think there's other users who deserve it more. Drewlzoo(talk) (blogs)
Like me. :P User:MassiveSodaDuck/SigMaster

User:SuperSpyX/Sig1 21:37, February 15, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • heres what i think:im on chat most of the time(meaning i can catch spammers and swearers) and i have learned alot from editing on this wiki,and many other wikis.please support and happy voting!-Mr.Brick

ToaSnicket98[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was not done

I think I would be a good chat mod because I've seen too many arguments, such as one between SuperSpyX and BerryBrick about the Golden Weapons of Spinjitzu, on the chat. Plus, I wouldn't abuse my special abilities, and if I do it well on this chat, then I can really help out with the problems on LEGO Universe Wiki's chat when they reopen it.--"Well, if it istn't Von Nutcase."- Preston Stormer Favorite Toa: Lewa Nuva (Phantoka) Favorite Hero: Duncan Bulk 3.0 21:29, February 7, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  • He is very mature and there are so many arguments, the more the chatmods, the more protection! Bob bricks Talk 20:42, February 12, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

  • You joined today, need I say more? User:CM4S/Sig
  • You only joined today, so I'd like some more experience first. - CJC 21:23, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose It's... You're... Ugh. Edit: Sorry, I was so frustrated I forgot to sign. User:1999bug/sig1 21:44, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • oppose
Lack of experience. User:Ajraddatz/sig 05:12, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per ajr.
User:Crazed Penguin/spook
  • I'd have to agree with CJC Drewlzoo(talk) (blogs)
  • Good heavens! That argument was to try to clear up some misunderstandings. And if BerryBrick thought I was being nasty, he could of banned me himself!User:SuperSpyX/Sig1 13:07, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
    • You weren't being nasty, only stubborn, which is different. Berrybrick 19:59, February 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per CJC. -User:King of Nynrah/sig1 20:36, February 8, 2012 (UTC)

You just joined never seen one of your edits--Matau2004 20:28, February 12, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

  • Example of argy-bargys (and what are those :P ) Berrybrick 21:22, February 7, 2012 (UTC)


Matau2004[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was not done

I will make sure no one does anything bad in chats and will give one warning if anyone does anything harmful.--Matau2004 00:11, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

Comments

  • I think I need to see a few reasons before I vote. Berrybrick 00:10, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Closed, not done. Obviously there isn't consensus for promotion. Matau2004, please take into account the suggestions made by opposers and come back to RFP in a month or so if you'd like to volunteer again. User:Ajraddatz/sig 17:33, January 15, 2012 (UTC)


Clone Commander Gunner Jedi (1)[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Unsuccessful

Im allways on chat im a trusted friendly user and i will only ban after giving two warnings so i think i would be a good chat moderator.Clone gunner commander jedi talk

Support

  • Strongly support - Clone is/was a good chat mod and deserves to be again. --From the desk of Br1ck an1mator 10:36, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support well if hes going to get to admin he at least needs to be a chat mod Prisinorzero 10:54, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Support- he edits a lot and helps the wiki. User:MassiveSodaDuck/SigMaster
    • How has that got to do with Chat mod? He also may have been the reason it was closed. Request to strike that vote. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 05:23, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

  • Not yet. - CJC 14:03, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per CJC --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 00:45, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • He was one already --RaceLord 07:48, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
    • No. He was stripped his power due to it being reopened. Many users did not get back their chatmod rights. --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 07:58, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
      • ya but i think know poeple should be Chat Mods --RaceLord 08:10, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
  • User can be very mature at *some* times, but may sometimes stray to a "less-mature" state. Maybe mature a little more, and we can see what we can do. :) User:Skdhjf/SigT 05:27, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

  • Strong oppose he is sometimes mean. User:Darth henry/Sig 13:30, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose a very short fuse sometimes on chat. Also not a good idea considering all the drama at the LMBW. -King of Nynrah Talk 13:34, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose Sorry, I like CGCJ, but I don't really trust him as a chat mod now. Especially considering how he was acting towards newbies up until recently and the chat rules at The Brickipedia Project Wiki. Berrybrick 13:54, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
    • I never made those chat rules Ba and Zero did.Clone gunner commander jedi talk
      • I didn't say you wrote them, I just said because of those rules. Anyway, then that would be a reason for me to oppose those twos' RfCM. Berrybrick 20:27, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Strong oppose I like him, but I after everything that's happened recently, I'm no longer willing to trust him with rights. User:Cligra/Sig
  • Oppose (this is an oppose section- do we really need to all say oppose?). I don't know if I agree with "trusted" or "friendly" anymore, I really don't know what happened. Anyway, apparently insulting people on chat already. I don't know if this is true or not, but in the past, there seemed to be accusations like this constantly surrounding this user. NovaHawk 23:55, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per everyone.
User has never been 100% trustable --User:Crazed Penguin/spook 02:03, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose I have to agree with you all. Sorry CGCJ, you're just hard to trust. User:1999bug/sig
  • Oppose - Sorry, we can't trust you with the privileges in light of some recent incidents. FB100Z • talk • contribs 02:12, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
  • Strong Oppose No offense, CGCJ, but I think that you're a big reason why chat was closed. No offense, though. :) Drewlzoo(talk) (blogs)

Comments

SuperSpyX[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was No consensus

I was a chat mod before chat was disabled. I never had to ban anyone, warnings worked on the few instances of abuse. There was one situation that CM4S said I handled wrong, but I did tell the guilty parties to desist, which they did. I have never been banned or blocked from chat. 

 User:SuperSpyX/Sig1 17:57, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Support

  • Agood, kind helpful user --Brick bobby 13:38, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

Comments

  • I really do not get the point of the Neutral section. If you want to be neutral, just don't vote.

User:SuperSpyX/Sig1 17:57, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

    • Neutral shows that you have seen the vote and taken it into account. Not voting implies that you have not seen the request or that you have let to make a decision. - CJC 19:06, January 4, 2012 (UTC)


Evanf[edit source]

The following section is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. The result was Not done

Evanf (Talk - Contribs - Block/rights logs - Logs) - ( edits, 0 mainspace)

Hi y'all, I know I have done a few bad things, but I have learned. And nevertheless, I am requesting to be a Chat Moderator. I am mature, and I love to help new people. I am almost always on chat and don't abuse my power. I feel, and I have watched new users, or just spammers, come and go but there has defiantly been an increase of spammers. I know the mods have taken care of most of it, but I feel that I should help too. I always love getting rid of ridiculous users who think they are all that and do extremely bad things. I really want to help out our side against the vandals. User:Evanf/Sig

Support

  1. As said before, MORE MODS MORE MODS!! --User:CzechMate/czech 21:39, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
  2. I support. --Admiral Neo 21:50, May 10, 2012 (UTC)Neo--Admiral Neo 21:50, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Support, he deserves it. Wowirock

Neutral

  1. We don't need anymore chat mods, and in the time I've seen you on chat, you..weren't the best. Plus, you're not that nice. I can't make a decision, but I'm leaning towards opposing. User:CM4S/Sig
  • Well, I got to admit I was kind of mean to you, sorry. I was angry, something happened in real life. User:Evanf/Sig
  • I don't really care (no offence. Does that even--?), but I'm still not supporting. User:CM4S/Sig
No more mods? How does having another one hurt CM4S? --User:CzechMate/czech 21:44, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Well, in that case, make every single freakin' member chat mod? How's that? 15px User:CM4S/Sig
Well, I never said that CM4S -Don't need to argue- Well, anyways, thanks for your opinion. User:Evanf/Sig

Oppose

  1. I am so sorry... I felt that way about everything you said up above... But then a few mistakes happened and I am just not sure about that anymore... Maybe After a while... User:Sonofhades101/signature
  2. I'd rather see that you've learned than just take your word for it. Berrybrick 23:09, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Per BB/SoH. User:Cligra/Sig
  4. Per Cliggers. --User:Makuta Tarkairadan/PSig 23:48, May 10, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Retrieved from "https://en.brickimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brickipedia:Requests_for_Chat_Moderator/Archive&oldid=880290"